What Do We Think About Climate Change

Just in case Boston is still posting that nonsense about 97% blah, blah, blah, here is how the figure was derived, or should I say devined, by the College of Cardinals of the Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming.................

http://joannenova.com.au/2011/01/what-does-it-take-for-a-worldwide-consensus-just-75-opinions/

And now, let the personal attacks continue!

 

i don't trust anyone not on the payroll of big energy about agw

after all they are paid to tell me what big energy wants me to know, and that's good enough for me

 

If the winters are warm is global warming, if they are record lows it is global warming too. It explains everything.

 

So show us the evidence that refutes it. You can't do it. You're reduced to sneering at science and calling it a religion -- as though the scientists who believe their observations, their instruments and their calculations are the ones mired in an irrational belief system, instead of you.

Do you have any idea at all how lame that sounds, to people with even a modicum of common sense? You're right up there with Young Earth Creationists -- and the Taliban who banned paper bags in Afghanistan, because they're made of recycled paper and might include the pages of a Koran....

 

Ya gotta love how Sloweddy makes a personal attack, and then ducks behind the accusation of others making personal attacks. Kinda like the pot calling the kettle black eh. Also of interest is the right wing article misrepresenting the consensus process.

Gonzo
initially the effects of the greenhouse gasses were thought to be limited to simple warming but then a greater understanding of the climate response was gained through direct observation and it is now known that the alterations in the atmospheric chemistry result in a much wider range of responses.

cheers
B

 

Gosh, I must have missed the part where they refuted the evidence about the phoney survey numbers that Boston been posting for years.

I've been away because Boston & Troy's inability to deal with anyone elses ego other than their own just got too boring and repetitive. I see also that the king and the clown prince of personal and ad hominem attacks continue to ***** about everyone else who even mildly approach their level of nastiness. I leave you two sufferers of anal/cranial inversion to yourselve again. But just for fun I'll pop back in in a few months to piss you off again. So for now, continue with your circle jerk of voodoo science and keep telling yourself, 97%, it's the coldest year ever, 97%, it's the coldest year ever in the dogmatic mantra you've developed.

Keep up the good work boys!

 

piss us off
hardly
I typically get a good laugh out of just about everything you post
for instance
the personal attacks followed by complaining about personal attacks. Then more personal attacks followed by more accusations of personal attacks.
either wallow in it or not but the schizophrenic love hate thing is laughable at the least
then of course there's the content of your diatribes
yikes
clearly educated in the ultra right-wing hall of disinformation

oh well
feel free to take as long a vacation as possible
love
B

 

yawn shudder brrr

 

Well, no. It isn't the coldest year ever worldwide, by anyone's reckoning at all. Where do you even come up with this crap? No wonder you don't hang around more.... you embarrass yourself every time you show up.

 

Re: "anal/cranial inversion" - David Birge calls this the "Klein Bottle" because, he says "like Ezra, its ability to talk out of its own ***."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/12/yes_the_constitution_is_bindin.html

I think it is also used as a beaker in AGW type science!
In all fainess, after the coldest last three months of the year ever here, it is raining yesterday and today. Nice - ice. This climate is so screwed up, it must be AGW. "Quick, borrow money from the Chinese and throw it at the problem!"

 

Actually, according to NASA 2010 was the HOTTEST year on record

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/post-carbon/2010/12/2010_hottest_climate_year_on_r.html

 

ya Sloweddy is typically wrong about such things so don't be surprised Cthippo; its just kinda his way, that and the hypocritical finger pointing

Mark
that thing is a kinda poor rendition of a mobius
artists air conditioner must have broken down or maybe he would have finished the rendering.

 

sneer

 

Yes NASA says what the Obaminator tells them to say. In case you haven't noticed, their mission has changed.

http://milesmathis.com/peg.html

 

http://thematrixhasyou.org/nasa-chemtrails.html