Why do people keep on claiming that sailors are conservative about rigs?

Discussion in 'Sailboats' started by CT249, Oct 16, 2016.

  1. CT249
    Joined: May 2003
    Posts: 1,449
    Likes: 191, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 215
    Location: Sydney Australia

    CT249 Senior Member

    It was more of a general comment, Brian. However, your post is an example of incorrect facts being used to denigrate other people.

    The specific examples you give are examples of logic, not conservatism. Cascade was a very slow 37 footer that just happened to rate extraordinarily low due to a rule loophole. There were two alternatives - one, scrap lots of existing boats and replace them with much slower craft; two, change the rules. It was NOT "conservatism" to stop people having to buy much slower boats!

    Mother nature's rule showed that Cascade was actually slow. It was only a loophole that made her look fast. To complain because rules make boats slower and then to champion one of the slowest rulebeaters of all seems to be rather illogical. Cascade's rating was adjusted because it was not logical to allow a boat to sail through a loophole in a rule that encouraged boats that were even slower than the standard yachts of the day. That is logic, not conservatism.

    I haven't been able to find as much information about Hawkeye. However, there are some references that state that the King bilgeboarders were dangerously low in ultimate stability. Mother ocean's rule would surely demand that we do NOT reward boats that will stay upside down. It is not conservatism to discourage boats that are more likely to kill people.

    Finally, it is completely false to claim that long battens were foreign to "traditionalists" within the period of handicap rules. Long battens were used by racing canoes in the 19th century. They were dropped because in the technology of the time they were often slower and more hassle than sails with no battens or short battens. They were used by Renjollen, Hornets, Vee Jays, Diamonds, Gwens and other classes long before they became de rigeur in multis.

    It's apparent that you think you are just the smartest kid on the block, but there IS doubt as to the superiority of long battens. That is why they didn't become universal, and why some of the latest popular classes in dinghies don't use them.

    The factual basis on which you make your allegation of conservatism is incorrect. Therefore the claim is also probably incorrect. It can also be said that your claims basically consist of saying "they were wrong, I am right". When you say there is no doubt about the superiority of full battens, for example, you are putting yourself on a lofty pedestal from which you are sneering at people like the guys behind RS Sailboats, who design outstanding new boats without full battens and do so for very good reasons. It's odd that it seems so hard for some people to just respect other sailors and the reasons they choose their craft.

    Finally, if people were so conservative, why do so many of them make the "leap" from the freestanding non-bermudan rigs so many of them learned to sail on, into bermudan rigs? If people are so conservative why are there so many different rigs among the popular small craft?
     
  2. Richard Woods
    Joined: Jun 2006
    Posts: 2,209
    Likes: 175, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1244
    Location: Back full time in the UK

    Richard Woods Woods Designs

    Many years ago I raced in a major offshore race with a mixed fleet of monohulls and multihulls. One of the monohulls had an unstayed modified junk rig with wrap round sails. The owner was bragging before the race how the rig was so efficient he would win easily. On the first leg he came dead last (I won). On the second leg his mast broke.

    One major advantage of the conventional stayed rig is that it is easy to tune the rig to the sail. Another is that the sailmaker does most of the sail shape work, the more corners of a sail you have, and the greater the number of sails, the more skillful the sailors have to be to get them all drawing properly.

    One major problem with the unstayed rig is that the mast manufacturer has to make the mast exactly right first time. Otherwise it maybe too stiff or too flexible. Easy for a production boatyard to experiment, especially on dinghy sizes. That was a major problem for the D0 at first, Devoti had to spend a lot of money making various masts before getting it right. Laser even had problems with their metal masts. Less easy to do for one offs. I have seen many too flexible or too stiff

    BTW last winter I sailed a Freedom 45 with unstayed mast, a Sunfish ditto, and a Bahamian Class a sloop, ditto

    There is a tendency for people to say "the old ways are best" which is a depressing thought for the human race. But also the old ways often were actually the best way with the technology available at the time. Back in the days of wood masts, battens and cotton sails few were able to get a fully battened sail to work properly. Now its no problem, except that the sail is never as flexible, so harder to read" in light winds. So a full battened head and "soft" bottom is often still a good compromise

    Richard Woods of Woods Designs

    www.sailingcatamarans.com
     
  3. brian eiland
    Joined: Jun 2002
    Posts: 5,067
    Likes: 216, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 1903
    Location: St Augustine Fl, Thailand

    brian eiland Senior Member

    I'm not saying anything like that at all,...I'm just trying to point out a few 'technologies' that didn't seem to get a chance to progress further due to 'rules and handicap modifications'.

