Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #856  
Old 08-01-2005, 11:00 AM
skinny boy skinny boy is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 52
Location: Anartica
Since you seem to so ignorant that you can not understand intellectual proprety laws. Let me demonstrate a basic one for you.

The below image posted on this site illegally by you contains an R in a circle. which means it is a registered symbol. If, as you claim, is was created by the people whom the logo (also registered) was taken, Sailing Anarchy, then it is only allowed to be used by them or with them express permission.

You are not associated with them, nor do you have express permission to reprint them material or use their logos or registered symbols.

Therefore you are once again showing yourself as the lying, cheating, stealing, lowest form of human excrement that you are.

As for the your abuse of the Internet not costing the state of Wshington anything, I guess your are right it is costing the tax payers money. You posting during business hours however is costing the state money. You are fraudulently billing hours for time you spend on the Internet at boat design. The amount you post on the Internet means you are not spending time focusing on quality work. If I were a resident of the state I would demand lower taxes because if you have time to troll the net the state really doesn't need your services and would be better off lowering the tax burden on its citizens or getting better care to its citizens.

As a so-called management consultant you should certainly understand the value of an hourly employees time to get focused work done and certainly you know that studies have shown that Internet trolling reduces productivity by 25%.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
Rolltacker

Uh...people aren't using your site as an educational resource, they are using it to help them understand you. Trace logs show that many of your visitors come from 66.63.128.89 aka sailinganarchy.com which has shat you out along time ago. Further, you have put "Sailing Anarchy" in your keywords, which is punishable by law. I see weirdos on the street every day who are dilusionally ranting to themselves. I can't help but stop and watch these type of people. This is similar to why people go to your site. If you'd like to find out if people are using your site for education, put a poll on the site. Make sure to include "because I think you're crazy" in the "why are you here question".

Folks want the truth. They find it here and on my weblog. Check out the transpac reports - The Cone of Silence 100 mile report note - This must be an error. What a show stealer. But did a J35 named Diablo also prove something?

I have no idea why you think Sailing Anarchy in keywords is punishable by law. See http://www.cybercrime.gov/. In anycase, the editor needs to contact me by mail 1260 NE 69th street Seattle Wa 98115, if he objects and I certainly will remove the keyword (truth be known - I didn't know about that). If he does contact me, I will know who to send a proposal to for the T shirts we want made up. Best I can tell the following is his artwork



Truth is that there is hardly a topic on Sailing Anarchy were someone doesn't eventually come up with - but what about a Mac26x or what do you think He whoes name will not be mentioned thinks about that? Or is this guy really Mighetto? Or Assman,... he really cracks me up. "I was banned from SA once but then I redeemed myself by pretending I was Mighetto".. It cracks me and my wife up constantly. Crank Boy is a love child of La Douch! Regarding Sailing Anarchy, I simply stopped posting there. There was a bet involved. I do see that someone claiming to be the editor is saying I was banned. After that July 4th post by the editor perhaps that is a kindness. Nonetheless, I am obviously missed. If those owning SA have a problem have them send in a demand by regular mail - it will be dealt with immediatly. But best I can tell, they like me We have a synergy that makes us greater than we would be without eachother.
Reply With Quote
  #857  
Old 08-01-2005, 11:10 AM
Tripp Gal Tripp Gal is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rep: 10 Posts: 7
Location: US
Frank Mighetto,

I have asked on numerous occasions and bulletin boards for you to refrain from including me in your communications. You lack of consideration in this matter has me believing that you either ignored or have misunderstood my requests.

Leave me alone. Do not include me in your communications.

Sudie Parker
Reply With Quote
  #858  
Old 08-01-2005, 07:17 PM
CT 249 CT 249 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rep: 286 Posts: 1,140
Location: Sydney Australia
"Wasn't that why SH boats were allowed to race with that ratio up until 1999 and are grandfathered in even today. Instead of reacting as the TP52 rules demonstrate with a requirement of 128 stability shouldn't water ballast be considered instead because the flat, thin, planing, water ballasted, center boarded extreme sailing machines took the exact same storm at about the same place and did so without undo problems and single handed under sail!"

You arrogant asswipe. You bigoted, boorish ********ting buffoon. You cranky conniving c......no, let's stop there.

You are perhaps the most dishonest liar I have ever come across.

Frank, you have been told time and time again that the S-H boats were hundreds of miles from the area where the Around Alone boats were sailing. There was a whole STATE between them AND the 180 miles of Bass Strait. There was about 400+ miles between the S-H fleet and the Around Alone.

You have been shown copies from the logs of the AA boats that prove this. You have been shown maps. You have been shown weather reports. And yet you lack the maturity, the manhood, the common decency to retract this sort of lie.That's only to be expected from a coward and a bully like you.

