TP52s

Frank Mighetto,

I have asked on numerous occasions and bulletin boards for you to refrain from including me in your communications. You lack of consideration in this matter has me believing that you either ignored or have misunderstood my requests.

Leave me alone. Do not include me in your communications.

Sudie Parker

 

"Wasn't that why SH boats were allowed to race with that ratio up until 1999 and are grandfathered in even today. Instead of reacting as the TP52 rules demonstrate with a requirement of 128 stability shouldn't water ballast be considered instead because the flat, thin, planing, water ballasted, center boarded extreme sailing machines took the exact same storm at about the same place and did so without undo problems and single handed under sail!"

You arrogant asswipe. You bigoted, boorish bullshitting buffoon. You cranky conniving c......no, let's stop there.

You are perhaps the most dishonest liar I have ever come across.

Frank, you have been told time and time again that the S-H boats were hundreds of miles from the area where the Around Alone boats were sailing. There was a whole STATE between them AND the 180 miles of Bass Strait. There was about 400+ miles between the S-H fleet and the Around Alone.

You have been shown copies from the logs of the AA boats that prove this. You have been shown maps. You have been shown weather reports. And yet you lack the maturity, the manhood, the common decency to retract this sort of lie.That's only to be expected from a coward and a bully like you.

And even YOU, you ignorant muddle-headed stew of pus, you up-yourself emodiment of all things crappy, eve YOU should have been able to work out by now that the AA boats are FAT FAT FAT - 20' beam or more. They are the beamiest of big boats. Their seaworthiness points out exactly why your pathetic little scrap of plastic pool toy should never see a real ocean.

You really are the lowest form of human being.

 

CT 249

Frank, you have been told time and time again that the S-H boats were hundreds of miles from the area where the Around Alone boats were sailing. There was a whole STATE between them AND the 180 miles of Bass Strait. There was about 400+ miles between the S-H fleet and the Around Alone.

What a treat, CT 249. OK guy cough it up. What do you know about that builder who is known for Sydney Hobart fleet boats that is also producing Mac26x vessels?

 

Sudie Parker, that will happen as soon as you resign as a PHRF Handicaper. It has taken us almost two years to identify you. What a shame that you turn out to be one of those we look to for rating our vessels and support in getting our kind on to the race courses. One whoes duty is to grow the sport and not restrict it by excluding vessels you do not understand. You can do the sport and PHRF NW much good by getting out of the way. Get out of the way and stop posting under other handels. Send your thugs to the showers. For those interested in the power of the Gal see.

http://www.phrf-nw.org/PDF.%20forms/JAN05_23BMTG.pdf

Lets see a Tripp 47 in the Secretary Series. Oh never enough water to float your boat - is there Note smiley. As fate has it I will be sailing a slightly smaller Tripp in about 6 weeks. Take Care, Sexy Little Amish Girl May your sail into the sunset be a pleasent one. Its Sailing Anarchy now that there is IRC. http://www.sailinganarchy.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21317&st=100

I try to be charming

Frank L. Mighetto
Member US Sailing
Member PHRF
Member SSSS - home of kick arse sailors like me

 

Geez, Frank. There are probably thousands of others in this world who don't like their rating, but they don't turn into a friggin' internet libeler/slanderer/stalker like you because of it. Is that what it all boils down to--Tripp Gal is the handicapper who "done ya wrong?"

 

Hey Frank. Do you like apples?

{Loss of stability while powering..
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:17 pm Post subject: Loss of stability while powering

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Has anyone encountered this problem? I have a '96 I have seen it with both my old 50 HP Mercury and my new ETEC 90. In rare occasions while powering at 18 MPH or higher I lose directional stability. Ballast is empty, rudders are up and the centerboard is fully up (I have verified the latter.) Last weekend it occurred after I was passed from astern by two powerboats, one on each side of me. The wakes were quite small; maybe 12 to 18 inches. As the wakes hit my stern quarters, the bow started to wander and the boat started to heel back and forth from one side to another. These oscillations continued to increase in severity with each oscillation. It feels to me that if I were to continue high speed powering, the boat would quickly roll over on its side. It's not unlike what happens when you forger to bring the centerboard all the way up and try a high speed turn except that the boat oscillates from side to side instead of just heeling away from the turn. I've learned that the only way to recover is to immediately chop the power. This brings the boat back under control.

