Wavecutter BreeZer-33

I want to share my new project. Appreciate if you send your opinions .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GgdOcOTz54

 

The boat seems not to be sitting on its waterline at 1:01, was that without the engine ? It certainly has a distinct appearance, with the mini-aircraft carrier bows, but what else is different other than it being a fairly lightweight, narrow-ish moderate vee planing hull, with wide flats at the chine ?

 

BreeZer-33

Thank you for all your questions.I'm going to answer and explain the difference between BreeZer-33 and others with all details tomorrow. ( very busy day is today ). I hope you will be in toch tomorrow to read my reply .

 

Difference :"BreeZer-33" and other flybridge cruisers

Hi. i am ready to explaine the difference " BreeZer-33" and other Flybridge Cuisers.
1) This is the combination of deep V-hull and catamaran.I designed the deep V hull with ricing reverse chine from middle to bow , making bow sharp entry 54 degrees. Half angle of entry is JUST only 20.5 degrees.This is why Breezer-33
a) has less wave resistance compare other boats no large .
b) has no large bow wave ( also compare others)
I made catamaran shape for aft , moving engine set up place from transom ( typical for other boat) to midship line .( I did replace boat center of gravity )
As a combination of CG- correction and V hull design BreeZer-33 has one more difference point:
c) boat accelerating without bow lifting.
You did ask about picture of BreeZer-33, with chine above water line . The boat on the picture was just empty( no engine and ect...)
I appreciate your questions and ( I hope0 interes. I saw you are from Australia. Aren't you ? I published my article about Boat for t Middle Class in Australian megazine few years ago, and had many replays from Australian readers. Thank you, if any question, I will be happy to answer .