Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Stability
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-12-2011, 07:22 PM
bntii's Avatar
bntii bntii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Rep: 1073 Posts: 704
Location: MD
The stability of a vessel as shown by measurement defines the response the hull will exhibit through the range of fit outs and loadings which it may be subjected to over its service life.

It appears to be a required starting place.
I trust the designers here will elaborate?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Hickson View Post
I saw a very similar stability curve for a Contessa 32, a very similar deadrise, and hull shape. I suspect most boats of that era have a very similar stability curve.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Hickson View Post
There is a huge difference in what any two owners will put aboard a boat, something that no designer can predict, which makes micro calculations,and measurements , meaningless, in the real world.

Is not the stability curve for the Contessa 32 a product of "micro calculations" and "measurements"?
So do you agree with their utility or not?

And further, how does one know that the BS_36 exhibits a "similar stability curve" as the Contessa 32 without subjecting it to calculations and measurements?
  #32  
Old 03-12-2011, 09:47 PM
Tad's Avatar
Tad Tad is offline
Yacht Designer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rep: 2042 Posts: 1,719
Location: Gabriola Island, B.C. Canada
taz......

Thanks for that, those dimensions published in the book are some of the source material I'm using.......

bn,

The Contessa 32 curve referred to is published in Tony Marchaj's book, Seaworthiness, The forgotten Factor. That data is presented with VCG at -.75' (9" below dwl). I have no idea how realistic that is, but it's suspect.......perhaps possible for a stripped racing boat but unlikely with 6-8 big guys on the deck.......The Swain 36 will be considerably different due to loading and construction..........
  #33  
Old 03-13-2011, 12:38 AM
TeddyDiver's Avatar
TeddyDiver TeddyDiver is offline
Gollywobbler
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Rep: 1348 Posts: 2,057
Location: Finland/Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Hickson View Post
similar stability curve;very similar deadrise;a very similar stability curve;huge distance from a plank on edge; the huge effect of the buoyancy in a pilot house;a huge difference in what any two owners will put aboard a boat
A steel scuba tank, empty, with far thicker wall will float .
You never learn Brent Words like "similar" and "huge" are used instead of a single fact in your claims..
and steel scuba tanks don't float. 15L 200bar tank is the only standard steel tank with ~1kg of positive boyancy (with regulators attached it's neutral) when other more common 12 and 10 liter tanks are all well negatively boyant.
  #34  
Old 03-13-2011, 12:52 AM
Wynand N's Avatar
Wynand N Wynand N is offline
Retired Steelboatbuilder
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rep: 1625 Posts: 1,170
Location: South Africa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Hickson View Post
A steel scuba tank, empty, with far thicker wall will float .
One liter of flotation/buoyancy will float one kg minus the weigh of flotation medium used in freshwater, fact. In saltwater the difference is minuscule and not really a factor.
Secondly, due to the density of water the specific gravity of submerged steel is about 0.88, in other words, one kg steel will weigh 880 grams submerged.

Now make the sum and see if the scuba tank will float....
__________________
Wynand
A scatterling of Africa
Follow my latest project here: http://www.lotus7.co.nz/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=1530
My Webpage: Steel Boatbuilding: http://5psi.net
  #35  
Old 03-13-2011, 01:05 AM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynand N View Post
One liter of flotation/buoyancy will float one kg minus the weigh of flotation medium used in freshwater, fact. In saltwater the difference is minuscule and not really a factor.
Secondly, due to the density of water the specific gravity of submerged steel is about 0.88, in other words, one kg steel will weigh 880 grams submerged.

Now make the sum and see if the scuba tank will float....
SMILE
often I had to dive for the tank I let go
  #36  
Old 03-13-2011, 04:32 PM
peter radclyffe's Avatar
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 576 Posts: 1,066
Location: europe
quote

hear Dudly Dix is now giving different stability curves for boats with pilot houses and those without, taking into account the huge effect of the buoyancy in a pilot house on stability


this is unwise, as pilot houses are rarely watertight,
  #37  
Old 03-13-2011, 04:56 PM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter radclyffe View Post
quote

hear Dudly Dix is now giving different stability curves for boats with pilot houses and those without, taking into account the huge effect of the buoyancy in a pilot house on stability


this is unwise, as pilot houses are rarely watertight,
that depends, many metal boats are ar wt as can be esp those build under Lloyds
I did one once and they turned a hose on it to test the integrity of the house egress,s
And this should be a test for all yachts going , not only Offshore but out of the river?
  #38  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:00 PM
Paul Kotzebue's Avatar
Paul Kotzebue Paul Kotzebue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Rep: 272 Posts: 244
Location: Encinitas, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter radclyffe View Post
quote

hear Dudly Dix is now giving different stability curves for boats with pilot houses and those without, taking into account the huge effect of the buoyancy in a pilot house on stability


this is unwise, as pilot houses are rarely watertight,
This a good observation that some may not be considering. The only time the volume of a pilot house should be used in stability calculations is if the structure of the pilot house is designed to withstand the loads of being immersed and downflooding can be prevented.

