The perfect Passagemaker IV, Equipment

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by apex1, Sep 3, 2010.

?

Please choose after reading the threads! multiple choice possible.

  1. I need a second Radar

    8 vote(s)
    53.3%
  2. One Radar is enough

    7 vote(s)
    46.7%
  3. A intergrated bridge system would be nice

    10 vote(s)
    66.7%
  4. Inmarsat is a must on passages (how would I post on bd.net?)

    7 vote(s)
    46.7%
  5. I am fine with SSB radio at sea and shouting in port.

    2 vote(s)
    13.3%
  6. A bus system is sensible and desired

    11 vote(s)
    73.3%
  7. Aircondition in all rooms

    6 vote(s)
    40.0%
  8. AC in sleeping quarters only

    5 vote(s)
    33.3%
  9. AC in living quarters only

    3 vote(s)
    20.0%
  10. Walk in fridge/freeze is a must

    4 vote(s)
    26.7%
  11. A household fridge is enough, I like my beer lukewarm

    6 vote(s)
    40.0%
  12. Hydraulic stabilizers are my choice (for Trawler)

    7 vote(s)
    46.7%
  13. The Trawler does fine with paravanes

    3 vote(s)
    20.0%
  14. I need a sternthruster

    1 vote(s)
    6.7%
  15. first forgotten item

    3 vote(s)
    20.0%
  16. second

    3 vote(s)
    20.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. apex1

    apex1 Guest

    A bit meager the poll, just 15 voters only.

    But interesting to see, that we have only one here who needs a sternthruster. But 11 vote for having a bus system installed. As interesting that just 6 need AC in all quarters but 7 are fine with less.

    More voters?
     
  2. srimes
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 283
    Likes: 30, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 214
    Location: Oregon

    srimes Senior Member

    Many times people won't vote because they either don't know or don't care. And I think that's usually a good thing so they don't dilute the votes of those who have formed stronger opinions (just look at efforts like MTV's "Rock the Vote" and what that's got us).

    Seeing how popular these "Perfect Passagemaker" threads are, I'm guessing that many don't know enough to make a choice. Like me. Now, hold up more boat pictures and I can point to the one that makes me go "OOOO, Pretty!" like the 1st poll :D.
     
  3. apex1

    apex1 Guest

    Good point, though I have no clue about MTV´s polls, I don´t waste my time with TV.

    But posting fancy pictures of the equipment might be not the solution too.?

    [​IMG]

    the Navnet 3D control panel.
    http://www.furunousa.com/products/p...NavNet 3D : NavNet 3D Multi Function Displays
     
  4. mydauphin
    Joined: Apr 2007
    Posts: 2,161
    Likes: 53, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 575
    Location: Florida

    mydauphin Senior Member

    A lot depends on the type of cruising people do. I person who does not dock a lot, may not need a stern thruster. A person in the tropics like me needs a AC in every room because I will faint if I have to work in engine room in 95 degree weather. I don't need a heater much, only may be 2 weeks out of year in bathroom. Haven't had a water heater so far this year, will need one in December. So everything is relative to type of crusing and location.
     
  5. Landlubber
    Joined: Jun 2007
    Posts: 2,640
    Likes: 125, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1802
    Location: Brisbane

    Landlubber Senior Member

    ...yes, and no...the "perfect" passagemaker would have those pieces of gear on board for when it is making passage in areas that require that sort of gear....
     
  6. Brian@BNE
    Joined: Jan 2010
    Posts: 262
    Likes: 13, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 151
    Location: Brisbane, Australia

    Brian@BNE Senior Member

    Ok, I took the prod and voted. Hope I don't distort expert opinions:p

    I think most items are straightforward for a pragmatic cruiser. Those wanting all the bling but weekend/occasional week aboard only, gin-palaces and other look-how-rich-I-am boats, are a completely different market segment anyway.
     
  7. apex1

    apex1 Guest

    Brian,
    you are aware of these specifications?

    http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/bo...r-style-within-genre-34092-19.html#post402405
     
  8. Brian@BNE
    Joined: Jan 2010
    Posts: 262
    Likes: 13, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 151
    Location: Brisbane, Australia

    Brian@BNE Senior Member

    Richard, yes I've followed all the threads with great interest. I might have expressed myself poorly above. What I am trying to say is that commercial vessel specs are about right, a few extra luxuries are OK, but some things are not really needed and might just be extra maintenance in the long run.

    So, integrated bridge system not needed. Shouting in port is for the great unwashed masses. Aircon in sleeping areas only - anyone who lives in the tropics would say this. Lukewarm beer is only for the Brits. Paravanes work. Seamanship instead of sternthruster.

    I've saved your trawler spec list. Now I'm onto saving pennies to be able to ante up.

    Love the threads. I'd desperately like to think your 20m lower limit for a serious passagemaker could be squeezed down to 17m - for Tad's PML 56. But I keep looking at that GA for it and thinking I'd like more... So its getting to the point of 'like' versus 'need', with budget probably going to rule anyway.
     
  9. apex1

    apex1 Guest

    Thanks Brian,

    the last 3m I would say are not the drama. I said it often enough, empty hull costs nothing. The trouble is, that all boaters start to think about the next gimmick they could install in these additional spaces. Just skimp on that, and you have the speed, the economy, the better behaviour, all for very few pennies.
    And I said on another thread, a decent 20m boat with room like a 14 -15m craft could be done at about half to 60% of the Trawler I mentioned above.
    Of course with several items less.

    Regards
    Richard
     
  10. Brian@BNE
    Joined: Jan 2010
    Posts: 262
    Likes: 13, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 151
    Location: Brisbane, Australia

    Brian@BNE Senior Member

    I think I'll have to forget the passagemaking, and use available space for the must-have stuff, plus the odd gimmick, and forgo some range. Having a 'coastal cruiser' will be fine most of the time, and island hopping slower speed cruise will still get to a lot of places anyway.
     
  11. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,786
    Likes: 1,688, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    What about an EPRIB...liferaft etc.??

    Or too obvious?
     
  12. apex1

    apex1 Guest

  13. dskira

    dskira Previous Member

    Also it will be a great help to have a hawse pipe on the stern with an anchor ready to be used.
    The windlass which can be smaller than the fore one, can be hidden under a grating.
    The passerelle can be used mediterranean fashion the crew boarding on top of the grating. Of course I will use this system only on a double ended style.

    A boarding ladder also in the side, with a door in the bulwark.
    Daniel
     
  14. mydauphin
    Joined: Apr 2007
    Posts: 2,161
    Likes: 53, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 575
    Location: Florida

    mydauphin Senior Member

    Excellent points - I can't believe this is not standard equipment in most larger boats.
     

  15. apex1

    apex1 Guest

    Both standard Daniel! I specified the stern anchor and the hydraulic passerelle in the post linked above! And the stern windlass is a vertical capstan type, which can be used for mooring (docking) also. That is a great help when docking stern to, as it is common in most marinas.
    The boarding ladder/platform is planned on both sides. If there is only one (as it was the case on one of my own boats), you have difficulties boarding the tender when moored with the ladder towards the pier.

    Regards
    Richard
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.