Global Warming? are humans to blame?

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by hansp77, Sep 11, 2006.

?

Do you believe

  1. Global Warming is occuring as a direct result of Human Activity.

    106 vote(s)
    51.7%
  2. IF Gloabal Warming is occurring it is as a result of Non-Human or Natural Processes.

    99 vote(s)
    48.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ImaginaryNumber
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 436
    Likes: 59, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 399
    Location: USA

    ImaginaryNumber Imaginary Member

    If you are really interested in discussing Global Warming, maybe you'd like to comment on this "inconvenient truth" :

     
  2. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    Boston, you are preaching to the peanut gallery. They know you are being ridiculous, but consider it all good just poking fun. Besides, they don't like my disagreeing with them either.
    But if you are really as inovative as you wish others to think you are, why do you repeat and repeat and repeat the same old refrain? You are boring! Go away sonny, you bore me! :D
     
  3. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    Sure. I never said there hadn't been warming. We were still warming from the little ice age.
    I said no ADDittional warming since 1998, and cooling last 15 months.
    Does the BEST study refute THOSE statements?
    Not in their chart!
    They closely duplicate the other 4 climate agencies.
    That is surprising though, because they ALL use the same data?
    Did All use similar correction algorithyms. All confer together about resolving differences in observations.
    How did BEST duplicate that? Must have used a very similar correction, huh?
    Maybe BEST decided to used 1200 kilometer radius around thermometers to "guestimate" temperatures in blank areas. Just like Hansen!
    Maybe they weren't as objective as they PRETEND to be. :D
    Maybe BEST is a small scam, to convince us to accept the BIGGER scam? hmmm?

    I still believe we will see continued cooling over next several years, and maybe 30 years. :)
     
  4. Boston

    Boston Previous Member

    anyone else notice those parts in red

    Cause one might be led to believe that "all" the BS being foisted off on us by some few deniers, has already been addressed ????

    now wouldn't that be peculiar.
     
  5. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    You believe you are prosecutor, jury, and judge rolled into one. if you make a statement satisfying to you? You declare you won! Topic dismissed with prejudice!
    World doesn't spin on your weenie pal! You aint the judge nor the singing fat lady.
    The debate isn't over simply because you want it to be! :D
     
  6. spork

    spork Previous Member

    <insult directed toward other member removed>

    You have been shown to be wrong in every way on that topic. We were never once dishonest, nor did we lack integrity. We did exactly what we set out to do, and in a few weeks will set a new record for going directly upwind faster than the wind. This will be a whole new opportunity for another meltdown by you.
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. bntii
    Joined: Jun 2006
    Posts: 731
    Likes: 97, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 1324
    Location: MD

    bntii Senior Member

    I would condition this post with the observation that if this goal is so desirable, the existing power structure is most likely to be fully vested in this stratagem.
    It looks at first blush to be a bit off to paint Al Gore and his wind/solar investments as being a new world order raising its ugly head.

    Do you imagine that the greens are even let in the door???
     
  8. variverrunner
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 98
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 85
    Location: New York, USA

    variverrunner Junior Member

    The Great Dreadnought SPEAKS

    Yobbo:

    Yobbly:


    Thanks again for your incredibly commentary. I do wonder how many people believe you ??? Anyone ?????


    Your Dreadnought Polka site is pretty far out!


    Allan
     
  9. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    The First Global Revolution: Blueprint for a new global order, by Club of Rome
    “In searching for the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for cause. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changing attitudes and behaviors that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

    Establishment of the Club of Rome

    Rockefeller's private estate in Bellagio
    In April, 1968, the Club of Rome was founded by members of the original Morgenthau group during a meeting at Rockefeller's private house in Bellagio, Italy. The meeting was organized by Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist who had close relations to the Olivetti Corporation and Fiat. He claimed to have solutions for world peace and prosperity, which could be accomplished through a New World Order.


    http://www.clubofrome.org/
    Rockefellers are descendents, a branch of Rothschilds.
     
  10. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    It's not MY Dreadnought Polka site. You're trying to draw a correlation that doesn't exist. Like a correlation between CO2 and temperature doesn't exist, except in imaginations! :)
    probably very few give ANY credence right now, but as they see events unfold, maybe they'll remember and THINK!
     
  11. variverrunner
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 98
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 85
    Location: New York, USA

    variverrunner Junior Member

    Standardization of Temp Recording sSites

    HoyteDow

    Hoyte, I certainly agree with your idea about the standardization of testing sites. I do wonder about what the standards should be. For urban areas " over grass" test site might not be most the empirical and appropriate ?


    Does anyone know if there is a criteria? beyond the 100 foot rule?


    Allan
     
  12. Boston

    Boston Previous Member

    I think each of the four studies came up with there own criteria, which was something that the Berkley study was designed to address.

    Although I don't think they set a standard for the sampling stations.
     
    1 person likes this.
  13. troy2000
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 1,738
    Likes: 170, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2078
    Location: California

    troy2000 Senior Member

    If that's really the foundation of your world view, we have no common ground to meet on. It means you're cocooned in ignorance, misinformation, paranoia, and a yearning for simple explanations of a complex world.
     
  14. bntii
    Joined: Jun 2006
    Posts: 731
    Likes: 97, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 1324
    Location: MD

    bntii Senior Member

    This sounds like fear.

    You believe there is a 50/50 chance that the new republic will come to euthanize you...
    Really? Are you taking active steps to protect yourself?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Sp-VFBbjpE
     

  15. RayThackeray
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 147
    Likes: 12, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 90
    Location: Alameda, CA, USA

    RayThackeray Senior Member

    Yobbo, I read things like the below with a certain sense of sadness. To be driven by this stuff, as you clearly are, means descending into a psychosis of paranoia.

    Sane people recognize that the very wealthy have too much influence - particularly in American politics where outright bribery is covered up with the euphemism "political contributions" through nefarious means like Super PACs - but the downfall of people like Rupert Murdoch demonstrates that even they have limits. Look what happened to Nicolae Ceaușescu and a couple of middle-eastern despots recently.

    But to link this with global warming as a way of getting control of the population is just plain lunatic rambling. Why would these so-called "illumnati" persist in an unpopular, even failing tactic like trying to convince people that they should accept AGW when the logical thinkg, of course, is that they would preach the opposite to keep their oil company profits high? As, in fact, they actually are doing?

     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.