And even YOU, you ignorant muddle-headed stew of pus, you up-yourself emodiment of all things crappy, eve YOU should have been able to work out by now that the AA boats are FAT FAT FAT - 20' beam or more. They are the beamiest of big boats. Their seaworthiness points out exactly why your pathetic little scrap of plastic pool toy should never see a real ocean.

You really are the lowest form of human being.
Reply With Quote
  #859  
Old 08-01-2005, 09:38 PM
mighetto's Avatar
mighetto mighetto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: -6 Posts: 676
Location: water world
CT 249

Frank, you have been told time and time again that the S-H boats were hundreds of miles from the area where the Around Alone boats were sailing. There was a whole STATE between them AND the 180 miles of Bass Strait. There was about 400+ miles between the S-H fleet and the Around Alone.

What a treat, CT 249. OK guy cough it up. What do you know about that builder who is known for Sydney Hobart fleet boats that is also producing Mac26x vessels?
Reply With Quote
  #860  
Old 08-01-2005, 10:04 PM
mighetto's Avatar
mighetto mighetto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: -6 Posts: 676
Location: water world
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripp Gal
Frank Mighetto,

I have asked on numerous occasions and bulletin boards for you to refrain from including me in your communications. You lack of consideration in this matter has me believing that you either ignored or have misunderstood my requests.

Leave me alone. Do not include me in your communications.

Sudie Parker
Sudie Parker, that will happen as soon as you resign as a PHRF Handicaper. It has taken us almost two years to identify you. What a shame that you turn out to be one of those we look to for rating our vessels and support in getting our kind on to the race courses. One whoes duty is to grow the sport and not restrict it by excluding vessels you do not understand. You can do the sport and PHRF NW much good by getting out of the way. Get out of the way and stop posting under other handels. Send your thugs to the showers. For those interested in the power of the Gal see.

http://www.phrf-nw.org/PDF.%20forms/JAN05_23BMTG.pdf

Lets see a Tripp 47 in the Secretary Series. Oh never enough water to float your boat - is there Note smiley. As fate has it I will be sailing a slightly smaller Tripp in about 6 weeks. Take Care, Sexy Little Amish Girl May your sail into the sunset be a pleasent one. Its Sailing Anarchy now that there is IRC. http://www.sailinganarchy.com/forums...c=21317&st=100

I try to be charming

Frank L. Mighetto
Member US Sailing
Member PHRF
Member SSSS - home of kick arse sailors like me
Reply With Quote
  #861  
Old 08-02-2005, 08:49 AM
TheFarSide TheFarSide is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 29
Location: The Real World
Geez, Frank. There are probably thousands of others in this world who don't like their rating, but they don't turn into a friggin' internet libeler/slanderer/stalker like you because of it. Is that what it all boils down to--Tripp Gal is the handicapper who "done ya wrong?"
Reply With Quote
  #862  
Old 08-02-2005, 10:03 AM
WildCherry WildCherry is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 35
Location: bama
Hey Frank. Do you like apples?

{Loss of stability while powering..
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 5:17 pm Post subject: Loss of stability while powering

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Has anyone encountered this problem? I have a '96 I have seen it with both my old 50 HP Mercury and my new ETEC 90. In rare occasions while powering at 18 MPH or higher I lose directional stability. Ballast is empty, rudders are up and the centerboard is fully up (I have verified the latter.) Last weekend it occurred after I was passed from astern by two powerboats, one on each side of me. The wakes were quite small; maybe 12 to 18 inches. As the wakes hit my stern quarters, the bow started to wander and the boat started to heel back and forth from one side to another. These oscillations continued to increase in severity with each oscillation. It feels to me that if I were to continue high speed powering, the boat would quickly roll over on its side. It's not unlike what happens when you forger to bring the centerboard all the way up and try a high speed turn except that the boat oscillates from side to side instead of just heeling away from the turn. I've learned that the only way to recover is to immediately chop the power. This brings the boat back under control.

I'm speculating that the problem is related to the fact that at high speed, the forward section of the hull is out of the water and the boat is planing on the aft half of the hull. Would adjusting the motor mount to try and bring the bow down help? Has anyone else experienced this and/or found a solution?

Thanks is advance.

