Windship277
Junior Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
- Posts
- 40
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- S.Cal. Mountains
Though a clinker is a beautiful look, it is slower and heavier. I should also mention, though tardily, that my source of power not under sail will be...lol, me. Oars. Less wetted surface=good. I did consider a Whitehall as well.Thanks, PAR, for your explanations. I was thinking of constructions like those of the figure and, of course, I had never thought of using plywood boards but solid wood boards in both cases.
View attachment 134390
I still do not understand why one method or another need larger scantlings or why the fact that the tables are glued gives rise to much larger scantlings. It is very likely that the "clinker" will produce heavier hulls. In order to be able to affirm it would have to consider all the structure, not only the planks of the shell. But I, who have no experience in this type of construction, I can not know. I only ask questions and I question what I do not see clear.
I found the following on the internet:
“Using carvel planks to construct a hull is when planks are fixed to frames with their edges butting up against each other. This method of construction produces a smooth hull, however, the seams tend to require caulking (except in the case of very small boats) and generally it is heavier to similarly sized clinker boats. The construction detail does make a strong hull.”See also : http://www.yachtpaint.com/usa/diy/ask-the-experts/what-is-the-difference-between-clinker-and-carvel-construction.aspx “Clinker built vessels are lighter”
Which seems to go against some other opinions. In short, I still do not understand. Anyway, many thanks for the explanations.
Last edited: