Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Stability
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2010, 05:19 PM
christoph christoph is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 2
Location: Houma Louisiana
How much weight can my pontoons hold at half emersion?

I have a calculation that I need answered by you guys.

I have 3 pontoons that are 33 feet long with a 24 inch diameter. How much weight will these pontoons hold at half emersion in fresh water? The pontoons are aluminium.

If some one could post the actual equation that would be awsome to! I have found no place on the net that has this equation.

Thanks for the help
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2010, 06:14 PM
sharpii2 sharpii2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 471 Posts: 954
Location: Michigan, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by christoph View Post
I have a calculation that I need answered by you guys.

I have 3 pontoons that are 33 feet long with a 24 inch diameter. How much weight will these pontoons hold at half emersion in fresh water? The pontoons are aluminium.

If some one could post the actual equation that would be awsome to! I have found no place on the net that has this equation.

Thanks for the help
What you are really asking for is the displacement at the half diameter.

I'll assume the pontoons are not just straight tubes with a flat bulkhead at the ends.

You need a separate calculation for the ends which is based on their shapes.

For the straight tube portion, the formula is:

(Diameter in ft squared)*0.785*Length*Number of pontoons*62.2 pounds/2

This will give you the displacement of just the straight sections at half diameter immersion. The weight of the pontoons must be subtracted from this to give you the weight they will actually support.
__________________
I am highly suspicious of the terms 'perfect' and 'best'. I favor the terms 'inadequate', 'adequate', and 'better', instead, with the first of these closest to being an absolute.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2010, 06:37 PM
christoph christoph is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 2
Location: Houma Louisiana
is this correct?

Thanks for the quick reply .I do have some questions though. I was looking on a web site called u-fab pontoons and according to there spread sheet it says that a pontoon of 24 inch diameter at 30 foot long will hold 5500 lbs . why is this so different than the calculation that you gave me?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2010, 08:18 PM
sharpii2 sharpii2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rep: 471 Posts: 954
Location: Michigan, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by christoph View Post
Thanks for the quick reply .I do have some questions though. I was looking on a web site called u-fab pontoons and according to there spread sheet it says that a pontoon of 24 inch diameter at 30 foot long will hold 5500 lbs . why is this so different than the calculation that you gave me?
It looks like they are either loading the pontoon down to almost all its diameter or they are assuming you are actually using two, as most pontoon boats do, and using the full volume of one to calculate the half volume of two.

3.14*30*62.4=5878

which is pretty close to what you got on their spread sheet. They may have allowed for the lesser displacement per foot of the ends.
__________________
I am highly suspicious of the terms 'perfect' and 'best'. I favor the terms 'inadequate', 'adequate', and 'better', instead, with the first of these closest to being an absolute.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-31-2010, 09:20 PM
Submarine Tom's Avatar
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 937 Posts: 1,941
Location: North America (not USA and not Mexico but, below the 49th parallel, and on the Pacific coast)
Each cubic foot equals 62.4 pounds of water.

You can figure out the rest.

-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2010, 12:38 AM
pistnbroke's Avatar
pistnbroke pistnbroke is offline
I try
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rep: 387 Posts: 1,269
Location: Noosa.Australia where god kissed the earth.
feet inches pounds ...god help america
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2010, 12:53 PM
Submarine Tom's Avatar
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 937 Posts: 1,941
Location: North America (not USA and not Mexico but, below the 49th parallel, and on the Pacific coast)
I get ~8500 pounds of buoyancy half submerged. That's assuming tapered or rounded ends and circular cross-section.

Your total vessel weight should not exceed ~6000 pounds as this is the total buoyancy available from one pontoon.

-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2010, 12:53 AM
Submarine Tom's Avatar
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 937 Posts: 1,941
Location: North America (not USA and not Mexico but, below the 49th parallel, and on the Pacific coast)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistnbroke View Post
feet inches pounds ...god help america
Did you mean "feet, inches, pounds..."?

I agree with you on the second part!

-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-17-2010, 10:07 AM
froudedude froudedude is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 9
Location: Annapolis
Really, unless we get grammar and punctuation correct, America is done for. Oh, did I end a sustenance with at preposition?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2010, 05:47 AM
JFdez JFdez is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: Spain
weights pontoon

Weight that the pontoon will support=Weight of the pontoon submerged volume at the desired draft- total weight of the pontoon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-26-2010, 05:54 AM
JFdez JFdez is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 4
Location: Spain
......-total weight of the pontoon (of course, without considering the added weight)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-03-2010, 11:03 AM
netjaws netjaws is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 22 Posts: 73
Location: None
cristoph, be careful with using 1/2 pontoon depth as your design draft. beyond the pontoons being 1/2 submerged, your TPI decreases exponentially with each slight weight addition, leading to a very precarious stability situation
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2010, 05:23 AM
conceptia's Avatar
conceptia conceptia is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rep: 97 Posts: 193
Location: Abu Dhabi
Quote:
Originally Posted by netjaws View Post
cristoph, be careful with using 1/2 pontoon depth as your design draft. beyond the pontoons being 1/2 submerged, your TPI decreases exponentially with each slight weight addition, leading to a very precarious stability situation
netjaws has made a good point.
__________________
Cheers
Aswin
"Aim of any argument or discussion must not be victory, but progress."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-13-2010, 07:38 AM
hoytedow's Avatar
hoytedow hoytedow is offline
Resistor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 1874 Posts: 3,359
Location: Norte de Cuba
Quote:
Originally Posted by froudedude View Post
Really, unless we get grammar and punctuation correct, America is done for. Oh, did I end a sustenance with at preposition?
Never use a preposition to end a sentence with.
__________________
Hoyt
"Lightning is very selective and will not strike crap." Wynand N
"We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy" UN IPCC Official
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-13-2010, 11:35 AM
ddrdan ddrdan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rep: 37 Posts: 66
Location: Raleigh NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by netjaws View Post
cristoph, be careful with using 1/2 pontoon depth as your design draft. beyond the pontoons being 1/2 submerged, your TPI decreases exponentially with each slight weight addition, leading to a very precarious stability situation
I received conflicting info on this same topic. How will the pontoon stability fair in the info below?

(used 62#/ft3)
Hull Shape: Square
Pontoon Size (ft): 2.0625'(bottom)* 2.02083' * 14.7' * (2)
Area (ft2): 61.25
Displacement (ft3): 126.3
Max Displacement (#): 7892
Loaded Weight (#): 3420
Volume Displaced (ft3): 53.45
Draft (in): 10.47
Freeboard (in): 13.78
Load Ratio: 42.3%
Safety factor (Base=50% of Max): 7.7% or 620#
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weight balance. Will it ride better with weight in the rear or dead center? clctrader Boat Design 4 01-24-2008 12:12 AM
Perkins 275ti to a BravoIII? WIll the bravo hold? Please help. clctrader Diesel Engines 3 07-03-2007 06:32 PM
fish hold stories awannabe Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 8 06-10-2005 01:32 AM
how well do epoxy rot replacement schemes hold up capatsue Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 4 03-18-2005 05:14 PM
Average Human Weight, Safe Excess Weight, &c. Free Pirate Boat Design 12 03-14-2005 01:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net