Climate change falsehood

Unfortunately it turned that way. One person can bring an otherwise fruitful discussion to an end by their bad manners and fanaticism.

 

No one said Christians are to blame, the article just opined about how "Believers" have a hard time accepting scientific facts.

Along with the Arctic permafrost melting and releasing huge amounts of methane is the possibility of rising ocean temperatures releasing even vaster amounts of methane when the methane hydrates trapped in the ocean floors melt. Along with the release of methane, which has 20 times the potency of carbon dioxide relating to greenhouse gasses, an increase of the acidity of the oceans is probable as is also a decrease of oxygen levels in the water. The increased acidity would be harmful to vast amounts of oceanic lifeforms while the decreased oxygen levels would create huge dead zones where nothing lives anyway. One other result could be that as the ice which holds the methane in place melts, the sea floor destabilizes with possible continental shelf submarine landslides causing massive tsunamis.

http://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-1/ocean-chemistry/climate-change-and-methane-hydrates/

 

I think it is not to us to decide that, but the thread starter Gonzo.
If some members behave. it can still be a good thread.

 

Thanks. If everybody posts one thing at a time and is polite, this can be interesting. Scientific theories should withstand challenges.

 

You guys are an embarrassment to your first-grade teachers.

“Teacher, you can give us only one post per day to read (preferably less than 100 words long), and please, please, please don’t ask us to read the whole article (much less any related links)!”

It’s no wonder you are so stupid.

Not much hope there...

ROCK (Scientific Knowledge)
SCISSORS (Religious Dogma)
PAPER (Stupidity)

Ultimate definition of STUPID

 

as denieing human inflicted globalwarming results financially very rewarding,the ones that dont want to take the risk with the futures climate,and try to live a low emission lifestyle ,end up with a big disadvantage on the "freemarket economy"
but when its too late nothing can be done
as a mather of fact the last southpole expedition"mala espina" came to the conclusion that wth half the ice gone the thing is now so far that zero emission wouldnt stop it and we should actually breakdown co2 to assure a livable climate for the future

 

STANDARDIZED BONEHEAD REPLY FORM
(c) copyright 1999 by someone else.

(check all boxes that apply)

Dear:

[ ] Clueless Newbie [ ] Lamer [ ] Flamer
[ ] Loser [ ] Spammer [ ] Troller
[ ] "Me too" er [ ] Pervert [ ] Geek
[ ] Freak [ ] Nerd [ ] Elvis
[ ] Racist [ ] Fed [ ] Freak
[ ] Fundamentalist [ ] Satanist [ ] Homeopath
[ ] Unbearably self-righteous person


I took exception to your recent:

[ ] Email [ ] Post to ____________________.
(newsgroup)

It was (check all that apply):

[ ] Lame [ ] Stupid [ ] Abusive
[ ] Clueless [ ] Idiotic [ ] Brain-damaged
[ ] Imbecilic [ ] Arrogant [ ] Malevolent
[ ] Contemptible [ ] Libelous [ ] Ignorant
[ ] Clueless [ ] Stupid [ ] Fundamentalist
[ ] Boring [ ] Dim [ ] Cowardly
[ ] Deceitful [ ] Demented [ ] Self-righteous
[ ] Crazy [ ] Weird [ ] Hypocritical
[ ] Loathsome [ ] Satanic [ ] Despicable
[ ] Belligerent [ ] Mind-numbing [ ] Maladroit
[ ] Much longer than any worthwhile thought of which you may be capable.



Your attention is drawn to the fact that:

[ ] You posted what should have been emailed
[ ] You obviously don't know how to read your newsgroups line
[ ] You are trying to make money on a non-commercial newsgroup
[ ] You self-righteously impose your religious beliefs on others
[ ] You self-righteously impose your racial beliefs on others
[ ] You posted a binary in a non-binaries group
[ ] You don't know which group to post in
[ ] You posted something totally uninteresting
[ ] You crossposted to *way* too many newsgroups
[ ] I don't like your tone of voice
[ ] What you posted has been done before.
[ ] Not only that, it was also done better the last time.
[ ] You quoted an *entire* post in your reply
[ ] You started a long, stupid thread
[ ] You continued spreading a long stupid thread
[ ] Your post is absurdly off topic for where you posted it
[ ] You posted a followup to crossposted robot-generated spam
[ ] You posted a "test" in a discussion group rather than in alt.test
[ ] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message
[ ] You posted low-IQ flamebait
[ ] You posted a blatantly obvious troll
[ ] You followed up to a blatantly obvious troll
[ ] You said "me too" to something
[ ] You make no sense
[ ] Your sig/alias is dreadful
[ ] You must have spent your life in a skinner box to be this clueless.
[ ] You posted a phone-sex ad
[ ] You posted a stupid pyramid money making scheme
[ ] You claimed a pyramid-scheme/chain letter for money was legal
[ ] Your margin settings (or lack of) make your post unreadable. Each line
just goes on and on, not stopping at 75 characters, making it hard to read.
[ ] You posted in ELitE CaPitALs to look k0OwL
[ ] You posted a message in ALL CAPS, and you don't even own a TRS-80
[ ] Your post was FULL of RANDOM CAPS for NO APPARENT REASON
[ ] You have greatly misunderstood the purpose of this newsgroup.
[ ] You have greatly misunderstood the purpose of the Internet.
[ ] You are a loser.
[ ] This has been pointed out to you before.
[ ] You didn't do anything specific, but appear to be so generally
worthless that you are being flamed on general principles.