While the volume of a structurally sound and watertight pilot house will help right a capsized vessel, its weight and windage may make it more prone to capsize in the first place.
__________________
Paul R. Kotzebue, PE
www.pkboatplans.com
  #39  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:16 PM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Kotzebue View Post
This a good observation that some may not be considering. The only time the volume of a pilot house should be used in stability calculations is if the structure of the pilot house is designed to withstand the loads of being immersed and downflooding can be prevented.

While the volume of a structurally sound and watertight pilot house will help right a capsized vessel, its weight and windage may make it more prone to capsize in the first place.
it depends upon what you call a pilothouse, or decksaloon
the (house) if you may call it that on an open 60 for instance is a very important part of the test(righting roll over)
Once again we assume that the structure is in keeping with standards
And if we then go on to extremes , albeit very common ones, the stabilty of say a 20,ooo tonne ferry is calculated with those windows high above the water as being submerged and part of the heeled waterplane
  #40  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:19 PM
peter radclyffe's Avatar
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 576 Posts: 1,066
Location: europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Smith View Post
that depends, many metal boats are ar wt as can be esp those build under Lloyds
I did one once and they turned a hose on it to test the integrity of the house egress,s
And this should be a test for all yachts going , not only Offshore but out of the river?
the wracking strains on a boat at sea with big windows, even if they are bench tested watertight, prove a hose test is just that, a hose test
  #41  
Old 03-13-2011, 05:31 PM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter radclyffe View Post
the wracking strains on a boat at sea with big windows, even if they are bench tested watertight, prove a hose test is just that, a hose test
perhaps you are used to timber, which wracks
small metal structures do not wrack, unlike ships. they are quite the module
Having been to sea in full gales for days on nose, I assure you it was more than a hose test
  #42  
Old 03-13-2011, 07:29 PM
Tad's Avatar
Tad Tad is offline
Yacht Designer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rep: 2042 Posts: 1,719
Location: Gabriola Island, B.C. Canada
This is the model so far....bit of a struggle.....I had little faith in it as I built it, but upon expanding the surfaces I find it fits the "half pattern" (the only dimensioned drawing I have) rather well..........surprise........

Now for the deck, house, and cockpit.......

Swain BS_36  Stability curve-swain36model01.jpg
  #43  
Old 03-13-2011, 08:39 PM
Ad Hoc Ad Hoc is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Rep: 1933 Posts: 3,025
Location: Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Smith View Post
And if we then go on to extremes , albeit very common ones, the stabilty of say a 20,ooo tonne ferry is calculated with those windows high above the water as being submerged and part of the heeled waterplane
Not correct.

Windows and any other openings where progressive flooding may take place, is called downflooding. All these locations must have a freeboard and/or an angle from the damaged condition to the angle of downflood (or freeboard) in excess of that given by the administration.

Windows etc are not considered part of a stability calculation. Only the hull below the margin line. In other words, the superstructure is non-contributary. It may assist, but it is not considered as being "effective" by the administration. You just need to ensure progress flooding does not occur.
  #44  
Old 03-13-2011, 11:56 PM
peter radclyffe's Avatar
peter radclyffe peter radclyffe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 576 Posts: 1,066
Location: europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Smith View Post
perhaps you are used to timber, which wracks
small metal structures do not wrack, unlike ships. they are quite the module
Having been to sea in full gales for days on nose, I assure you it was more than a hose test
i started working on steel boats 35 years ago, and windows on steel boats are often the weak point
  #45  
Old 03-14-2011, 12:47 AM
Dean Smith Dean Smith is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter radclyffe View Post
i started working on steel boats 35 years ago, and windows on steel boats are often the weak point, perhaps you are used to ignoring facts
the issue is wracking
yes a full sized ship had her fore facing windows stove by a 100 ft wave in the Sourthern Ocean, which knocked out her mains, she lay broadsize until they did start her mains
So how far would you care to go
btway I am 65, so please be slightly polite
Closed Thread



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
in the preliminary design, how to check and made a stability curve tessario_lukas Stability 1 04-13-2008 10:43 AM
very importan need tocalculate cross curve of stability KN s3dany Stability 5 01-08-2008 10:07 AM
Egret Sharpie {Munroe} stability curve Lassuuu Stability 10 08-24-2007 05:15 AM
Brent Swain Boatbuilerfx Boat Design 3 03-10-2007 08:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net