Apple in China

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by watchkeeper, Dec 7, 2011.

  1. watchkeeper

    watchkeeper Previous Member

    Apple has lost its claim to own the iPad brand in China. The verdict now leaves it open to a $1.6 billion lawsuit.

    In principle the case is extremely simple: a company named Proview technology registered the name “IPAD” as a trademark in Taiwan in 2000 and in China the following year. Given that even the iPod (not iPad) wasn’t publicly announced until October 2001, there’s no serious contention that Proview copied the name rather than created it.

    The legal dispute didn’t center on who created the name, but rather on a 2006 deal when Proview sold the rights to use the name in Taiwan to an American firm named IP Application Development, which had been registering the term worldwide. That firm later turned out to be a dummy corporation controlled by Apple, apparently used to avoid tipping off competitors.

    Apple went on to sue Proview’s subsidiary in China for continuing to claim the rights to the name in that country. It’s not entirely clear whether Apple believed the Taiwan trademark purchase also extended to the Chinese mainland, or if it was simply chancing its arm.

    Either way, that lawsuit has now failed, with Shenzen’s Municipal Intermediate People’s Court declaring Apple does not have any trademark rights for the name in China.

    To make things worse for Apple, Proview in China is currently under the administrative control of a management consultancy firm, appointed by banks to deal with the company being “on the brink of bankruptcy.” The verdict thus comes as something of a jackpot, with the consultancy’s boss Li Su saying he’ll be suing for what he calls “very clear” infringement by Apple in selling the iPad in China. He’s demanding 10 billion yuan ($1.6 billion) and suggests that figure could rise unless Apple halts sales in the country.
  2. PAR
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 19,133
    Likes: 489, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3967
    Location: Eustis, FL

    PAR Yacht Designer/Builder

    I see a new acquisition in Apple's future, which would have been the prudent course previously. I suspect Li Su is being unreasonable in the buy out offers I'm sure he received, so the logical step is to let him die on the vine, stepping in with a substantially reduced offer when his legs have atrophied sufficiently. These cases almost always see the victor as the one with the deepest pockets, placing Li Su in a difficult position, which Apple well knows.
    1 person likes this.
  3. CDK
    Joined: Aug 2007
    Posts: 3,324
    Likes: 148, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1819
    Location: Adriatic sea

    CDK retired engineer

    I think that's wonderful news.
    From day one Apple has aggressively sued every company that even considered making a product looking of smelling like the stuff they marketed. They did so well that everybody seems to ignore the fact that they now are the worlds largest merchants of highly overrated and overpriced Asian gadgets.

    Arrogance now has a $ 1.600.000.000 price tag. They deserve it.
    3 people like this.

  4. IMP-ish
    Joined: Jan 2011
    Posts: 389
    Likes: 9, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 150
    Location: united states of america

    IMP-ish powerboater

    Change the name iPad to something else for the China market.
    Something written in Chinese.
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.