Bob Cameron
Spirit of the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #863  
Old 08-02-2005, 10:29 AM
Shife Shife is offline
Anarchist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 9 Posts: 148
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
Sudie Parker, that will happen as soon as you resign as a PHRF Handicaper. It has taken us almost two years to identify you. What a shame that you turn out to be one of those we look to for rating our vessels and support in getting our kind on to the race courses. One whoes duty is to grow the sport and not restrict it by excluding vessels you do not understand. You can do the sport and PHRF NW much good by getting out of the way. Get out of the way and stop posting under other handels. Send your thugs to the showers. For those interested in the power of the Gal see.

http://www.phrf-nw.org/PDF.%20forms/JAN05_23BMTG.pdf

Lets see a Tripp 47 in the Secretary Series. Oh never enough water to float your boat - is there Note smiley. As fate has it I will be sailing a slightly smaller Tripp in about 6 weeks. Take Care, Sexy Little Amish Girl May your sail into the sunset be a pleasent one. Its Sailing Anarchy now that there is IRC. http://www.sailinganarchy.com/forums...c=21317&st=100

I try to be charming

Frank L. Mighetto
Member US Sailing
Member PHRF
Member SSSS - home of kick arse sailors like me

Wow Frank, what a perfect example of defamation of character and harassment at the same time. You truly are no better than the slime that covers the bottom of your boat. You repeatedly attack a woman who does nothing other than volunteer her time to the sport of sailing. It has been proven time and again that your claims are nothing more than lies and fantasy. I really hope that you get all that is coming to you and more in a court of law. You have got to be the worlds ultimate sore loser.
Reply With Quote
  #864  
Old 08-02-2005, 12:13 PM
mighetto's Avatar
mighetto mighetto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: -6 Posts: 676
Location: water world
Geez, Frank. There are probably thousands of others in this world who don't like their rating, but they don't turn into a friggin' internet libeler/slanderer/stalker like you because of it. Is that what it all boils down to--Tripp Gal is the handicapper who "done ya wrong?"

Lets call her Sudie Parker from now on. No public figure should hide behind a comic book name. She obviously knows that she has been doing evil and hence the handle. I do the sport great service by identifying her publically.

Sudie Parker has yanked the balls off of many a sailing man and not just one of mine. Tonight Lightening Rod Tharp will be holding his Performance Sailing Seminar in Olympia. These seminars promote the Bethewaite sailing style. Lightening Rod will never post on the Internet again because of Sudie who called him a "Little Man" on The South Sound Sailing Society board. It is this kind of loss to the sport that is intollerable.


In Puget Sound, we know how to avoid Suidie Parker and her kind for the most part. We simply join clubs where she isn't the rater. Clubs like South Sound Sailing Society, Tacoma Yacht Club and Olympia Yacht club. And we strongly support IRC. I am proposing that the reason clubs in her rating area have declined in membership is owing to her and the reason we will soon be racing IRC is owing to her. But again she is but symptom, a pimple on the larger problem that gave us the Seattle entry in the last Americas cup.

It was owing to Sudie Parker stalking that the SSSS Board was shut down. It is owing to her that we do not have an SSSS Assistant Race Chair.

Sudie should be coughing up the testicals of sailing men she has harmed big time, right now. A man has to do what a man has to do and that involves reclaiming testicals She literally is distroying PHRF - NW. IRC would be no where as popular as it is becoming had she represented the sport appropriately by supporting retractable foils and movable ballast as ISAF directed when it changed rules 51 and 52 to allow them, seven years ago.

She is not just politically incorrect by supporting the big fixed fin boats, ensuring that the little boats do not get rated appropriately for foil retraction. (Those who do battle must learn to retract their testicals. ), she is also geographically incorrect.

You do not have a Central West Virgina or a Central Carolina. It is East or West or North or South. You do not send men and woman central. Good young designers go west.

Sudie Parker rates boats for "Central Puget Sound". This area doesn't exist. She has carved out a section of the Sound purposefully to promote the big boats at the detriment of the vessels that US Sailing now holds out to be the future of not only yacht design but also the sailing sport in the US. She isn't getting out of the way. Those of honor must now do battle.

Let her engage me here. Or let her return the balls she as bitten off of Dan Decker, Steve Worcester, Rod Tharp, Ian Christopher, Scot Tempesta, Sean Trew, and my self. One thing is certain. She never more will be effective as a rater. Long after the world forgets mighetto, they will remember that there is something wrong with a woman who likes being called a Gal.

I have now made my sailor's confession. The church of FOYD is in operation on Sailing Anarchy. Mr. Ed is presiding.

PS, The SSSS rater is fantastic. I have no trouble at all with Murrelet's rating. There is a Gal related story there if you want to hear it. It is related to design.
Reply With Quote
  #865  
Old 08-02-2005, 12:23 PM
Shife Shife is offline
Anarchist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 9 Posts: 148
Location: Michigan
Man you are F'ed in the head Frank. Do you actually believe what you just posted? Show PROOF in every point you made in that last post. Not "your word", but actual proof. Otherwise, be a man and retract your lies.
Reply With Quote
  #866  
Old 08-02-2005, 12:32 PM
mighetto's Avatar
mighetto mighetto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: -6 Posts: 676
Location: water world
Man you are F'ed in the head Frank. Do you actually believe what you just posted? Show PROOF in every point you made in that last post. Not "your word", but actual proof. Otherwise, be a man and retract your lies.

