May need sterndrive for a 400HP CAt 3406

Discussion in 'Sterndrives' started by AlaskaFisherman, Nov 25, 2005.

  1. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    The only problem with surface drives is that they are only really efficient at higher speeds - generally over 40 knots or so - and tend to be pigs at slow to mid-range speeds. What sort of speeds do you anticipate running at?

    Tad - have you ever come across a surface dive installation that was efficient throughout the speed range? If so, I'd love to hear about it - coz they're such sexy beasts!!:D
     
  2. Tad
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Posts: 2,321
    Likes: 214, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 2281
    Location: Flattop Islands

    Tad Boat Designer

    Winston,

    Seems to me there were some pictures of your boat floating? From that you could make a guess at weight and required shaft angle. The success of any drive will rest with the propeller. A successful low-speed surface piercing prop. is a bit more exotic than you local shop can find. The other option is an inclined shaft in a tunnel or partial tunnel with full skeg for protection. That will kill performance, but may not be an issue? I would stay away from trying to build a trimming and steering (articulated as Arneson) drive, keep it simple.

    Will,
    The suggestion of surface drive was as a solution to very shallow drive in an existing boat with the given engine. Efficiency doesn’t really enter into the equation. Cost and reliability do. Thus I guess a $30k water jet is not an option. There are a couple of reasonable comments in the thread on low-speed surface drives in the Powerboats/propulsion section. Successful application of a low-speed surface drive will require specialized propeller design, but it certainly can be done. As you say, most boats with surface drives are optimized for something other than low speed operation. The pictures of the Levi's in the gallery seem to indicate most anyone could build one.


    All the best, Tad
     
  3. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Ah yes, perhaps I should have been clearer in my question: my take on surface drives is that they can only really be optimized for a relatively narrow speed range. In this they are no different from any other drive system of course; the difference being that with (most) other systems, the drop in efficiency outside the optimized range isn't so dramatic. Am I right? More specifically, have you (or anyone else for that matter) come across a surface drive installation that coul run efficiently throughout the speed range?
     
  4. AlaskaFisherman
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Kenai, Alaska

    AlaskaFisherman Junior Member

    How is the Levi for low speed / pulling power?

    Tad, I like the looks of the Levi. What do you know about their pulling power?
    Winston
     
  5. AlaskaFisherman
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Kenai, Alaska

    AlaskaFisherman Junior Member

    Starting to think I will be forced to go back to old slow design.

    Since the hull is looking a little flat at this stage, I was hoping of going with a design that would give high speeds. For this boat that would be 30 mph.
    Actually, 20 mph would be fast for our fishery.
    There are several boats with outdrives but they are not quite as heavy as my boat but they are not as wide either.
    My first design was to lower engine two feet so shaft and prop are parallel with hull, thinking this would give more speed. I would taper hull to prop from engine for smooth water flow to prop. I hear 7 to 8 % of power is lost with the
    7 deg. angle the prop has now. Will the drag from lowering the engine/reduction gear into a 2 foot wide chamber below the main hull help or hurt speed?
    The boat might be around 20k lbs dry after I add some more length, might as-well figure 25klbs with a few fish on board. She is 16 feet wide and I plan to finish her length off around 44 to 46 feet. She is 35 ft. now.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Deering
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 481
    Likes: 25, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 44
    Location: Juneau, Alaska

    Deering Senior Member

    Well, you might not win any Most Graceful Yacht awards, but I like it!

    Seems that, depending what's inside, you could build a tunnel into the bottom of that hull. Use the same prop/shaft/rudder setup, only it'd be 16" higher.
     
  7. AlaskaFisherman
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Kenai, Alaska

    AlaskaFisherman Junior Member

    That is what I had in mind. Any thought as to effects on speed?
    This stern is not the finial plan by -the-way, its just allows me to fish her inbetween cutting and welding.
     
  8. Deering
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 481
    Likes: 25, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 44
    Location: Juneau, Alaska

    Deering Senior Member

    Not sure...

    You'll lose some lift due to reduced planing surface area. That will hurt.

    The tunnel will probably contribute some drag due to the high speed water running along the walls. That will hurt.

    You'll be able to get less shaft angle. That should help.

    The big unknown in my book is the prop efficiency in the tunnel. I think the devil's in the details of the tunnel - how long, how close to prop tips, entrance detail into tunnel, etc.

    If you want to spend a few bucks getting the answer right, you might touch base with a firm like Hydrocomp (www.hydrocompinc.com) to help model it. Don Macpherson is the technical director and occasional list member here. Might be worth it before you start cutting & welding. Don has quoted me reasonable numbers for similar services.
     
  9. AlaskaFisherman
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Kenai, Alaska

    AlaskaFisherman Junior Member

    I might well do that, it is looking like 2007 before I make that cut so I have some time.
     
  10. AlaskaFisherman
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Kenai, Alaska

    AlaskaFisherman Junior Member

    Steve, I am going back to try these two listings. Out drives may be my only hope of increased speed. Thanks for the input.
     
  11. AlaskaFisherman
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 76
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Kenai, Alaska

    AlaskaFisherman Junior Member

    I am thinking of figuring on 25 klbs after adding 10 more feet to length and a few fish in the hold.
     

  12. longliner45
    Joined: Dec 2005
    Posts: 1,629
    Likes: 73, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 505
    Location: Ohio

    longliner45 Senior Member

    we had twin vovlo210s with duoprop out drives on 31and35 jc boats with 6000 lb loads we could do 20 knots .but no matter what drives them they will have a top speed of about 40 knots .you can put tractor wheels or speed wheels on them in 2 minutes ,for more info go to longliner45
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.