It is recommended that you:

[ ] Get a clue
[ ] Get a life
[ ] Go away
[ ] Grow up
[ ] Never post again
[ ] Read every newsgroup you posted to for a week
[ ] stop reading Usenet news and get a life
[ ] stop sending Email and get a life
[ ] Bust up your modem with a hammer and eat it
[ ] Have your medication adjusted
[ ] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor
[ ] find a volcano and throw yourself in
[ ] get a gun and shoot yourself
[ ] Actually post something relevant
[ ] Read the FAQ
[ ] stick to FidoNet and come back when you've grown up
[ ] Apologize to everybody in this newsgroup
[ ] consume excrement
[ ] consume excrement and thus expire
[ ] Post your tests to alt.test/misc.test
[ ] Put your home phone number in your ads from now on
[ ] Refrain from posting until you have a vague idea what you're doing


In Closing, I'd Like to Say:

[ ] You need to seek psychiatric help
[ ] Take your gibberish somewhere else
[ ] *plonk*
[ ] Learn how to post or get off the usenet
[ ] Most of the above
[ ] All of the above
[ ] Some of the above, not including All of the above
[X] You are so clueless that I didn't even bother filling in this form.


------------------------end "standardized form"----------------------------

P.S.:
You are hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly,
deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent,
opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted,
racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged, imbecilic,
insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, byzantine,
conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic,
spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb,
evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative,
paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic,
diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive,
dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim,
unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive,
mind-numbing, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive, abusive,
socially-retarded, puerile, clueless, and generally Not Good.

 

'Tis better to be a bonehead than a 541thead.

 

For every scientist doing research, there must be 9 journalists writing buzz word articles on climate change.

Does anyone have a theory for how humans can burn unlimited amounts of fuel and change the vegetation and not change the climate?

 

Does anyone have a theory of the contrary.

 

Post Number 532 is the dumbest post I ever read on this forum.

 

its all becoming a weapon of mass distraction to stop everyone looking at the financial Armageddon the US is facing ( whilst making some very rich)

 

Year 1804 Lewis and Clark said it was being hot at 96 above 0

http://www.pbs.org/cgi-registry/lewisandclark/journalsbystate?s=kansas&offset=61

Global warming on June 30, 1804

 

Oh dear... Been off-line for ten days [some bar-steward disconnected my power supply, so no interweb!], I've obviously missed an episode or two... But the literary 'fire-fights' are as active as ever I see... [with my Machiavellian circuits switched on, I revel in the downfall of nerds...].

Good posts and bad posts.

Good posts inform and furnish us with the fodder of thought, are challenging and thus stimulating. They offer insight and incentive to learn, unless of course, one 'knows it all'...

Bad posts do the opposite... Perhaps one should review the Monty Python sketch entitled: 'Is This The Right Room For An Argument?'...

Though somewhat surprised, I can understand why Imaginary Number [Zero] posted his highly sardonic 'Standardized Bonehead Reply Form'; much of the posts are [to quote some of the aforementioned sketch...], merely 'connective series of statements intended to present an opposing point of view...', without necessarily involving any 'knowledge'. The 'Devil's Advocate' may also play a role in this. Some people just like to express nothing...

As I write, my brave Greenpeace colleagues are climbing a solid wall of glass ['The Shard' in London...], in order to convey to Shell Petroleum and the world that we MUST NOT exploit the Arctic. Irrespective of what the various implications may be environmentally, the point is that we must stop this '****'. In the same way you would intervene if it were your sister... [or father] at risk.

Bring in the facts: of a multitude of physical 'side effects' such as methane release[as correctly posted by other...], chemical changes leading to deoxygenation,, changes in salinity and thus density, which in turn affects the various major deep ocean currents ['The Atlantic Conveyor'] and surface currents ['The Gulf Stream'], reduction in the reflective coefficient ['The Albedo Effect'], etc... And I havn't even started on the effluent or disruption to a pristine ecosystem by heavy industrial operations... And the argument stands up for itself.

Modern Earth Sciences encompass an extremely dynamic range of processes and attempt to understand their interrelations. So Yes, sometimes the questions are harder than the answers...
____________________________________________________________
"...At periscope depth Herr Kaleun..."
"Very well, sonar Contacts?"
"Three contacts logged Herr Kaleun!"
"Very well, up attack periscope, load tubes one through four, open bow doors...".
"Target one, classify as... Deep ocean drilling vessel... Bearing 265, range twelve-hundred meters, angle on the bow eighteen degrees"
"Tube one ready..."
"Tube one, standby... Tube one - LOOSE!"
"Down Attack Periscope"

 

Water seeks its own level. Think of this in both literal and figurative ways.