Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > Sterndrives
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2009, 01:49 PM
Red Tide Red Tide is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 68 Posts: 58
Location: MA
Alpha vs. Bravo drag and HP loss?

If you have two 23' identical boats with 300 hp V8 engine 55-65 mph speed range, one with an Alpha Gen II outdrive and one with a Bravo 1 outdrive, which will go faster? I've been told that the Bravo will hold up better over time, but that the alpha has less drag and will be ~2 mph faster? True?

Any first hand experiences with a side-by-side comparisons?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2009, 02:15 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 1993 Posts: 4,132
Location: Ontario
In theory, the Alpha could be very slightly faster than a standard Bravo 1, by virtue of its smaller, lower-drag gearcase. Depends on the prop and gear ratio as well, of course.

In practice, 300 hp at 65 mph is right at the limit of what an Alpha can handle. It'll still have a warranty at this rating, but it probably won't hold up as well as a beefier drive like a Bravo or any of the Volvos.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2009, 07:12 PM
Red Tide Red Tide is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 68 Posts: 58
Location: MA
Is there a good head-to-head comparison of a bravo 1 vs. volvo sx drive somewhere?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2009, 09:38 PM
Hundredcaliber Hundredcaliber is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 5
Location: USA
What about the Alpha one, how will it hold up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2009, 03:38 AM
Red Tide Red Tide is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 68 Posts: 58
Location: MA
Quote:
What about the Alpha one, how will it hold up.
I believe Matt - not as well as a Bravo - some talk of changing the oil in their alpha drives every 15 hours as it only holds a quart and a half. But you can have three alphas for the cost of a bravo, or more uppers if that's what lets go, and still come out ahead if money is tight or use is low.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2009, 03:39 AM
Red Tide Red Tide is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 68 Posts: 58
Location: MA
Sorry Hundred, I think you meant how does the Alpha Gen I compare to the Alpha Gen II in strength/durability/problems. Good question. I don't know the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2009, 08:21 PM
Hundredcaliber Hundredcaliber is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 5
Location: USA
That's exactly what I meant. I'm in the building stage of putting together a Ford 351 to a Alpha I drive. The price on the SEI 106 looks appealing to me. I would like to hear if the service going to be there with the Alpha I?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2009, 10:08 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 1993 Posts: 4,132
Location: Ontario
I don't know how the first- and second-generation Alphas compare, reliability-wise.

You say you're using a Ford 351 (Windsor?) for this? 300ish horses and 350-400 ft.lb is an awful lot to ram through an Alpha, whatever generation you choose. It's a low end, mass market drive intended for something with a 200 hp V6 that lives on a trailer and goes out for six hours each weekend. If you're going to push your drive hard, perhaps a Volvo or one of the Merc Bravos would be a better choice. There are also many surface drive options that, while rare, can work very well and are cheaper/simpler.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2009, 11:15 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 621 Posts: 1,743
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
Merc sold 351W as a 233 with a twin barrel carb.
With a 4 barrel it was a 255 but that was only packaged on a II drive.
as a marine engine it would be lucky to have much over 300ftlbs if that.
If your building your own spec engine then ??
The weight of the boat is the key to the drive lasting
If it will do 40mph it wont live that long
If it will be doing 60 it will live.
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2009, 07:51 PM
Hundredcaliber Hundredcaliber is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 5
Location: USA
Greetings to all... The boat had a OMC with a Chevy 283 when I got it. From what I'm hearing is that you cant get the Bravos or the newer drives to hook up to the older style engines. I was told the Alpha1 was the only option.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-06-2009, 12:29 PM
CDK's Avatar
CDK CDK is offline
retired engineer
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Rep: 1653 Posts: 2,673
Location: Adriatic sea
The Alpha-1 1th generation cannot cope with 300 (Merc) HP. In my drive the vertical shaft snapped in the first week. I must admit that the drive was already used approx 50 hours with a 250HP engine.
As far as I know the difference between 1th and 2nd gen. is minimal. Some extra holes for lube monitor and speed pickup, simple bolts and nuts to fasten the lower housing instead of recessed bolts and better looking trim cylinders.
And of course different way to attach the upper bellows. I think it's just cheaper to manufacture, not better.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2009, 01:21 PM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 621 Posts: 1,743
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
CDK
Yep, the big jump in strength was from the old 1 drive to the Alpha.
The old box had the gears cut such that they pulled together like an old outboard and also had the preload button on the driveshaft.
The alpha cut the gears the other way and had hence have the tapered roller the other way on the driveshaft and no need for the button on top. ( like OMC)
Removing the button also strenghtend the drive shaft as the hole went down past the oring groove, without the hole that shaft was stronger in the oring groove area which was one weak link.
The drive shaft was alot beefier in the area in the lower unit as the tapered roller is now installed from the top allowing the shaft to be larger better supporting the drive shaft pinion bearing
They also started using near net forged gears which are much stronger
I installed the very first Alpha in Australia as a spare part to a 260 MCM that broke under w/tee as the drive unit was installed in a boat too heavy for it ( all engine problms are caused by boat builders)
Dont forget Merc also sold 330HP ( 454 chev) Alpha....it worked on light boats???
I supplied a drive to a ski racing boat with about 500hp small block and used the short shaft alpha 1 SS drive. Never broke one but it had helicopter style maintanence...
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windsurf sail lift/drag vs Alpha windsomniac Sailboats 9 07-01-2009 07:00 PM
Alpha to Bravo upgrade Stackthepilot Sterndrives 0 04-25-2009 10:47 PM
Loss of power slow poke Powerboats 6 06-15-2007 12:23 PM
loss of power gnr6209 Powerboats 4 07-29-2005 01:38 PM
Vacuum loss duluthboats Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 1 06-23-2003 03:41 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2013 Boat Design Net