How to know if a design's righting moment is enough?

Discussion in 'Stability' started by PhilippeCE, Apr 16, 2022.

  1. PhilippeCE
    Joined: Apr 2022
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 4, Points: 3
    Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    PhilippeCE Junior Member

    BlueBell likes this.
  2. AlanX
    Joined: Mar 2022
    Posts: 113
    Likes: 21, Points: 28
    Location: Perth, Western Australia

    AlanX Senior Member

    I did that, It capsized the first outing, had to add ballast:
    76.jpg

    Worth the effort to realise you have too much sail area.

    It righted easily (builtin water tight bulkheads) but very sore after bailing out a tonne or so of water.

    AlanX
     
    PhilippeCE and BlueBell like this.
  3. PhilippeCE
    Joined: Apr 2022
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 4, Points: 3
    Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    PhilippeCE Junior Member

  4. AlanX
    Joined: Mar 2022
    Posts: 113
    Likes: 21, Points: 28
    Location: Perth, Western Australia

    AlanX Senior Member

  5. PhilippeCE
    Joined: Apr 2022
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 4, Points: 3
    Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    PhilippeCE Junior Member

    @AlanX maybe it would have been more stable if you would have kept the width all the way aft. but that would have changed the style of it.
     
  6. AlanX
    Joined: Mar 2022
    Posts: 113
    Likes: 21, Points: 28
    Location: Perth, Western Australia

    AlanX Senior Member

    @PhilippeCE,

    The far aft section adds little to the righting moment as if has (relatively) little displacement.
    Having said that I would not do a double ended boat again (except for a small cat pontoon or canoe).
    But I am still a fan of the flatiron/sharpie hull shape:
    18' sharpie 6-7-2013 2-45-14 PM.jpg

    Basically, you set boat's balance by setting the bow/stem just in the water.
    As the boat is loaded, the aft/stern just sits lower.
    When heeled, the hull presents a "V" to the water flow.

    Here is a pontoon/catamaran version:
    FlatIronpontoon.png

    Regards AlanX
     
  7. BlueBell
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 2,685
    Likes: 961, Points: 113
    Location: Victoria BC Canada

    BlueBell . . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ _

    100% accurate, easy, cheap, instant and reliable results.
    A formula, hah. Hands on engineering is the way to go.
    And what a learning experience!
    Way to go AlanX.
     
  8. zstine
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Posts: 140
    Likes: 18, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: New Jersey

    zstine Senior Member

    This is covered in the "Principles of Yacht Design" (great book) chapter on sail and rig design. Righting moment is a function of heel angle and yes, you need a righting moment equal to the overturning moment the sails generate. You need to calculate the angle at which the boat has that righting moment and determine for yourself if it is an acceptable angle. In other words, you need to know the boat's righting moment at 'max' heel angle (the angle you want to sail to weather at ~15deg ish(?)). Then you can calculate the wind speed your sail plan would create an equal moment (this would be the wind speed above which you take a reef or otherwise reduce force like flatten the sail/bend the mast, etc). If this is an acceptable wind speed (~14-19knts) then you are good to go. If not, you need to change sail plan or righting moment/ballast. (Sail lateral force) x (distance sailCE to keelCE) = (Righting moment at heel angleX). Calculations of the sail's lateral force can be involved as this is not the overall force, but the vector in the athwartship direction considering mast interference, induced and viscous drag, interaction with a head sail or mizzen sail, etc.. Though estimates can be fairly straight forward as google will tell you. and software such as FreeShip can provide righting moments at different heel angles, so you don't have to do all the hand calcs, which would be very cumbersome to do 100% by hand.

    One comment the PhilippeCE said was that "as the boat heels, the force of the sails decrease". This is not true. Heel impacts the direction/location of the sail's forces, but not the amount of force. It is the change in location of the sail's force (and keel) that creates more weather helm as heel angle increases.
     
  9. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,790
    Likes: 1,714, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    It is correct that as the boat heels the force of the sails decrease. The projected vertical surface area of the sail diminishes as the boat heels. The force applied to the sail is a function of P (pressure) X surface area
     
  10. TANSL
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 7,369
    Likes: 699, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 300
    Location: Spain

    TANSL Senior Member

    Thinking logically it is difficult to imagine how the surface of the sail can vary when the boat heels. The sail is an object that remains intact unless the helmsman orders to reef the sail (perhaps that is not the correct word but I hope you understand me). The component of the force on the sail that pushes the ship can vary with changing heel, but the surface of the sail does not change, except that at lower altitudes the wind speed can be lower.
     
  11. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,790
    Likes: 1,714, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    Please read before commenting. Projected vertical surface area is reduced when a boat heels.
     
  12. TANSL
    Joined: Sep 2011
    Posts: 7,369
    Likes: 699, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 300
    Location: Spain

    TANSL Senior Member

    In that I totally agree, I was wrong and I apologize

    I have read, following your wise advice, and in this I do not agree. The total force on the sail, if the total area does not change and the direction of the wind or its speed does not change, cannot vary. The components of that force on the sail will change but not the "force of the sail" (if I'm not wrong again).
     
    gonzo likes this.
  13. AJB
    Joined: Jul 2021
    Posts: 56
    Likes: 8, Points: 8
    Location: 31 42S 152 04 E

    AJB Junior Member

    Two ideas for guidance:
    1. At 45 degrees of heel the aero force will about 30% less than the upright equivalent.
    2. Calculate the approximate vertical position of the CE and use 4 kg aero force per m2 of area to establish the RM required....
     
  14. AJB
    Joined: Jul 2021
    Posts: 56
    Likes: 8, Points: 8
    Location: 31 42S 152 04 E

    AJB Junior Member

    Oops
    Add 1/2 draft to ce height as well for ce torque lver arm
     

  15. Robert Biegler
    Joined: Jun 2017
    Posts: 166
    Likes: 87, Points: 38
    Location: Trondheim

    Robert Biegler Senior Member

    Isn't it a bit more complicated than that when the sail is not just a drag device at right angles to the wind? Even then, letting the sail tilt away from the wind likely changes the drag coefficient. When the sail acts as a foil, things seem a bit more complicated still.

    For a boundary case, think of apparent wind angle 0 degrees, but with a sail sheeted to give 10 degrees angle of attack, on a hull that doesn't change pitch as the boat heels. That 10 degree angle of attack will remain the same no matter how much the boat heels, and so will the force on the sail.

    For the next case, think of an Atlantic proa at 90 degrees apparent wind, with the sail again trimmed for 10 degrees angle of attack. Say the windward hull is thin enough that its influence on air flow is negligible. As the boat heels, the air no longer flows along the cord, but more and more along the span. And at 90 degrees heel angle, the air will just flow parallel to the mast and the span of the sail, at 0 degrees angle of attack. The two factors that influence sail force are effective span and angle of attack. I think, in this case lift decreases with the square of the cosine of heel angle.

    For a third case, take sailing at 30 degrees apparent, with a sail again trimmed at 10 degrees angle of attack. At 90 degrees heel, the sail would now have -20 degrees angle of attack if the air still flowed parallel to the chord, but the sail is now effectively raked back 30 degrees, with whatever effect that has on the angle of attack.

    Force proportional to projected surface area seems to be a simplification.
     
    Dolfiman likes this.
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.