I'm speculating that the problem is related to the fact that at high speed, the forward section of the hull is out of the water and the boat is planing on the aft half of the hull. Would adjusting the motor mount to try and bring the bow down help? Has anyone else experienced this and/or found a solution?

Thanks is advance.

Bob Cameron
Spirit of the Wind

 

Wow Frank, what a perfect example of defamation of character and harassment at the same time. You truly are no better than the slime that covers the bottom of your boat. You repeatedly attack a woman who does nothing other than volunteer her time to the sport of sailing. It has been proven time and again that your claims are nothing more than lies and fantasy. I really hope that you get all that is coming to you and more in a court of law. You have got to be the worlds ultimate sore loser.

 

Geez, Frank. There are probably thousands of others in this world who don't like their rating, but they don't turn into a friggin' internet libeler/slanderer/stalker like you because of it. Is that what it all boils down to--Tripp Gal is the handicapper who "done ya wrong?"

Lets call her Sudie Parker from now on. No public figure should hide behind a comic book name. She obviously knows that she has been doing evil and hence the handle. I do the sport great service by identifying her publically.

Sudie Parker has yanked the balls off of many a sailing man and not just one of mine. Tonight Lightening Rod Tharp will be holding his Performance Sailing Seminar in Olympia. These seminars promote the Bethewaite sailing style. Lightening Rod will never post on the Internet again because of Sudie who called him a "Little Man" on The South Sound Sailing Society board. It is this kind of loss to the sport that is intollerable.


In Puget Sound, we know how to avoid Suidie Parker and her kind for the most part. We simply join clubs where she isn't the rater. Clubs like South Sound Sailing Society, Tacoma Yacht Club and Olympia Yacht club. And we strongly support IRC. I am proposing that the reason clubs in her rating area have declined in membership is owing to her and the reason we will soon be racing IRC is owing to her. But again she is but symptom, a pimple on the larger problem that gave us the Seattle entry in the last Americas cup.

It was owing to Sudie Parker stalking that the SSSS Board was shut down. It is owing to her that we do not have an SSSS Assistant Race Chair.

Sudie should be coughing up the ********* of sailing men she has harmed big time, right now. A man has to do what a man has to do and that involves reclaiming ********* She literally is distroying PHRF - NW. IRC would be no where as popular as it is becoming had she represented the sport appropriately by supporting retractable foils and movable ballast as ISAF directed when it changed rules 51 and 52 to allow them, seven years ago.

She is not just politically incorrect by supporting the big fixed fin boats, ensuring that the little boats do not get rated appropriately for foil retraction. (Those who do battle must learn to retract their *********. ), she is also geographically incorrect.

You do not have a Central West Virgina or a Central Carolina. It is East or West or North or South. You do not send men and woman central. Good young designers go west.

Sudie Parker rates boats for "Central Puget Sound". This area doesn't exist. She has carved out a section of the Sound purposefully to promote the big boats at the detriment of the vessels that US Sailing now holds out to be the future of not only yacht design but also the sailing sport in the US. She isn't getting out of the way. Those of honor must now do battle.

Let her engage me here. Or let her return the balls she as bitten off of Dan Decker, Steve Worcester, Rod Tharp, Ian Christopher, Scot Tempesta, Sean Trew, and my self. One thing is certain. She never more will be effective as a rater. Long after the world forgets mighetto, they will remember that there is something wrong with a woman who likes being called a Gal.

I have now made my sailor's confession. The church of FOYD is in operation on Sailing Anarchy. Mr. Ed is presiding.

PS, The SSSS rater is fantastic. I have no trouble at all with Murrelet's rating. There is a Gal related story there if you want to hear it. It is related to design.

 

Man you are F'ed in the head Frank. Do you actually believe what you just posted? Show PROOF in every point you made in that last post. Not "your word", but actual proof. Otherwise, be a man and retract your lies.

