Ocean News

Smog ain't CO2.
Control smog all you want to.
Leave CO2 alone.

 

HMMMM....wtf is an EL Nina...? HMMMM

 

The smog in Chongqing was caused by fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) that are burned "CO2" into the atmosphere to supply the largest industry province in China.
The actual air smelled like the inside of a coal boiler and the fine coal dust was spread and piled up through out the city, but now the major power supply is hydro from the largest dam in the world which since the Co2 has been reduced the smell of coal is gone and smog also majorly reduced.

 

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/ninonina.html

Both El Nino and La Nina cause waemer than normal temperatures over a large area.

I was including both in El Nina.

 

What is La Niña? | NOAA

Do you ever tire of being wrong?

 

Melting ice sheets changing the way the Earth wobbles on its axis, says Nasa | The Guardian

 

There’s a reason some birds don’t seem to fly south for winter anymore, scientists say | Washington Post

 

Re-drawing charts, inventing your own terms for non existent phenomena...hmmm....I must think about this...

 

I'm NOT redrawing charts.
I'm clarifying the PERTINENT data.
I say warming has been insignificant past 17 to 20 years.
Responding, IN posts charts back to 1800s.
Current data lost in the mass of unnecessary data.
I zeroed in on past 20 years. Same chart. A piece of it magnified.
It's ya'll's trying to confuse people with century long charts on one axis. and tiny 100ths of a degree on the other axis, to try to get people to go "WOW! Looks significant".

If you made the chart 5 centuries long, you'd see the same warming trend has been occurring MUCH longer. But THAT message defuses your man-made warming propaganda.

If you made the other axis degrees F from -30 to 100, the normal range of peoples experience, warming would ALL look pretty flat.

Most AGW propaganda could justly be referred to as smoke and mirrors.

Or "If you can't impress them with your brilliance, then baffle them with your BS".

 

I'm fluent in Spanish.
I know masculine El doesn't go with feminine nina.

To me, it is an obvious conjunction.

Apparently lot's that's obvious to me isn't to you.

Sorry for you, but I can't fix you.

 

I got big fingers.
The r is next to e and wrong letter got hit.
its called a typo., IN.

 

Yes, we know deniers love to cherry pick data and ignore the context. Thank you for the demonstration.

It's not working. Try harder.

 

Where "aware thinking folk" = "people who really believe major fields of science are a conspiracy between Satan and the Illuminati".

Ok.

 

Not EVERYBODY suckered into the AGW morass has hidden agendas or is evil.
But the AGW scam was designed intentionally by communists/socialists as a MEANS of furthering their philosophy.

Apparently, their propaganda is only appealing to liberals and progressives, because the reds and liberals, their minds already work similarly.
Conservatives aren't enticed. Not vulnerable to socialist feely thinking.

Some folks rely on "feels" right.
Others rely on "makes sense".

Feelers tend to be liberal/progressive/socialist.
Thinkers tend to be conservative.

Feelers aren't BAD people.
Just not qualified to be in charge.

Because they work based on internal feelings about data rather than external objective analysis.

Look at some of their arguments.
"You don't love your children if da-da-da-da.!"
A thinking person thinks, "Absurd! Ridiculous argument! I love my kids and BECAUSE I love my kids, I don't want these silly wabbits running things!"
Another feeler decides, "Right! I OWE it to my kids!" , without stopping to realize they were just manipulated. Unaware and unthinking.

Or the liberal argument "All this man-made CO2 just HAS to be bad!"
Conservative thinks "Says who? YOU? I don't trust your opinion because you are naive and gullible. Vulnerable to emotional manipulation."

Look at most AGW propaganda, it's emotional blackmail.
Thinkers aren't subject to emotional blackmail.
Their minds rule, not their hearts.

 

Guess who this reminds me off ?