Conspiracy theories and lost opportunities (just for fun)

Jimmy Diamond quote: "I am just doing Gods work" would definitely qualify, and a cast of thousands in the 1% demographic - globally... - - and yes almost there (a lost cause)... - - There are a couple of whistle blowers - Murder and Courts Martial are excellent silencers as are 'legal-poverty' assassinations and real assassinations of inconvenient 'broadcasters' (globally)...

 

I don't buy the Masalai / Boston controlled demolition theory for one moment no matter how much you repeat it. Can you cite one other building that was wired for such controlled demolition while being fully occupied, without being noticed?

 

Government consists of people in large numbers, the notion that no-one therein would have the fortitude and wit to expose a mass murder plot, is not a case capable of being argued to the sane.

 

With your boat's value, are you in the 1% masalai?

 

More like the bottom 10%... That is the final representation of my life's work (most has been given away or spent in surviving)... Gross income over 55 years would be about 2,500,000 or more... The boat represents about 300,000 from capital gains in a home - - - - and your comment is disgusting and sluttish in demeanour...

 

How can you be in the "bottom 10%" with a $300,000 boat masalai?

I see you edited your post. Didn't mean to offend by calling you successful!
I think your categorization of being in the "bottom 10%" while having $300,000 free and clear is misleading... do you think 50% have $300,000 free and clear without debt?

 

$300k ain't a king's ransom these days, a $400k house is entry level here.

 

With or without mortgage is the question... a $400,000 asset or a $400,000 obligation.

money.cnn.com said in 2009, it took $343,927 earnings per year to be in the 1% US. Masalai's boat if earned in one year might qualify him, but only if he earned it in one year.

Entering 2,500,000/55 years, or $45,454 a year on http://www.globalrichlist.com/ said masalai is in the 1.59% of the world's richest. Try it for fun.www.globalrichlist.com

 

Sorry to dissapoint you BPL, No theory, JUST SIMPLY asking questions that seem pertinent, as the answers given are too full of BS to hold any credibility and the holes just do not make sense...

If you cannot pay off a home-mortgage in 55 working years then you probably have too many wives, things, toys, beer-fridges, gambling-habit, drug-addiction, cronic-illness, expensive-social-commitments or all of the aforementioned... 35 years ago build for about 45000... I am an OLD AGE PENSIONER...

Hells Bells BPL you are an absolute Richard Cranium... 45K is about half the Australian average wage (NOT EVEN looking at salary levels)... You are a dummy and self-centered USAnian fool who apparently knows NOTHING of the rest of the world... - (said in non-complementary terms) a loud-mouth waste of space of the strangest kind... That website has to be the biggest BS fraud as my pension puts me around 12% or so and THAT IS WELL BELOW the recognised Australian poverty level - You Sir, are a NUTTER, misinformed and full of useless BS...

 

Speaking of questions, no one is answering mine. The question isn't whether someone in the government could have pulled off 9/11 (which I seriously doubt; most of them can't walk and chew bubble gum at the same time).

The real question is, why would they arrange it? What did they accomplish, that couldn't have been accomplished easier and cheaper without it?

 

Have I said Whom? I base my questions on flaws in the explanation and reasonable engineering discourse as one would expect of one who has a diversity and depth of experience and some openness to others logical explanations...

I am happy with the idea that Bin Liner did not do it or plan it (he may have contributed or redirected some money to a cause... Bin Liner was sufficiently vein to claim any role if he could...

It is not a matter of Who, - as that may never be known... But what it would take to achieve those collapses/falls or whatever you call it... Then an informed guess could be made as to who is telling fibs and who has some explaining to do...

To suggest why, - at this point, is not a legitimate question as there is no point in hypothesising that far away from what is known or to think of motives...

I know what the devastation caused, A very strong "anti-terrorist" response and "war" from many nations... I do not feel that that "the war on terror" had any impact on reducing acts of terror such as "road-side-bombs" or "suicide-bombers" and so on - sometimes it seems to have escalated those fears and incidents...

 

Thanks for being such a nice guy masalai. You start a thread just for fun and then yell at me. Go yell at yourself.
Someone has been taking too many crazy pills

 

No Woodwards or Bernsteins around these days apparently. Or the villains are way to clever to get caught.

 

Hi Troy,
I saw a "talking head" on a USA TV show who, when the words/sound stopped he appeared to continue (chewing?) and he was also flipping a pencil, and looking around... Does that count? is he an intellectual? or an animated figure?

Our government members (politicians and bureaucrats) are also of a high intellectual standard... I have yet to encounter any that drive a vehicle, although some have mastered the art of walking and talking for the cameras, mouthing learned phrases... (but they could be robots or something?

 

How about a little honesty, for a change? If you're claiming 9/11 was a put-up job, the list of suspects is short. The Mormon Tabernacle Choir has very few tenors who know how to wire buildings with explosives, and that particular skill isn't a merit badge for the Boy Scouts of America either.

So when you try to convince us it was a controlled demolition and the planes didn't really cause the damage, it's obvious you're pointing a finger at our own government -- and implying it murdered almost 3,000 of its citizens (along with assorted foreigners) for purposes of its own.

What were those purposes? To write anti-terrorist laws, and invade Afghanistan? Give me a break, mate: whipping the general populace up to a paranoid war fever is so easy any two-bit politician can do it, without even setting his drink down first. No one has to blow up buildings for that....