Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Construction > Boatbuilding > Wooden Boat Building and Restoration
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-02-2007, 09:16 PM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
Patience s/o Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 94 Posts: 421
Location: Port Dickson, Malaysia
Ballast- concrete beam

Hello,
My boat need a big ballast, the original plan is to have one lead beam of about 20 tonne assemble in the form of long keel.I'm looking into alternative, my option is to have a concrete beam constructed in the form of long keel instead of lead. Do any of you know about this technique(concrete), the pro and cons of it ?
Photos at my photo gallery have some description.
Attached Thumbnails
Ballast- concrete beam-march05.jpg  Ballast- concrete beam-march051.jpg  Ballast- concrete beam-oct04016.jpg  

Ballast- concrete beam-oct04026.jpg  Ballast- concrete beam-oct04029.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2007, 09:27 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Yacht Designer & Builder
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 2891 Posts: 8,798
Location: Eustis, FL
Lead is much more dense then concrete. Even if the concrete has lots of iron and steel in it, you'll be lucky to have 200 to 220 pounds per cubic foot, where lead will be in the 650 to 700 pounds per cubic foot range.

This doesn't mean you can't use concrete, you can and many boats have a concrete ballast, but you'll need a much bigger ballast casting. Also the center of gravity will be considerably higher on a boat with a concrete ballast, that was designed for lead. This can cause some concerns in certain designs. Contact the designer and talk over the change with them. If the designer isn't available then you'll need to have a different designer look over your plans and ballast suggestions, to insure she'll have a reasonable level of safety and stability. As a rule this isn't an element of the design an amateur should be fooling with, seek a pro's help on this one.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-02-2007, 10:24 PM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
Patience s/o Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 94 Posts: 421
Location: Port Dickson, Malaysia
Thank you Par, actually I'm at the stage where a lot of changes still can take place without endangering anything. I'll be seeing the builder/designer in April. Now is still monsoon season and raging floods every where. The cost of lead had shoot up, can't even park a lorry un attended, the battery will be gone..!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:33 AM
Milan Milan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 244 Posts: 319
Location: The Netherlands
If you can't afford lead, you should at least mix a lot of steel in concrete, as concrete by it self is to light.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2007, 05:09 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Yacht Designer & Builder
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 2891 Posts: 8,798
Location: Eustis, FL
If you replace the aggregate with steel or iron and use steel or iron as the reinforcement, you'll still only have 200 - 220 pounds per cubic foot of ballast. This means the concrete ballast casting will need to be huge in comparison to a lead version. For example if your lead ballast casting was 14 tall, the same weight of heavily steel/iron reinforced concrete will be over 5 feet tall. This assumes the length and width are the same (which would be typical of a ballast casting)

I'm reasonably sure your designer is going to have problems with this change, though you may have the latitude in the design.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2007, 09:46 PM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
Patience s/o Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 94 Posts: 421
Location: Port Dickson, Malaysia
Par, the different in size is hugh..!The ballast in the photo attached in earlier post is about 14 inches H x 12 inches W x 45 feet L. about 14 tonne.The owner told me it is about 12 tonne ++.Thank you for the comparison. Maybe I should seriously looks into recycle lead acid battery industry.Maybe there will be ways to recycle some for my purpose.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2007, 04:06 PM
riggertroy riggertroy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep: 85 Posts: 104
Location: New Zealand
Hi Ari, I know of one sailing ship (wooden) that has had an RSJ(ridgid steel girder) fitted as an addition onto the original keel, the girder was filled with cement to add more weight.
There were 2 main reasons for doing this, the first was to reduce the hog (ship had been a cargo ship in her early years and is now only carrying passengers) and to lower the centre of gravity by shifting some of the internal ballast lower, it worked on both counts and also reportedly improved the sailing abilities, less leeway. The one big disadvantage was that it increased the draft by the height of the RSJ.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2007, 09:14 PM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
Patience s/o Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 94 Posts: 421
Location: Port Dickson, Malaysia
Rigid steel girder ballast

Hello Riggertroy,
This RSG equip wooden sail cargo boat is one very interesting avenue that can be explored further. Those cargo boats in Indonesia did not have permanent ballast. When empty they will sit real high above the water, they can only sail real good when fully loaded, I meant to the brim. Some photo at my members gallery will testify that. I'm very keen to buy some used cargo boat and convert it to a yacht for this purpose, still looking for the pro and cons because I don't want the ballast to be the most expensive parts of that boat.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2007, 09:36 PM
riggertroy riggertroy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep: 85 Posts: 104
Location: New Zealand
Hi Ari,
The ship I mentioned did not originally carry much if any permanent ballast but as she no longer carries cargo the owners decided to fit permanant ballast. She was originally built as a motor sailing cargo ship, schooner rig I think, now she is rigged as a brigantine and sails are her main motive power now, same main engine as when she was built.
The RSJ helped to strengthen her, she apparently was hogging badly and now even with the RSJ she still has a small amount of hog, a couple of inches. Waterline length is about 95 feet approx.
Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-11-2007, 04:47 PM
BOATMIK's Avatar
BOATMIK BOATMIK is offline
Deeply flawed human being
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 190 Posts: 273
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ari View Post
I'm at the stage where a lot of changes still can take place without endangering anything.
Howdy Ari,

From the pics you already have the keel cutout for the lead done - I don't think you are very free to change.

As a correction to some of the figures above.

Lead's specific gravity is 11.4 - not the lower figure quoted above
Concrete is 2.5.

So you need 4 times the volume of concrete.

If you like sailing I wouldn't change the ballast material - it is a tiny fraction of the overall cost.

Best wishes
Michael Storer
__________________
my boat pages
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-12-2007, 12:54 AM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
Patience s/o Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 94 Posts: 421
Location: Port Dickson, Malaysia
Hello Michael/boatmix,
Those pictures are not from my boat, they are from another boat constructed in Malaysia. I put it there to ensure the others understand what do I meant/my question. I had stayed with lead ballast after understanding the differences between the two material. Thank you for your comments Michael.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-19-2007, 09:56 AM
CapKos CapKos is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 15 Posts: 47
Location: Geneva
Hi Ari,

You can also check the printing industry. Several years ago they used lead letters, but now everything is electronic. Could still have some lead. Casting 20t of lead is not a simple work, especially when considering that the lead is dangerous poison. What I can’t understand on the pictures is that the lead apparently is put in iron form, which should be bad for the electrolysis. Note that with lead you should use bronze bolts for the same reason.

Good luck,
CapKos
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-20-2007, 08:37 PM
Ari's Avatar
Ari Ari is offline
Patience s/o Genius
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 94 Posts: 421
Location: Port Dickson, Malaysia
Long keel lead casting

Hi Ari,

What I can’t understand on the pictures is that the lead apparently is put in iron form, which should be bad for the electrolysis. Note that with lead you should use bronze bolts for the same reason.

Good luck,
CapKos[/quote]

Thank you for your suggestion on the printing company.The steel container is actually the die/casing for lead casting. It will be remove after lead had harden up.Silicon Bronze screws,stud and bolts were used on this boat.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Concrete Canoe! (Help) Luciano Boat Design 13 06-13-2009 05:44 PM
Barge Out of Concrete? Hotel Lima Boat Design 21 12-12-2006 03:27 PM
Is there a problem with concrete as ballast in steel sailboat? hiracer Metal Boat Building 6 07-24-2006 10:01 PM
Water Ballast & Keel Ballast jag459 Sailboats 4 09-08-2005 02:39 PM
Water Ballast vs Keel Ballast jag459 Boat Design 13 09-08-2005 08:01 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net