Oh come on. A man from Michigan. Read this thread from its start. Then consider that evidence of wrong doing has now been removed from Sailing Anarchy, the South Sound Sailing Society Bullitine Board, and Sailnet. If you read from the beginning you will find that I was contacted by a desiger from your area, confirming the notion that builders and designers are PAID not to deliver superior model sail boats. The same is true with Internet sites. Board operators are PAID to shut them down to remove evidence.

Sudie Parker refuses to state publically that she has no ties to Jim Teeters. That "taking the 4th" is enough proof for a court of public opinion. Let her engage me directly and publically. We are a forgiving nation. Let us hear her confession. (Air America - I still have troubles with it but what the heck) Mr Ed is waiting on Sailing Anarchy.
Reply With Quote
  #867  
Old 08-02-2005, 12:49 PM
Shife Shife is offline
Anarchist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 9 Posts: 148
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
Then consider that evidence of wrong doing has now been removed from Sailing Anarchy, the South Sound Sailing Society Bullitine Board, and Sailnet.
You were kicked out of Sailing Anarchy and Sailnet. The admin of the SSSS board has informed you of why that board was shut down. None of this was done to remove "evidence", it was done because you are a habitual liar who refuses to accept reality. Again, post proof of the accusations you have made or delete your lies.
Reply With Quote
  #868  
Old 08-02-2005, 01:02 PM
TheFarSide TheFarSide is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 29
Location: The Real World
A historically typical "Frank" response. A LOT of BS that dances around the issue, isn't substantiated, doesn't answer the question, and these days, is mostly just personal insults.

Did Sudie assign you the 241 I see on your PHRF roster line, Frank? If not, what's your beef? What is it about that 241 that drives you to such obsession, Frank?
Reply With Quote
  #869  
Old 08-02-2005, 01:23 PM
mighetto's Avatar
mighetto mighetto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: -6 Posts: 676
Location: water world
You were kicked out of Sailing Anarchy and Sailnet. The admin of the SSSS board has informed you of why that board was shut down. None of this was done to remove "evidence", it was done because you are a habitual liar who refuses to accept reality. Again, post proof of the accusations you have made or delete your lies.

Well OK. Lets first pin down the accusation. I acuse Sudie Parker of unsportsman like behavior that includes dishonering PHRF NW and US Sailing. The last straw was her Swiftsure stunt that put a man overboard in danger. Instead of immediately withdrawing from the race (which is what Seahorse International says is normal after ripping a main sail) she dittled around without engine power allowing the boat to broach and putting the man in the water in the first place. Then while sailing back to the MOB, she refusing to use her engine, or succesfully broadcast the event on radio. This Man overboard could well have been Scott Awalt a member of South Sound Sailing Society who had previously to this event been one of her bow men. Scott has not had a ball removed by Sudie yet and remains a supporter. His time will come. I aim to save it. Scott instead had called for the reef. I acuse Sudie of operating an unseaworthy vessel in the Swiftsure because she never learned to reef and had never reefed her vessel. I suspect that someone put in a rule 69 report against Sudie owing to that. Possibly a witness on White Cloud. The deadline was a week or so ago. But it wasn't me. I had earlier put in a 69 report, the draft which was reviewed on this forum (less the names) and lost one of my testicals because I withdrew that report, something I greatly regret because it was predictive of what happened in the Swiftsure.

Think this through from the perspective of one charged with Board repsonsibilties. I see this kind of thing. I know it is my duty to speak out. I also know that the club has purchased insurance that protects my family wealth from the kind of screw up that happened with Sudie Parker during the Swiftsure. (by the way my replacement likely is not coverred). But Scott, a man I have sailed with, a man that now is retracting his center plank on his S2 7.9, a man who regardless of the ill he may speak of me can always rely on my friendship, could have lost his life owing to the ways of Sudie Parker.

Now again, she is just the symptom of the bigger problem, a pimple on something we call big boat racing. This TP52 Trader Fred business is part of that. Seahourse International is supporting the notion that an electrical fire, like the ripping of the main sheet, should result in the Captain withdrawing his vessel from any racing activity.

The evidence of the above, a letter penned by Sudie herself and posted on Sailing Anarchy has been removed. Except there is a copy on this thread with my comments.

Engage?
Reply With Quote
  #870  
Old 08-02-2005, 01:33 PM
Shife Shife is offline
Anarchist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 9 Posts: 148
Location: Michigan
Again when presented with fact, you respond with lies and fantasy. There is nothing here to "engage", only your demented fantasies.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incredible "Secrets of Yacht Design" website located... pkoken Sailboats 579 10-09-2005 08:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net