# Australian Naval Architect May 2015

Discussion in 'Education' started by Leo Lazauskas, May 13, 2015.

1. Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 155, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2229
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

### Leo LazauskasSenior Member

2. Joined: May 2009
Posts: 16,679
Likes: 349, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 1362
Location: Cocoa, Florida

### Doug LordFlight Ready

Thanks Leo! Some very interesting stuff especially the detailed article on the DSS foil installation on Wild Oats XI and the "T" bulb discussion-and I'm not through yet.

3. Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 312
Likes: 58, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 172
Location: Germany

### Remmlingerengineer

The resistance prediction by Fagerli for a trimaran and of course his regression analysis are interesting for me. Do you have an idea if the thin-ship method in the Maxsurf-code is identical to Michlet?
When I compared Michlet to tank data, the measured resistance at FN=0.3 was always lower than the Michlet-prediction. Fagerli found the opposite. His measured value is higher than the thin-ship estimate. I am wondering what the reason might be.

4. Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 155, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2229
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

### Leo LazauskasSenior Member

I haven't read it in any detail, Uli, because I have moved onto other
(non-hydro) projects.

One reason Michlet might predict higher resistance is that Michlet includes
BL displacement effects unless you use a negative value for Ntheta.

Maxsurf uses similar algorithms for predicting wave resistance. The last
Maxsurf manual I read (about 7 years ago) mentioned that they use Filon
transforms developed by E.O. Tuck. Those transforms for the z-wise integrals
are exact for piece-wise linear sections: Michlet and Flotilla use Filon
transforms that are exact for piece-wise parabolic sections.
Michlet, Flotilla and Maxsurf use Filon transforms for the x-wise integrals that
are exact for piece-wise parabolic waterlines. I believe Maxsurf is still using
those numerical techniques.

5. Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 312
Likes: 58, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 172
Location: Germany

### Remmlingerengineer

Thanks Leo for the insight you gave.
Can non-hydro projects be fun? Hope they are not too simple.

6. Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 155, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2229
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

### Leo LazauskasSenior Member

Quadrature of highly oscillatory integrals is nice clean applied maths, with exact answers guided by theorems and lemmas.

7. Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 312
Likes: 58, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 172
Location: Germany

### Remmlingerengineer

Math is such a straightforward science. Compared to that engineering is a mess, but it seems that I like it messy

8. Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 155, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2229
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

### Leo LazauskasSenior Member

I need to do some mathematics so I can speed up messy hydrodynamics
problems. Also, multiple processors are now commonly available so I thought I
would devote some time to re-code a few of my programs.
That's the nice part of being retired/unemployed - plenty of time and no
responsibilities.

Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.