Cat hull design

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by WildHare, Feb 9, 2006.

  1. WildHare
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 3
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Austin TX

    WildHare New Member

    I'm an amateur boat builder and am planning on building a small coastal cruising cat. I purchased plans and began construction on an 18 ft cat, but then recently came across plans (of similar size)that appear to have much more comfortable accomadations and a much greater weight capacity. I am considering scrapping the current project and beginning again.The thing is, the hulls on this new boat are asymmetical. These are in fact what aids to the roomieness of the plans--hulls that are large enough to be slept in comfortably, more weight capacity, and a longer distance between the keels that lends to a longer boat that can still be legally trailered.

    I know that this style hull appears to be "yesterday's technology" but I have not been able to find much information on the pros and cons of symmetrical hulls vs. asymmetrical hulls. I would greatly appreciate it if someone could explain some of pros and cons of both style hulls or direct me to some helpful info. Thanks!
     
  2. grob
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 216
    Likes: 5, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 53
    Location: Cotswolds Waterpark, UK

    grob www.windknife.com

    The point of an asymmetric design is that it is a hull shape that can go upwind without needing a keel or daggerboard, this is good for a boat that wants to operate easily off a beach, but a boat without daggerboards is not as efficient upwind as a boat with daggerboards. It then depends how much of a performance loss you are willing to tolerate.

    Your specific question was about asymmetric hulls versus symmetric hulls. And here the performance distintion is probably not so great, there are other factors which are probably more important.

    There is no doubt that some hull shapes are faster than others, It has often been stated that assymetric hulls are slower than symmetric ones and this is certainly true in some circumstances. But you must be careful that you are comparing apples with apples. You often get this statement when people are comparing an assymetric hobie 16 with more modern designs. However the things that make a H16 slow compared to modern cat designs is not necassarily the asymmetric hull shape, it is the lack of dagger board and heavy weight. The H16 is one of the fastest cats on a broad reach.

    To be honest on a cruising boat out and out speed probably won't be the deciding factor and one of the main reason that asymmetric hulls are "yesterday's technology" is that you cannot get both hulls from the same mold so they are expensive.

    Gareth
    www.fourhulls.com
     
  3. Toby P
    Joined: Jan 2006
    Posts: 42
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 45
    Location: UK

    Toby P Junior Member

    Asymmetric hulls only work if the windward hull is flying (or at least, is more out of the water than the leeward one). If the boat is dead flat, the asymmetry of the 2 hulls cancels each other out leaving no benefit. The idea is that the curved hull acts as a foil to produces lift to windward, thereby negating the need for centreboards. However, the efficiency of asymmetric hulls is very low due to their low asect ratio. Centreboards are MUCH better for sailing to windard.
    The Hobie 16 hulls are quite narrow and therefore have a reasonable amount of draught. I suspect they work by acting as skegs more than lifting foils, in which case the Dart/Topcat style hull would be simpler.
    As you are planning on cruising two thoughts come to mind. One, you are unlikely to be flying a hull, therefore there will certainly be no advantage to asymmetric hulls. Secondly, you may not need to do much windward sailing, therefore centreboards may be unnecessary (but you would still need skegs).
    BTW, accomodation on an 18' cat? Must be very tubby.
     
  4. Toby P
    Joined: Jan 2006
    Posts: 42
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 45
    Location: UK

    Toby P Junior Member

    The above notes only refer to the sailing ability of the boat. If the asymmetric hulls allow for more accomodation, this may be an over riding factor for you. it depends on your priorities. The extra width between keels will also increase stability marginally, all other things being equal (which they probably aren't e.g. displacement, sail area etc).
     
  5. JonathanCole
    Joined: May 2005
    Posts: 446
    Likes: 10, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 58
    Location: Hawaii

    JonathanCole imagineer

    If the line of the inside of the hulls is straighter, than the outside, then it stands to reason (I think) that a larger bow wave is formed on the outside and a smaller wave on the inside of the hulls. This may help to prevent wave to hull interference between the bow wave and the opposite hull. Of course this interference factor would only be a factor with both hulls in the water.
     
  6. grob
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 216
    Likes: 5, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 53
    Location: Cotswolds Waterpark, UK

    grob www.windknife.com

    With the greatest respect Toby, this isn't true and easily proved, hire a H16 on a light wind day, put your weight on the upwind hull to sail the boat flat, even if the boat is leaning slightly to windward you can still sail upwind. its not as good but it proves the point.

    But this is also true of symmetric hulls without centreboards also, that was my point.

    There are many features that generate lift, different hull shapes do it in different ways. Traditional designs use centreboards, skegs or asymmetric hulls. But there are cats around that have none of these and still go well up wind. The G cat is a symmetric hulled boat that does not have any of these features nor does my own four hulled boat. see www.fourhulls.com. There is no doubt that the centreboard or daggerboard is the most efficient because of the high aspect ratio, but don't dismiss asymmetric out of hand. The best you can do is find someone who has the boats you are considering building and try them out.

    Gareth
    H16 owner
     
  7. grob
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 216
    Likes: 5, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 53
    Location: Cotswolds Waterpark, UK

    grob www.windknife.com

    Good point I wish Michlet could handle assymetric hulls so this could be looked at.

    Gareth
     
  8. WildHare
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 3
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Austin TX

    WildHare New Member

    hull clarification

    Thanks for your replies, but I should clarify the shape of the hulls. They are actually flatter on the outside and curved on the inside, the opposite of the asymmetical hulls I've seen. This is what concerns me. If a boat like this had ever been built, I would try it out. Is there a program where I can attempt to "test" these hulls?
     
  9. fhrussell
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 156
    Likes: 2, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 30
    Location: Long Island, NY

    fhrussell Boatbuilder

    WildHare,
    This IS a sailing cat, correct? If so, then yes, the flatter side is the outer side and the curved side will be inside.... like a Hobie 16. This is the configuration for sailing cats. It is the opposite for powerboats if they are assymetric.
    Take a look at CSK cats and the early cats on Waikiki by Woody Brown; they were all assymetric and probably the earliest examples of modern asymetric hull design. Also look at K-designes for more info:

    http://www.ikarus342000.com/Catpage.htm

    Here's another thread you should read:

    http://boatdesign.net/forums/showthread.php?t=14269
     

  10. rxcomposite
    Joined: Jan 2005
    Posts: 2,754
    Likes: 608, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 1110
    Location: Philippines

    rxcomposite Senior Member

    Try Michlet. I am not sure if it could "test" assymetrical hull but it should be close.
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.