    I don't have the time nor inclination to look up many other examples that other folks have brought up both in the past and up to present.

    I'm glad there are not as many restrictive rules in place for the design of those big multihulls that are racing around the world and across the oceans for ever new record times.
     
  4. Richard Woods
    Joined: Jun 2006
    Posts: 2,209
    Likes: 175, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1244
    Location: Back full time in the UK

    Richard Woods Woods Designs

    Most boatyards these days are run by accountants, not designers or builders. So it is no surprise that innovation is stifled by those holding the purse strings and who have no imagination. Thus many boats look the same, the boring AWB. Its the same with cars of course, and can you tell the difference between an Airbus and a Boeing?

    Actually there are restrictions on race boats, mainly to control costs. The Volvo is now 1D for example

    RW
     
  5. brian eiland
    Joined: Jun 2002
    Posts: 5,067
    Likes: 216, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 1903
    Location: St Augustine Fl, Thailand

    brian eiland Senior Member

    Procyon, a BOLD experiment

    BTW, here is an example of a bold new experiment that was carried out while ignoring the current handicap rules existing at her time.

     
  6. rob denney
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 890
    Likes: 285, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 436
    Location: Australia

    rob denney Senior Member

    Interesting. I have done it on cats and proas and read about it on a mono, but can't remember wher. (uMaybe Mike Storer's Goat Us skiff?) All worked. Some unstayed rig boats also sail very heavily by the lee, with the main at 120 degrees or more without problems.

    One of the noticable things about the aero rig is that with a large roach main, the leech area of the mainsail fills first when the sail is sheeted on, which gives strong weather helm. Not a problem if the helmsman is aware of it, but it can catch novices unawares. It can also be fixed by applying some topping lift to bend the mast and open the leech, but this is an extra job.

    Maybe this is happening with the lateen, which also has a lot of area aft and no way to move the coe forward? It would be even worse if the mast was in the bow vs in the middle on a proa or ~ 1/3rd aft on a cat.
    What do you use for leeway resistance?

    The solution (with a una rig) if you had to gybe in a squall would be to let the sheet run and the sail weathercock, then head up slightly before sheeting in so the forces were more aligned.

    Even if you can't sail with the sail out the front, it will still be a lot safer to put it there in a squall and either wait for it to pass, or reef it.

    Barra,
    It does not include those masts (we broke 2 of them) , nor the ones I have broken since. Read my post about poor design or build causing masts to break. These (and a whole lot of other bits and pieces like rudders, sails, hulls and beams) were all for me and part of developing lighter boats with easier build techniques.
    There has been some progress on both fronts. The first big carbon mast I built was in steel moulds, with high pressure (105 psi/7 atm) and heat (105C/220F). A similar one now would weigh about half as much and be built with neither moulds, mandrels or special equipment.

    Chris,
    I don't follow your reasoning on psychology as it applies to rig choice, and don't care enough to argue about it. If you can't see that if the variety of rig choices in dinghies = non conservatism, then the lack of variety in cruising rigs = conservatism, we can agree to disagree.

    I was not having a go at you, nor do I care whether you consider yourself "conservative" or not. I admire your work, and have changed some of my attitudes due to your research and reasoning. However, when you get away from this, you do say some silly things. One of them was "supposed reduced maintenance of freestanding rigs".

    To more important things:
     
  7. CT249
    Joined: May 2003
    Posts: 1,449
    Likes: 191, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 215
    Location: Sydney Australia

    CT249 Senior Member

    Rob;

    Thanks for your kind words. Sometimes I do say things here with the aim of stirring discussion or presenting a possible alternative point of view.

    Re Wyliecats; you didn't limit your claim to 30 footers in any way, explicitly or implicitly. Nor am I under any obligation to carry out a full investigation into the loss of the 39's rig, since it proves that your claim was incorrect or incomplete and therefore maybe I am not the only one making "silly statements".

