Fresh Water Resistance

Discussion in 'Propulsion' started by Izugarrin, Mar 19, 2011.

  1. Izugarrin
    Joined: Mar 2011
    Posts: 10
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Spain

    Izugarrin Student

    Hi all,

    I've notice in an electric motor web about presizing the engine a boat needs. And they give a enormous importance to the water the boat is floating on: if it´s salty the power is twice than if it is fresh.

    You can see it here: http://www.kraeutler.at/motor_details_en/items/26.html

    Lets see, the viscosity of the sea water is going to increase around 1.04 times, increasing the viscous resistance but the volume displaced by the hull is going to decrease (reducing the wetted surface a little bit, around the 0.991 times for that in fresh water reducing the viscous resistance).

    For a sailing boat: (V 6 knts and Lwl = 7.7 m)

    Reynolds in fresh water = 20848537
    Rn in salt water = 19972548

    ITTC 57 frictional resistance coeficient

    fresh water = 0.002651
    salt water = 0.002669

    now taking the added wetted surface:
    fresh 1 * 0.002651
    salt 0.991 * 0.002669= 0.002646

    The resistance in salt water is 0.998 times less!!!

    Well Hullspeed from Maxsurf software gives for fresh water 1.78 kW (100 efficiency) and 1.83 kW for sea water what makes it 1.02801 times higher!

    this with a Puma 29 feet (Spanish sailboats shipyard, designed by fomous Primrose) for 6 knts and a displacement of 4 tonnes.


    On other hand the propeller is going to work in a fluid of a greater density, absorbing more power...

    Well my question is wich of this conclusions is wrong, and why this electric motor manufacter gives to it so much importance!

    Thanks,

    Good winds
     
  2. CDK
    Joined: Aug 2007
    Posts: 3,324
    Likes: 148, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1819
    Location: Adriatic sea

    CDK retired engineer

    For all practical purposes the resistance in fresh and salt water is equal.

    Krautler states that a particular 10 KW electric motor is suitable for 4 tons displacement in fresh water and 2 tons in seawater because the sailing conditions at sea are much more demanding (current, wind, waves, distance to shore).

    Also at sea there will be much more marine growth increasing drag and reducing propulsion.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Izugarrin
    Joined: Mar 2011
    Posts: 10
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Spain

    Izugarrin Student

    Hi CDK,

    Thanks for your reply. That is an importatnt factor that I didn´t realize. Take it into account since now!

    Cheers!
     
  4. DMacPherson
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 139
    Likes: 28, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 209
    Location: Durham, NH USA

    DMacPherson Senior Member

    Look for the article "Performance differences in fresh and salt water" in the October 2005 Marine Performance Technology Exchange newsletter. You can find it at:

    www.hydrocompinc.com/knowledge/library.htm


    Don MacPherson
    HydroComp, Inc.
     
    1 person likes this.

  5. Izugarrin
    Joined: Mar 2011
    Posts: 10
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Spain

    Izugarrin Student

    HydroComp

    Thanks! This is a really interesting web that you have!

    I have enjoyed myself reading that article as it says that not a final conclusion can be taken for all cases.
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.