Open Water Efficiency

Discussion in 'Props' started by stalin, May 14, 2010.

  1. stalin
    Joined: May 2010
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: asia

    stalin Junior Member

    I have optimised the propeller as follows:

    Propeller Diameter = 1.1
    P/D = 0.75
    Pitch = 0.8250
    AE/A0 = 1.0328
    RPM = 689.43
    open water eff = 0.42
    cav.number = 0.2857

    Vessel particulars:

    LWL = 21 M
    dISP = 117T

    Engine is 1x400 hp @1800 rpm, with gear ratio 2.59. Max diameter of the propeller is 1.1m, according the stern shape. Can anybody confirm that the open water efficiency is reasonable for this size of vessel.

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. bmsyachts
    Joined: Jun 2005
    Posts: 7
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Richmond, Virginia

    bmsyachts naval architect

    Hi Stalin,

    What is the design speed of the boat at which the prop is to be selected?
     
  3. conceptia
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 203
    Likes: 7, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 97
    Location: Houston

    conceptia Naval Architect

    also the number of blades...
     
  4. stalin
    Joined: May 2010
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: asia

    stalin Junior Member

    Sorry for late reply. No.of Blades are 4 & design speed of the vessel is 10 knots.
     
  5. conceptia
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 203
    Likes: 7, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 97
    Location: Houston

    conceptia Naval Architect

    hey stalin, the effieciency value is ok. But you can improve it if you want to. I feel the main problem is the space constraint for accomodating propeller, right? In that case, you can ahead wid dis. But also listen what Daiquiri, Leo and others has to say about it.
     
  6. bit
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 46
    Likes: 1, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 34
    Location: Trieste

    bit Student

    Pitch too high?
    D = 1100 mm
    P = 711 mm
    Ae / Ao = 0.7
    z = 4
    w = 0.1344
    Eta0 = 0.466
    T = 31.11 kN
    Pe = 195.7 hp
    Pb = 415.3 hp
    No. Cav. = 0.271
    Cavit. = 4.91%
    My opinion ...
     
  7. bmsyachts
    Joined: Jun 2005
    Posts: 7
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Richmond, Virginia

    bmsyachts naval architect

    Your selection is most likely correct, but in terms of efficiency not close to "optimized".

    The potential open water efficiency could be as high as 76% but with a much lower prop RPM and much larger diameter (in fact, huge!) Twin screws ease the situation but still very slow RPM and large diameter props to enjoy full potential prop efficiency.

    So it's a balancing act with compromises in efficiency (fuel consumption) fighting prop size and space constraints and first cost.
     

  8. bit
    Joined: Feb 2008
    Posts: 46
    Likes: 1, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 34
    Location: Trieste

    bit Student

    Ok.
    Is D = 1100mm : stop.
    Better not be
    Bye
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.