IATGC
Junior Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2017
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- United States
If you make 4x4' pontoons with a 12' beam, you have l_l l_l or 6 sheets ply and framing. If you make a monohull, you would have l____l which would use 5 sheets of ply and less framing. And better stability than a pontoon.
I don't think that's what's in creosote. If you soak the wood with diesel, you will smell it for as long as the boat lasts and it also makes it pretty flammable. Plus you can't glue to it. I've used good condition railroad ties for various things and they don't last all that long, ants and bugs don't seem to mind it much.
A 58' long boat, besides being very expensive, or not, needs a lot of engineering to counteract the various ways it can be stressed and broken apart.
You're right, that's a very good point. It would be much stronger and simpler to build/design a monohull, not to mention the extra carrying capacity. I had actually decided to start sketching a monohull design before you posted that ironically.
Are you familiar with a little houseboat design known as the Lisa B Good? Look at the framing schedule of this boat. It's very similar to the frame my much larger design will have.
http://www.duckworksbbs.com/plans/browne/lisa-b-good/Lisa B Good notes and drawings.pdf
Of course the frame in my larger boat will be much stouter, and slightly different. The longitudinal/bottom frames will be made out of doubled up bolted/glued 2x12x16 framing lumber. The cross members will be made of doubled up 2x6x12 framing lumber that is glued together. The plywood will be 3/4 MDO on the sides and bottom. It will have 17 oz glass cloth on the bottom, sides and fore/aft decks.
So with all this negativity surrounding creosote, does anyone know of a better rot or insect prevention treatment? Ethylene Glycol?
Last edited: