Towing Vessel Stability

Discussion in 'Stability' started by Nigel1, Dec 5, 2007.

  1. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    At first sight it seems to be a narrow boat with big winches. Also the bollard pull seems only feasible if transverse thursters are not working. I would like very much to to have a look at the adopted stability criteria and the loading and working conditions studied.

    Cheers.
     
  2. Guest-3-12-09-9-21
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 154
    Likes: 13, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 146
    Location: United States

    Guest-3-12-09-9-21 Senior Member

    They have a stability program for this vessel - I have no idea about the specifics. I am going to try and go over there at some point this fall to get some time on a DP 2 vessel. I will try to find out something then.

    I agree with the narrow observation. I also am not too fond of the shallow hull and thrusters being so close to the surface when at a light draft.
    --Chuck
     
  3. charmc
    Joined: Jan 2007
    Posts: 2,391
    Likes: 78, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 840
    Location: FL, USA

    charmc Senior Member

    Quick impressions from an "experienced layman":

    " Continuous" bollard pull seems optimistic for the rated power output, even given nozzles, and thrusters off.

    Based on dimensions, just wondering how stability will be affected significantly by loaded stores? If so, is working under extreme AH conditions to be recommended without the vessel carrying max stores?

    HP seems light for an AHTS of that hull length. I note the emphasis on "eco friendly" design. Today that seems to mean sacrificing power for greeness. Does that create an oxymoron? The vessel seems built for less than extreme (medium duty) anchor handling, i.e. not for the depths the new rigs are working at. Is there a standard for determining vessel job assignments? This design has more power than a straight supply vessel, but significantly less than BD and others of similar length. Are there subcatagories within the AHTS type?

    I don't know how valid any of these thoughts are. Those of you who have the design and operating experience in this field will know if there is merit in any of these questions/observations.
     
  4. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    In my opinion 120 Mt bollard pull is about right for the 10.728 HP if applied to the main propellers in an efficient configuration (A rough number is BP =+/- 1% HP, being efficient systems slightly over that).

    Narrow beam will not allow to carry the load of the 400 Mt winch much forward over the side in an emergency (Another candidate for a BD like accident?).

    Cheers.
     
  5. charmc
    Joined: Jan 2007
    Posts: 2,391
    Likes: 78, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 840
    Location: FL, USA

    charmc Senior Member

    Just curious; is that formula for engine rated HP or net HP at the shafts?
     
  6. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    This is just an statistical relationship between nominal HP and bollard pull for a series of tugs I've had the opportunity to appraise.
     
  7. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

  8. Nigel1
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 53
    Likes: 4, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 55
    Location: Manchester UK

    Nigel1 Junior Member

    Yep, should have fitted that gog rope.
    Classic tug boat error

    Nigel
     
  9. murdomack
    Joined: Jun 2007
    Posts: 309
    Likes: 23, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 282
    Location: Glasgow

    murdomack New Member

    There is something about the specs that interests me. The weights, etc. are quoted in Lt and Mt when I know that US (short) tons are in common use over there. Coupled to this we have volumes in USG and BBLs and pumping rates in GPM which I know from conversion of the Metric figures is US gallons.
    My question is; are Long tons the standard used in measuring US shipping weights?

    Murdo
     

  10. Nigel1
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 53
    Likes: 4, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 55
    Location: Manchester UK

    Nigel1 Junior Member

Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.