Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Stability
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-22-2011, 05:37 AM
santoo's Avatar
santoo santoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 34
Location: Indonesia
Aha!!

Thanks Perm Stress,
"How far up did you made your superstructures weathertight?", All window and door are weathertight. But, there are some hole for blower device.

My boss will never change the shape and dimension of superstructure.

You know a ship like passengers ferry which have so high of superstructure, but she can sail with legal...

How about ratio of weather lateral area with displacement?

Thanks...
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-22-2011, 06:22 AM
Perm Stress's Avatar
Perm Stress Perm Stress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 323 Posts: 523
Location: Lithuania
The question really was more like "how many tiers of superstructure are made weathertight?". In principle, (wild generalization tough) if all the superstructure is sealed, and CG is only reasonably (not wildly) low, the ship could be made uncapsizeable, like those all-weather lifeboats that RNLI employ around Britain.
Is it possible to relocate that blower hole one or two decks higher?
I am not sure if lateral wind area to displacement ratio is of much significance in itself... there are many other variables involved.
__________________
All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-27-2011, 07:42 PM
santoo's Avatar
santoo santoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 34
Location: Indonesia
Ok OK Ok...
thanks perm...

I already try to including superstructure to maxsurf model, for hydromax (analysis).
and that's look more stable...
But still so critical,
is that cause of VCG value which so high?
i have try to recalculate the position of G point, but still become so high...

Thanks perm, u open my eyes...

Do you have any email address?
Hope we can be best friend, You are from Lithuania, and i am from Indonesia.

isn't that useful knowledge is knowledge that is transmitted?
hihihi...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-27-2011, 11:45 PM
Perm Stress's Avatar
Perm Stress Perm Stress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 323 Posts: 523
Location: Lithuania
What is the source of weight and Center of gravity information?
Nothing will beat detailed weight calculation here. I do not mean counting every bracket. I mean counting average weight of every bottom, side, deck, deckhouse side with stiffeners. Then web framing and bulkheads. Then all the foundations for engines, generators, mooring winches... . Then add some 10% for all the forgotten stuff.
Then interior fit-out (just ask a interior supplier company for average weight of all the fit-out for m2 of cabins). And so on with all the major weights.
Provided nothing mayor is forgotten, weight and CG will be more or less accurate. As a rule, weight and CG estimations tend to be optimistic (too light weight and too low CG).
But it is much better than guessing and significantly better than statistics from other vessels.
With multi-deck superstructures of big ships it is customary to make top few (or most) layers from aluminium. Even if steel is used, the higher up the superstructure, progressively thinner plating and lighter framing is used.
Hope this will help.
__________________
All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-28-2011, 11:38 PM
santoo's Avatar
santoo santoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 34
Location: Indonesia
Noted perm... Noted....
Thanks for your reply....
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-01-2011, 02:02 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
Santoo, I belive You are making mistake by assessing HSC using IMO intact stability code. For HSC there is input of windspeed; play with that and get weather criterion comply; then limit operational windspeed.

Pls look at HSC Code, they have their own intact stabiliy assessment methods, including wind gust, roll, high speed turn and passenger crowding. Also pls try to read the code before using software.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-01-2011, 09:36 AM
santoo's Avatar
santoo santoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 34
Location: Indonesia
thanks for your reply Alik,

i already read the code first before running my software. I use BV HSC code.
And i was used his rules..

Maybe u can give me any reference please, because i afraid i make a mistake.

Thanks for your respoun..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-01-2011, 09:45 AM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
In HSC annex for stability assessment there is a formula for wind pressure, it depends on wind speed. Reduce windspeed and get compliance for weather criterion. Then, limit operational conditions to obtained windspeed.

Another option - You can work with roll angle; try to reduce it.

I doubt if You can do too much to increase GM of boat if yard is not willing to change the structure. I also doubt that making deckhouse watertight will help as it will cause much heavier structures, closings, etc.; it will definitely reduce initial stability.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-01-2011, 09:05 PM
santoo's Avatar
santoo santoo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 34
Location: Indonesia
ya ya ya ya,,,,
I'll try this one first,,,,

So my vessel has a specific operational area,,,,
hm hm hm,,,,

Ok Ok, i'll try,,,,

Thanks Alik...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-02-2011, 10:41 AM
Perm Stress's Avatar
Perm Stress Perm Stress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 323 Posts: 523
Location: Lithuania
With all the attention to details and high-end stuff, the elephant passed by unnoticed.
Operation area restriction normally mean less stringent criteria for stability, weather criterion, and so on...
__________________
All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-02-2011, 09:43 PM
Alik's Avatar
Alik Alik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Rep: 1070 Posts: 2,036
Location: Thailand
I believe if operational windspeed is reduced from, say 25m/s to 20m/s it will still be OK. Need to reduce class of vessel, but it is not really important for HSC which are only designed to make passages up to 4 hours long, according to HSC Code.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-23-2011, 03:56 AM
ekamarine ekamarine is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rep: 36 Posts: 43
Location: Turkey
I assume that you know where this boat will work. If you have no chance to change design, it's easier to modify the criteria a little bit. You can try to reduce wind pressure which will let design succeed the criteria.
Of course achieving all with changes on design is the way to make a good hull but if you are sure that the boat will not run in extreme weather conditions, no need to satisfy the criteria for Beaufort 10.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weather reports Manie B Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 2 07-01-2010 02:51 PM
Weather terminology? Manie B Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 11 04-06-2009 03:55 PM
Delftship, IMO weather criterion klaas Software 0 03-19-2009 11:30 AM
Weather helm stuart_paget Sailboats 15 09-25-2007 09:13 PM
How would she ride in weather? witzgall Boat Design 13 03-01-2007 11:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net