Twin Keel Righting Moment

Discussion in 'Sailboats' started by Willallison, Apr 1, 2006.

  1. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Here's a "how long's a piece of string' question for you!
    What you you regard as a typical RM30 for a twin (bilge) keeled, 50ft sailboat?
     
  2. SailDesign
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 1,964
    Likes: 151, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 650
    Location: Jamestown, RI, USA

    SailDesign Old Phart! Stay upwind..

    Never seen a 50' bilge-keeled sailboat... :)
     
  3. bhnautika
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 57, Points: 38, Legacy Rep: 571
    Location: australia

    bhnautika Senior Member

    Why would twin bilge keels have anything to do with RM30? Displacement X GZ
     
  4. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

    Will

    Exactly the same as its typical sistership with a single keel.
     
  5. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    yes, yes - sorry - too much, yet not enough info!;) I know it will be the same as a single keeled job...
    let me rephrase... does 14700 kg.m seem a sensible RM30 for a 50ft sailboat?
     
  6. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

    Will
    Yes that is a perfectly sensible figure.
    Still a lot more to consider ....intended use....also consider whether she will be jerky ie, what will the roll inertia be , how much damping from her keel.......

    Is this a theoretical exercise or a commission ?
     
  7. RHough
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 1,792
    Likes: 61, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 793
    Location: BC Summers / Nayarit Winters

    RHough Retro Dude

    Um ... close, what LWL?

    14700 kg.m = 106,000 ft lb

    From Skene's I'd expect that RM30 on a 41-43 ft LWL
     
  8. bhnautika
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 57, Points: 38, Legacy Rep: 571
    Location: australia

    bhnautika Senior Member

    What displacement are you estimating?
     
  9. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Mike - No, no commission.... a little bird tells me you live in these parts.... I'm sure you'll hear about it the day I manage to land my 1st 'job'!:p ... just a lesson submission.

    bhnautika - Off the top of my head, displacement is about 16 tons...
     
  10. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

    Will , Rhough

    Intended use infers consideration of all the design ratios before you start worrying too much about conformity with norms, so if the figure looks sensible its good enough for the design spiral, very easy to lower RM with out any major changes but much harder to increase it. So often best to shoot high then see how your rollover curves look, remember that stability drops drastically with all the parephenalia that gets afixed these days, so you should always account for all sorts of extra gear in your W & M calcs.


    I have a 7 acre bush block in the hills behind Margate with 'glimpses' of the channel and storm bay. Getting time to sail North for winter.
     
  11. bhnautika
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 57, Points: 38, Legacy Rep: 571
    Location: australia

    bhnautika Senior Member

    Will, Do you think your design can get .9 of a metre GZ
     
  12. RHough
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 1,792
    Likes: 61, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 793
    Location: BC Summers / Nayarit Winters

    RHough Retro Dude

    Rm90-95?

    While we're on the topic of RM ... What would be a good target for RM when the masthead is in the water (RM90?)?

    for reference, the Mini-Transat rule requires that the boat be self righting with (IIRC) 45kg at the masthead, the ballast in any position and the masthead in the water.

    Is there a guideline or rule of thumb that gives a number to shoot for?
     
  13. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Mike - funny how small the world really is isn't it.... I've got 5 acres (and a shed almost big enough to build a boat....) just out of Kingston!

    bhnatutika - I'll take a look tonight when I get home, not sure what the GZ was off the top of my head...
     
  14. bhnautika
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 57, Points: 38, Legacy Rep: 571
    Location: australia

    bhnautika Senior Member

    Rdough the mini-T’s have a max mast height of 12 metres above the waterline, assuming about 11 metres from the mast head to the new centre of buoyancy at 90 degrees of heel that’s around 495 kg\m. Displacement for these boats is around 900 Kg. A GZ of .6 of a metre would be the minimum at 90 degree.
     

  15. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    bhnautika - GZ is 0.76m

    Incidentally, I've been thinking about the comments you guys made about RM being the same regardless of keel type. At the time this made sense, but on further thought I'm not sure I understand why....
    The keel(s) are included in the 'model' used for the RM calculations and as there is so much variation between the two forms I would expect variation in the RM as well.
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.