    Personally, I like freestanding masts (although I don't think they are the best for all purposes) and (from what I can see of them) Wyliecats. However the point is that while it is quite likely that they are more reliable, there doesn't seem to be objective evidence to that effect. Okay, the Wyliecat 30 seems to have a good record - but is it BETTER than the dismasting record of (say) Northshore 38s, which aren't a boat I particularly like but which don't seem to drop rigs very often? Is the Wyliecat 30's rate of mast loss less than that of Contessa 32s or X99s or some other group of yachts? Furthermore, when we assess the losses of conventional rigs, we'd have to discount those that have been poorly modified, as in the case of Uno.

    When there has been no such examination of comparable groups with different rig types, there is no conclusive objective evidence that one type has superior failure rates.

    It is untrue to claim that I am "ignoring the reality" of cruising wives. I am reflecting what I have been told by the two experienced cruising wives I have discussed rig design with. I didn't make any blanket claim about the majority of them. I am not going to make any declarations about what the ones I haven't discussed rigs with think about them. On the other hand, the views of one of the most experienced cruising women in the world are of interest IMHO.

    I don't like the standard cruising multi rig you mention for several reasons, including that I find the squaretop mains ON CRUISING BOATS often choke (in the light) or twist too much (in a breeze), the gust response is poor, and overall rig weight appears to be very heavy. I'd personally probably prefer one of your rigs. However, that is MY personal taste and nothing more - it's just like the fact that I prefer sauvignon blanc to chardonnay, Formula 18 cats to Skiffs, and track cycling to crits. Similarly, if owners of big cats find that the "standard rig" suits their sailing that's great.

    The fact that we all have personal preferences is why your list of issues associated with the "conventional" rigs is not a list of objective reasons why such rigs are inferior. It is merely one person's own list of issues that have to be traded off against other people's personal list of issues. If someone gives a different list or a different weighting to those trade-offs it is not proof that they are "conservative", it may simply show that they have different personal tastes and preferences. You dismiss the issue of bias, but it's something that scientists and other professionals accept as something we all have, and along with personal preferences it must influence the weighting that people - including you and I - give to various factors in rig design.

    I am dubious about claims that cruisers are "conservative" in their rig choice, since they very act of moving onto a small boat and going cruising is a very unusual one. Obviously one can be conventional in some areas while still being a cruiser, but it seems that they are not a particularly conservative group of people.

    Small boat rigs are relevant because it may indicate sailors in general are not conservative about rig choice. They often move happily from unstayed sprit cat rig (Opti) to unstayed bermudan cat rig (Laser) or spinnaker fractional sloop rig (420/Cadet/FJ etc) and then often to jib-and-main fractional sloop (Snipe/Tasar/Ent) and then to masthead big-boat rig. They have often demonstrated that they ARE willing to change rigs several times in their sailing career, therefore there is room to doubt that the same people suddenly become conservative when they move to bigger boats.

    Finally, when my family first bought a cruising cat, the vast majority of them were probably Prout-style rigs, or conventional masthead rigs with in-line spreaders. Now, as you say, a very different rig is standard on multis. This change in multi rigs (as technology has changed ) seems to bely the conservatism charge.


    PS - I've experienced the issue Zilver writes about, when I've accidentally let an over-length Laser mainsheet go out too far. A similar issue can be experienced with windsurfer rigs.
     
  8. CT249
    Joined: May 2003
    Posts: 1,449
    Likes: 191, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 215
    Location: Sydney Australia

    CT249 Senior Member

    Well, your post can very easily be read as being a criticism of those in charge of the "arbitrary, man made rules" and others. As an example, take fully-battened mains. You offer only two alternatives for their slower uptake - the rating rules you have already condemned, or a reluctance to adopt "foreign" ideas. The fact that you didn't appear to allow for the fact that the rules could have been managed as they were for good reasons, and the fact that you didn't allow for the fact that the slower adoption of full battens in big moos was for good reasons, indicate that you are being dismissive of the sailors you were referring to.

    As Richard notes, there were and are good reasons to stay away from full battens in some types, and in earlier times there were even better reasons. I say that as someone who is about to fit full battens in a jib.

    Many (in fact I would say the dramatic majority) of issues with rating rules that most people bring up are fabrications. For example, here we had one designer claim that offshore rating rules banned rotating masts (not always true) and that they used wires to determine rig measurements (untrue, with one exception).
     
