calculating laminate thickness

Discussion in 'Materials' started by dionysis, Sep 4, 2004.

  1. Dutch Peter
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 645
    Likes: 7, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 66
    Location: The Netherlands

    Dutch Peter Senior Member

    Just for the hack of it:

    Lloyd's SSC Rules - nominal thickness of an individual ply:


    m*{(Pa/f) - (Pa-Pr)}
    ------------------- = thickness of individual ply
    1000 * Pa * Pr

    m = mass of reinforcement in individual ply.
    Pa = spec. gravity of reinforcement in individual ply.
    f = fibre content by weight, of individual ply.
    Pr = spec. gravity of resin in individual ply.

    At the end you just add up.

    Because this is a class calculation I presume it's pretty conservative, but that's better then 30% + or -.
     
  2. dionysis
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 258
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 44
    Location: Tasmania, Australia

    dionysis Senior Member

    Thanks Dutch Peter. I have enough now to learn how to do it from first principles. That way I understand instead of blindly following along.
     
  3. sorenfdk
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 511
    Likes: 27, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 394
    Location: Denmark

    sorenfdk Yacht Designer

    I'm sorry - I am not sure that I understand your questions!

    How could you tell?
    If you mean "How could you tell that +/- 30% sounds interesting"? Well - a margin of error of that magnitude on a formula referred to by one of the really BIG players in marine composites (SP Systems) sounds interesting to me!

    Have you read that in some book or in some URL?
    Read what?

    Please explain!
     
  4. Slowmo
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 38
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Scandinavia

    Slowmo Junior Member

    Huuh !
     
  5. Dutch Peter
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 645
    Likes: 7, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 66
    Location: The Netherlands

    Dutch Peter Senior Member

    Slowmo,

    You're clearly lost for word, otherwise you would have given an answer that makes sence, I'm sure.
    Ofcourse you can come up with a foam that absorbs more resin than the fibres, but Sorendfk means foams normally used in boatbuilding, and not in aviation or aerospace application.
    I'm sure that's the confusion.
     
  6. sorenfdk
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 511
    Likes: 27, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 394
    Location: Denmark

    sorenfdk Yacht Designer

    I only asked because I would like to know, but if you don't want to share your knowledge and/or experience like most of us here, then that's entirely up to you...

    BTW, one of your earlier postings seems to have disappeared! It was the one with the question "How could you tell?" Did you delete it? If so, then why? I would still like an answer...
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2004

  7. sorenfdk
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 511
    Likes: 27, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 394
    Location: Denmark

    sorenfdk Yacht Designer

    Slowmo (or Morgan or whatever your name/alias is):

    A long time ago, I asked you a question. Why don't you answer?
    And why would I would I want you to answer? Just because I'd like to see you admit (here or on marinan.com) that you are dead wrong!
    Come on - show some of the netiquette you have asked of others!
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.