Prop angle on a hydroplane

Discussion in 'Surface Drives' started by matejo, Jun 8, 2011.

  1. matejo
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 38
    Location: Slovenia

    matejo New Member

    Hi.
    I am new to this forum :D

    I am designing rc model boats (speed hydroplanes).
    I allready build two of them. The third one is the largest soo far:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    The plan is to scale up my models to the real 1:1 boat.

    On the topic...
    Before I build my own boat is gona take me a awhile.
    But I like to discus the project before it hits the drawing board.

    I am planing to use a Subaru 2.0Turbo gas engine (or something with 250HP) in a homebuild hydroplane.
    The question is:
    How to find a right angle for the propeller?
    The model boats have Flexshafts that are adjustable with hight and angle:
    [​IMG]

    On the model the angle is between 0 and 4 degrees.
    But on the real hydroplane it seams to be much larger angle:
    [​IMG]

    Is any possiblitity to have a ajdustable angle or not?
    The problem is if (in the future) I want tho change the angle I must reposition the whole motor and the strut :rolleyes:

    Thaks for brain storming with me.

    Matej from Slovenia
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. Tim B
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 1,438
    Likes: 59, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 841
    Location: Southern England

    Tim B Senior Member

    The big problem you will find in moving from RC boats to full scale is the power to weight ratio. I recently built a fast electric monohull along what I thought were reasonable hull-lines. The big problem we had was that over about 75% throttle (6-cells, fully charged) the boat was flipping over (in roll), due to the prop torque. This was not a failing of the hull, as much as the submerged drive lifting the entire hull out of the water, so there was nothing to react the torque.

    Deeper V boats with surface drives were not quite as quick (when we were upright), so the next challenge is to react the torque without significantly adding to the weight or resistance.

    Pics are here: http://openpilot.engineering.selfip.org/gallery.php?dir=RST_Racing
    Length is 590mm, with 6 NIMH cells and Speed 600. Weight was about 930grams and construction was 3mm ply bulkheads and major longitudinals, 1.5mm spruce elsewhere and 0.4mm ply skin.

    In the full-scale boat, you will not have quite as much power, and therefore you might want the shaft angled to help lift the boat (or at least the stern) out of the water.

    How big are your models? The one you're holding looks about 900mm. I think you could remove some structure to reduce the weight. Lightening holes in the bulkheads, and perhaps reduce the amount of ply in the longitudinals. Low weight is everything in model boats, even if it sometimes causes other problems!

    Good luck,

    Tim B.
     
  3. matejo
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 38
    Location: Slovenia

    matejo New Member

    NiMh cells and speed motors are history!
    Now if you dont run brushless you arent " for real".
    My second one on 3S Lipo and 4800Kv:
    [​IMG]

    I was experimenting with prop/shaft angle on it.
    I increased the angle and the front of the boat started to dive in the wather!
    And the speed was reduced immediatley when the boat gain some speed :rolleyes:

    *The one that I am holding on is 650mm long. It is going to run on a nitro 3,5ccm engine. I forgot the holes for weight reduction, yes.
    But as you sad: power to weight ration is important.
    I dont want to be the fastest out there. I just want to train my design and building for the BIG one:D
     
  4. Tim B
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 1,438
    Likes: 59, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 841
    Location: Southern England

    Tim B Senior Member

    Unfortunately I was limited by the rules, as to what the power source was. I'm not sure I would have wanted to put any more power in it anyway, even with a surface drive. At least, not at that weight and size. However, the next boat will be faster. What sort of structural weight are you looking at? We were about 380g for the bare hull.

    With a submerged drive you do get a significant bow down pitching moment, but this can be countered by moving weight aft. Note in the full-size pics that the engine and driver are as far aft as possible, the CG with driver in the seat will be around the back of the engine. This will split the loading about 2/3 forward, 1/3 aft. The exact location of the CG can only really be determined through trial and error.

    Cheers,

    Tim B.
     
  5. matejo
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 38
    Location: Slovenia

    matejo New Member

    The plan is to have motor behind the driver.
    Something like this:
    [​IMG]
     
  6. baeckmo
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 1,666
    Likes: 675, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 1165
    Location: Sweden

    baeckmo Hydrodynamics

    A submerged propeller operating close to an open surface will experience a vertical force component, even with zero shaft angle. This force is strong enough to cause "prop riding", ie the propeller is balancing in surface piercing mode at ~50% submergence.

    As soon as air is entering the propeller disc area (the prop "ventilates"), the blades operate with an air "pocket" on their suction side, which completely changes the flow and thus the forces generated. Surface piercing propellers have been tested up to about 20 degrees shaft angle (~50 % submerged) with very good results. Normally, the blades are raked so that they are vertical in the "wet" operating zone. Most SP props operate in the 8 to 10 degree range.

    So, in your case, design the setup with the prop hub at wl level with the dynamic lifting surfaces of the hull in correct operating trim and heave position, then the final adjustment of propeller lift is done via blade rake in combination with cg adjustments.
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. matejo
    Joined: Jun 2011
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 38
    Location: Slovenia

    matejo New Member

    Great informations from you!
    Thanks again:):):):):)

    I saw some reading material based on propulsion here on this forum...
    A plan for some other time.

    Where did you get your knowlege on this kind of things?
     
  8. Tim B
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 1,438
    Likes: 59, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 841
    Location: Southern England

    Tim B Senior Member

    I am a qualified Naval Architect. I mostly do software now though, and I love investigating new ideas.

    Tim B.
     
  9. stupidbaker57
    Joined: Jan 2011
    Posts: 67
    Likes: 4, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 40
    Location: Lakeville Ma

    stupidbaker57 Junior Member

    Here's another DIY inboard drive that I'm building. Power is a honda motorcycle engine just forward of the motorboard. The boat is a 3 point hydro. DSCF0008.JPG

    DSCF0006.JPG
     
  10. stupidbaker57
    Joined: Jan 2011
    Posts: 67
    Likes: 4, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 40
    Location: Lakeville Ma

    stupidbaker57 Junior Member

    Here's another picture of the drive with paint and an engine. DSCF0001.JPG
     
  11. masalai
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 6,818
    Likes: 121, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1882
    Location: cruising, Australia

    masalai masalai


  12. tunnels

    tunnels Previous Member

    The front of a hydro needs to fly on a cushion of air while the rear end is supported by the forces of the propeller and the lift it produces so in reality theres hardly any part of the boat bearly touching the water ,so shaft angle as shallow to no angle at all !!. should ride with half the prop and the lower part of the rudder in the water , then you have the perfect ride . MAYBE !!;)
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. sandhammaren05
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,435
  2. sandhammaren05
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    2,247
  3. Tracie Kaneshiro
    Replies:
    9
    Views:
    5,449
  4. Christian Lucas
    Replies:
    11
    Views:
    2,920
  5. sandhammaren05
    Replies:
    11
    Views:
    2,301
  6. Sassriverrat
    Replies:
    35
    Views:
    4,712
  7. OCB
    Replies:
    76
    Views:
    18,257
  8. tom kane
    Replies:
    99
    Views:
    30,061
  9. sandhammaren05
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    3,528
  10. sandhammaren05
    Replies:
    25
    Views:
    8,765
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.