Conspiracy theories and lost opportunities (just for fun)

Hi Troy,
I am only claiming that the WHOLE truth is NOT IN THE Government reports of the incident. The explanation leaves a lot to be desired and properly explained... so in your first point - You should have sufficient competence and likely 95% of all people in USA but MOTIVE, Opportunity, Benefit - farkedifiknow....

Controlled demolition is the only plausible scenario that meets the visible evidence of a moderately informed distant witness... All other explanations DO NOT HAVE THE RING OF TRUTH and basic logic - there is your start and my end...

The last line you quoted was a list of perceived responses declared and otherwise... and my feeling on such... END of story... Is that not clear? Is what I write understandable?

"whipping the general populace up to a paranoid war fever is so easy any two-bit politician can do it." - - in part I understand that is so to some extent... What happens in USA always seems to amaze me....

 

Where is your "logical explanation" masalai?

You and boston say the fires were not the cause. "fire was also seen on floors 6–10, 13–14, 19–22, and 29–30. In particular, the fires on floors 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 continued to burn out of control during the afternoon. At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse" you and boston say were "small fires."

The structural model explanation posted you and boston say was not right because ???

Then you say "a thermite charge" and Boston posts a video showing a dozen flashes in or of window glazings, I'm not sure.

How do you and Boston claim these charges were placed in an occupied building with no one noticing? How many charges would it take? How much time would be required in the occupied building to set up your "logical explanation" beforehand?

Debris damage seems to have been ruled some but minor.
The fuel on site could have contributed but the report rules it not a big contributor.
That leaves:
fire damage
poor structural design
or both

You and boston propose thermite charge controlled demolition - I don't see how that is "logical" as how could it have been accomplished in an occupied building with no one noticing or leaking after 10 years??? To quote you, it "DOES NOT HAVE THE RING OF TRUTH and basic logic"

 

I did not write that as I do not have access to that sort of data and could not give a s41t...

Do you read english and understand what you read or are you some degenerate bored troll?, To repeat in different words, I was suggesting that some engineers and NY firemen reputedly said that a quantity of thermite could have been taken down to the basement (some 70 ft down) and effectively knocked out the central pillars which is the only logical way the building7 could have collapsed vertically and cleanly in on itself... Of other stuff I know not as I was not there nor do I have intimate access to what I would call authenticated data on the engineering and design constraints apart from what people who should know have declared - like the presentation by/to the firemen in NY?.....

All the other stuff has been answered READ THE POSTS... I cannot be bothered with your tiresome and inane repetitive questions that have already been covered - READ carefully and please refrain from being such a boor........

 

Did you read your own post one page back masalai ?

You wrote

It's hard to have a discussion with you if you write things and then say you didn't write them masalai.

I don't know how to respond to bile like this. I hope you are ok.

 

I looked and looked. Sensory overload! They're are SO MANY youtubes about this. Couldn't find one I could identify as the one you referenced. Calmate por favor

 

I linked to that site for fun and asked you to try it for fun.

It must be calculating the 1% globally.

I won't comment on your bile masalai.

It is noteworthy (good I think) that your Australian average wage is double the American average salary of $41,673.83 reported by http://www.ssa.gov/oact/COLA/AWI.html

 

Cut the mealymouthed bs. If you're claiming those were controlled demolitions, there must have been someone controlling them. Who would that someone have been, and what did they hope to gain?

Without a rational answer to those questions, everything else is just pointless hysteria.

 

I agree Troy,
In any investigation following list of questions need answers.
What happened and When? For how long? How did it happen or how was it managed. Who had opportunity and motive to do it? If a coverup? Who had power and motive to coverup. Who benefitted from the crime and who benefitted from the coverup.
If you have compelling answers to all these, then you have "suspects".
You still have to "prove" they did it with eye witnesses and forensic evidence. Only Sherlock could solve crimes by deduction alone. Deduction, or speculation, aren't admissable evidence.

 

Homeland security and the patriot act
billions went to companies invented over night and a whole lot of control back to central government

They sent soldiers to war in iraq certainly to die ( how bigs that number now)
with a made up story by that loony Blair in the UK

Why did they declare war...
What did it accomplish?

The Military intelligence (joke)was designed for US foreign policy I'm sure its full of Colonel Flaggs ( Mash)

ok lets bomb it and then...then..then....ok **** dubbya didnt you have a plan?

PS 9/11 whats the flight data recorder story??

 

Go soak your head, Boston. Water is a great fire retardant and you are on fire.

 

Not to mention retardant.

 

I'm still waiting for the next building demolition guys to just go and light a fire in the middle floors and watch it come down perfectly........

 

Ay Caramba! No hay en el mundo basta tiempo para descubrir cada articulo de este abominación.

I don't have the time for this nonsense. There is so much better nonsense for me to waste time on.


Me voy de aquí.

 

Buildings are designed to be demolished as they are built. When constructed in such tight areas. They are designed to collapse inside them self s for obvious reasons.

There was no fire at the bottom it was a dozen or so floors down, when that collapsed the whole building fell as it is designed to do.

To suggest that the Government wired and exploded this is moronic and OH did you notice 2 aircraft flown into them.

Why would they do this, why not just apply for a demolition certificate and building evacuation in the normal way.

 

Make up your mind. The people you're sneering at for being ignorant, incompetent asses are the same ones you believe somehow managed to prep and wire highrises for controlled demolitions, without thousands of people in them every day even noticing, then fly passenger jets into them and shove the blame off onto Al Queda?

Talk about schizophrenic thinking. I think you need help... and so do you.