 

Man you are F'ed in the head Frank. Do you actually believe what you just posted? Show PROOF in every point you made in that last post. Not "your word", but actual proof. Otherwise, be a man and retract your lies.

Oh come on. A man from Michigan. Read this thread from its start. Then consider that evidence of wrong doing has now been removed from Sailing Anarchy, the South Sound Sailing Society Bullitine Board, and Sailnet. If you read from the beginning you will find that I was contacted by a desiger from your area, confirming the notion that builders and designers are PAID not to deliver superior model sail boats. The same is true with Internet sites. Board operators are PAID to shut them down to remove evidence.

Sudie Parker refuses to state publically that she has no ties to Jim Teeters. That "taking the 4th" is enough proof for a court of public opinion. Let her engage me directly and publically. We are a forgiving nation. Let us hear her confession. (Air America - I still have troubles with it but what the heck) Mr Ed is waiting on Sailing Anarchy.

 

You were kicked out of Sailing Anarchy and Sailnet. The admin of the SSSS board has informed you of why that board was shut down. None of this was done to remove "evidence", it was done because you are a habitual liar who refuses to accept reality. Again, post proof of the accusations you have made or delete your lies.

 

A historically typical "Frank" response. A LOT of BS that dances around the issue, isn't substantiated, doesn't answer the question, and these days, is mostly just personal insults.

Did Sudie assign you the 241 I see on your PHRF roster line, Frank? If not, what's your beef? What is it about that 241 that drives you to such obsession, Frank?

 

You were kicked out of Sailing Anarchy and Sailnet. The admin of the SSSS board has informed you of why that board was shut down. None of this was done to remove "evidence", it was done because you are a habitual liar who refuses to accept reality. Again, post proof of the accusations you have made or delete your lies.

Well OK. Lets first pin down the accusation. I acuse Sudie Parker of unsportsman like behavior that includes dishonering PHRF NW and US Sailing. The last straw was her Swiftsure stunt that put a man overboard in danger. Instead of immediately withdrawing from the race (which is what Seahorse International says is normal after ripping a main sail) she dittled around without engine power allowing the boat to broach and putting the man in the water in the first place. Then while sailing back to the MOB, she refusing to use her engine, or succesfully broadcast the event on radio. This Man overboard could well have been Scott Awalt a member of South Sound Sailing Society who had previously to this event been one of her bow men. Scott has not had a ball removed by Sudie yet and remains a supporter. His time will come. I aim to save it. Scott instead had called for the reef. I acuse Sudie of operating an unseaworthy vessel in the Swiftsure because she never learned to reef and had never reefed her vessel. I suspect that someone put in a rule 69 report against Sudie owing to that. Possibly a witness on White Cloud. The deadline was a week or so ago. But it wasn't me. I had earlier put in a 69 report, the draft which was reviewed on this forum (less the names) and lost one of my ********* because I withdrew that report, something I greatly regret because it was predictive of what happened in the Swiftsure.

Think this through from the perspective of one charged with Board repsonsibilties. I see this kind of thing. I know it is my duty to speak out. I also know that the club has purchased insurance that protects my family wealth from the kind of screw up that happened with Sudie Parker during the Swiftsure. (by the way my replacement likely is not coverred). But Scott, a man I have sailed with, a man that now is retracting his center plank on his S2 7.9, a man who regardless of the ill he may speak of me can always rely on my friendship, could have lost his life owing to the ways of Sudie Parker.

Now again, she is just the symptom of the bigger problem, a pimple on something we call big boat racing. This TP52 Trader Fred business is part of that. Seahourse International is supporting the notion that an electrical fire, like the ripping of the main sheet, should result in the Captain withdrawing his vessel from any racing activity.

The evidence of the above, a letter penned by Sudie herself and posted on Sailing Anarchy has been removed. Except there is a copy on this thread with my comments.

Engage?

 

Again when presented with fact, you respond with lies and fantasy. There is nothing here to "engage", only your demented fantasies.

 

The real story of the events during the 2005 Swiftsure.