Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Stability
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-2006, 07:23 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 700 Posts: 3,208
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
BETTER Stability under power.

Looking for a better solution to roll controll than "Flopper Stoppers" or fin stabilizers

I am wondering if a std style centerboard would produce roll controll if fitted with a tab at the after end?

If the board case had to be wider to give the board sufficent angle of attack , or located in a different fore & aft position from a sail boat , that would not be a problem.

Cheap to install, grounding no hassle , retract when plaining.

FAST FRED



.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-2006, 08:25 AM
Crag Cay Crag Cay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 547 Posts: 629
Location: UK
Billions of dollars have been thrown at this problem. The military want stable gun platforms and passenger / cruise ships / ferries want to reduce the vomit volume, etc.

The force needed to counter act a roll is enormous. Fixed appendages on the hull (in any position) have proved to be less than effective, and more often just the source of drag. I think I have seen every conceivable variation tried, at least in the test tank. Gyros and all sorts are promised to be 'just around the corner'.

These huge anti-roll acting forces are either provided by the very long lever arms on flopper stoppers or the high hydrodynamics efficiency of fully active fins. Merely adding a trim tab to the back of the passive foil wouldn't give you anything like the moments required. You can try it out. Most sailboats have exactly the arrangement you advocate at the back of the boat. Try wiggling the tiller around and see how much much roll damping you can achieve.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-07-2006, 08:45 AM
RANCHI OTTO's Avatar
RANCHI OTTO RANCHI OTTO is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 503 Posts: 1,032
Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)
Why not an ASD (Arrow System Design) hull shape ?

No roll at all...
Attached Thumbnails
BETTER Stability under power.-manta-face.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:29 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 700 Posts: 3,208
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
If the board were "loose" in the case it could get a far better angle of attack and should develop as much force as a specialized side fin set .

It hardly matters where on the hull the roll input is given , if the roll board were the size of the combined fins , wouldn't the results be the same?

Although the roll board boat could be run aground without the damage that could sweep the roll fins.


FAST FRED
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:51 AM
RANCHI OTTO's Avatar
RANCHI OTTO RANCHI OTTO is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 503 Posts: 1,032
Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)
Adding volume in the after part you shift the l.c.b. in direction to the l.c.g. that for high speed boats is very aft.
So doing you get in planing conditions in a few seconds with no overloading of the engines.

At manouvring at full speeds (until yet I've ASD up to 86 knots) the heeling angle is less that 4 deg.

All mouvements at full speed are only vertical with no roll or porpoising at all.

More volume in engine room means, for tropical conditions, more air inside with less loss of engine performances.

The dynamic long. trim is very small and the boat runs well out of water with reduced side waves. The propulsion works in a parallel fluid with very good speed results.

The first boat is running at 53 knots, and the second one at 42 knots....
Their displacements are 20 t and 11.5 t.
In the pics they seam to be very light on water...

The second is the STAR NAJA ASD, with a displ. of 11.5 t and 2 x 425 hp has reach speeds over 40 knots in tropical conditions....not bad!
Find better....
Attached Thumbnails
BETTER Stability under power.-sea_hawk_asd-pics-1.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-08-2006, 08:55 AM
Crag Cay Crag Cay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 547 Posts: 629
Location: UK
I.m a bit confused here. What sort of application are you talking about? The ASD hull form does provide addition stability to a fast planing hull, but doesn't do much to help at displacement speeds.

A simple centreboard will damp rythmic rolling to some extent. There are reports of people having some success on slim vessels with S/L ratios around 1.5 or so. There are also loads of contrary reports as well. The consensus seems to be that passive fins on the hull have only limited success at best.

If you plan to have some method of altering the angle of attack of your centreboard, then effectively you are building a retractable stabilising fin, with all the complexity that involves. These do work and are available comercially.

But they are never mounted on the centre line. It would work like a rudder and the boats course would be all over the place.

You need to think about you axis of influence with these things. The ideal place for control surfaces that control roll are perpendicular to the topsides. This is where aeroplanes have them, and they certainly don't use vertical fins for this, ie the rudder. Unfortunately we have to lower them down the hull to get them in the water, and then a bit more to get them to stay in the water, and some times a bit more so they don't catch on the dockside. All this is reducing their efficiency. These things do induce pitch as well, but having them in equal and opposite pairs helps as does the high level of longitudinal stabilty in boats.

With very fast boats you can move then round onto the transom and have them combined with a trim tab function.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-08-2006, 12:20 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 1918 Posts: 4,113
Location: Ontario
If you have $400,000 to throw at the problem, there are a few gyro wheel systems starting to come on market.... huge power draw and insanely expensive, plus they're heavy, but reports so far indicate that most of them work pretty well.
__________________
- Matt Marsh - Marsh Design (small craft blog and designs)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-16-2007, 04:33 PM
caradot caradot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rep: 10 Posts: 1
Location: Annapolis, MD
does anyone know anything more about those gyro systems? i am in hatteras for a fishing tournament and saw a boat that apparently has a gyro installed in it. didn't get a chance to talk to anyone about it but it sure looks like it is actually a gyro.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-21-2007, 02:25 PM
messabout messabout is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 696 Posts: 1,232
Location: Lakeland Fl USA
For low speed operation a riding sail will help dampen roll but does not help much with pitch.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2007, 05:53 PM
mydauphin mydauphin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep: 472 Posts: 1,391
Location: Florida
There are many systems - depends on Boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by messabout View Post
For low speed operation a riding sail will help dampen roll but does not help much with pitch.
It is crazy to discuss this generalities. Powerboats, sailboats, large boat, small boat, planning, displacement all have different systems.

In larger boats trim tanks are used. As mention a sail can be a great dampening stabilizer. Also there are systems that move trim tabs in respond to gyro.

I rather have passive systems. Flopper stoppers can be plain dangerous. Active hydaulic stabilizers are just waiting to break.

A combination of good hull design, and passive systems might be best eventhough it might not work as well as active fins.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-29-2007, 03:50 AM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2041 Posts: 3,567
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
Fred,
Just in case you haven't already read this....
http://www.kastenmarine.com/roll_attenuation.htm
Cheers.
__________________
Guillermo Gefaell
Moon Yacht Design
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-29-2007, 04:30 AM
kengrome kengrome is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Rep: 287 Posts: 719
Location: Gulf Coast USA
What's wrong with a sail? It not only dampens rolling motion but it also makes the boat more efficient. Sometimes simple or low-tect really is the best solution ...
__________________
Kenneth Grome
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stability software CGN Software 18 04-25-2009 05:51 PM
Stability of power dory davflaws Boat Design 30 07-18-2007 04:15 AM
Stability Calculations Unstable Boat Design 11 05-08-2006 08:23 PM
Sail power and horse power? kjell Motorsailers 12 09-03-2005 04:20 AM
stability Guest Boat Design 2 12-30-2003 03:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net