  9. CT249
    Joined: May 2003
    Posts: 1,449
    Likes: 191, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 215
    Location: Sydney Australia

    CT249 Senior Member

    Oh, maybe my OP should not have said that the claims of conservatism are complete rubbish. A proportion of rig choices are probably driven by conservatism, and a proportion are perhaps driven by a desire to appear to be different. However, the variety of rigs in small craft seems to indicate to me that sailors per se are not ruled by conservatism when it comes to rig choices.

    I can't find many details about the current rigs used by cruisers, however there are quite a few sources that indicate a big switch away from ketches to sloops - a major change of the sort that conservatives would arguably reject.

    Secondly - if we use say "people reject innovations because they are conservative" too readily, then we may well be missing another and more valid reason for their actions. Looking at the history of the sport leaves little doubt that allegations of conservatism have been used too often in the past, and surely if we seek to understand the present we should only resort to them when other possibilities have been examined objectively and dispassionately.
     
  10. motorbike
    Joined: Mar 2011
    Posts: 165
    Likes: 10, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 87
    Location: Beam Reach

    motorbike Senior Member

    Heres my take on it,

    Boatbuilders and yachtsmen are for the most part sensible and not prone to throwing away money or performance for no good reason. Over many years the so called "conventional" bermudan rig has risen to the top like the superb cream that it is. There are a few flavours including stayed and unstayed but the principle remains true, they give the best handling and performance for the cost with a few exceptions and specialised local applications. Look at aeroplane wings, which would, if the problem of handling (and ballast) could be solved, be pretty much the end game if performance was the only factor.

    Being pretty however is a matter of taste, and certain types of rig have specialised benefits. I am glad we have junk rigs even though they sail poorly compared to bermudan, unstayed rigs are great but only if you dont fly extras or headsails.

    The next evolution or revolution is rigs will be materials based, not design. The world of larger stayed boats will not be usurped by junk rigs or unstayed masts anymore than ferro cement will rule the waves. However ferro and junk rigs do go together like horse and carriage, so perhaps their time is yet to come?
     
  11. brian eiland
    Joined: Jun 2002
    Posts: 5,067
    Likes: 216, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 1903
    Location: St Augustine Fl, Thailand

    brian eiland Senior Member

    De-ketchification of America

    Perhaps you might have a read thru this article by Eric Sponberg.

    He makes some interesting points about the ketch rig, and why they may not be so much more in vogue these days
     

    Attached Files:

  12. brian eiland
    Joined: Jun 2002
    Posts: 5,067
    Likes: 216, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 1903
    Location: St Augustine Fl, Thailand

    brian eiland Senior Member

    Sailing Challenge

    I recently caught up with an old friend who skippered Olaf Harken's unusual vessel Procyon for its first few years. I showed him a model of my 'single-masted ketch' concept, and then just the other day I sent him a copy of this 'sailing challenge' I had issued to a few naysayers in the past.


    Randy sent me a reply this morning...
     
  13. mydauphin
    Joined: Apr 2007
    Posts: 2,161
    Likes: 53, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 575
    Location: Florida

    mydauphin Senior Member

    My dad can beat up your dad...
     
  14. brian eiland
    Joined: Jun 2002
    Posts: 5,067
    Likes: 216, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 1903
    Location: St Augustine Fl, Thailand

    brian eiland Senior Member

    Was that directed at me?, I don't understand if it was??
     

  15. CT249
    Joined: May 2003
    Posts: 1,449
    Likes: 191, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 215
    Location: Sydney Australia

    CT249 Senior Member

    Brian, the second post's references are still simply instances where a couple of people feel that "alternative" rigs suit them better. That's fine - but it does nothing to prove that other sailors are conservative about rig choice.

    Okay, a guy wants to sail a 65 foot cat by himself, so he would like a certain rig. So what? It doesn't prove that people who want to sail other boats in other places and other situations are ruled by conservatism when they choose a different rig. Okay, so someone rates being able to set sail quickly very highly, so he wants an all-furling rig. That's great - but it does not have any bearing on the choices made by other people to whom other factors are more important.

    The Sponberg piece says that rig choice has changed. How can something that says that tastes have changed be used to prove that tastes are conservative? Look at the language in the article - it speaks of how "equipment choices have expanded and improved so much....big mainsail is now easily tamed...all this new equipment". So Eric's piece speaks of innovations and changes that have been created and adopted - not of conservatism.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. Ray Cover
    Replies:
    15
    Views:
    6,111
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.