Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1636  
Old 02-12-2006, 11:56 PM
longliner45 longliner45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 505 Posts: 1,638
Location: Ohio
wow I like this tread!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #1637  
Old 02-13-2006, 02:56 AM
aitchem aitchem is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rep: 10 Posts: 73
Location: Aberdeen UK
Is there a way of marking this thread read instead of having to hit "last" and "back".?
I don't want the ***** here thinking I am reading this crap by creating another "hit" on the thread.!
__________________
Just........Swanning around
Reply With Quote
  #1638  
Old 02-13-2006, 03:45 PM
frankofile frankofile is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 91
Location: So Cal
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
The mac26x part in the TP52 conspiracy was significant on two levels. First, the water ballasted race trainers at 5000 active hulls competed directly with the notion of a TP26 race trainer, second they were proof that the LPS requirement of 128 in the TP53 box rules was hogwash.
******** Frank. You've made this and similar claims many times before - the MacCrap26 is somehow a big influence in sailboat racing, most great racers began on the MacCrap26, etc. Where are the numbers? Not one or two lucky wins, one of which was in a cruising class that allowed use of a motor as I recall, and not 5000 hulls out there collecting barnacles. Where are all the MacCrap26s racing, and who are the great sailors who came up through the MacCrap26 ranks? You claim to offer proof when asked so let's see it. (ha! I'm not holding my breath...)

You're a troll Frank. How do you back up your claim that Farr Intl went bankrupt? Nothing, just political nonsense. How do you back up your claim that US Sailing doesn't support the TP52 class? Nothing, just more political nonsense. Your supposed contributions to sailing? Dude, you are a pathetic buffoon. People laugh at you in spite of themselves. That is your sole contribution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
Frank L. Mighetto
Be My Valintine
Whatever the hell a Valintine is, I sincerely doubt that anyone will ever voluntarily agree to be yours.
Reply With Quote
  #1639  
Old 02-13-2006, 04:05 PM
frankofile frankofile is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 91
Location: So Cal
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
There is nothing as exhilerating as having someone aim at you and miss. You are aware that Sudie Parker's husband Little Man Hansen, contacted the state of washington and washington state patrol to have my internet access and job revoked are you not? Fellow, no one has done as much for this sport.
How is having to explain your unprofessional conduct to your employer a contribution to sailing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
BTW the Tripp 47 has burdened the Toliva Shoal race already. The S2 7.9 will not be racing owing to Sudie Parker's selection of a captain. One way to win is to take talent that would otherwize be competing against you.
You mean someone who owns an S2 7.9 is racing on someone else's Tripp 47??? People sail on each other's boats all the time. Hardly a conspiracy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
This is especially effective if it also takes out a movable and retractable foil vessel that has a chance of bettering your lubberly sailed vessel. This is the best recent example of the win-at-any-cost culture of corruption I continue to work against.
Haven't you been told before that the S2 7.9 keel retracts for trailering, not for racing? But there I go again, expecting you to pay attention and actually learn something.
Reply With Quote
  #1640  
Old 02-13-2006, 04:22 PM
Jim Hauser Jim Hauser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 35
Location: Tacoma
It is a conspiracy when nobody invites you out to sail with them all the while other club members sail with each other. Migghie had a chance to sail on the Tripp, she also had arranged a beer can race on the TP52, and a santa cruz 70 for frank. He's scared shitless of going faster than 4 knots or heeling more than 5 degrees.

Will we see Frankie at Toliva? I doubt it. His wife doesn't like him out playing past dinner time.
Reply With Quote
  #1641  
Old 02-13-2006, 06:33 PM
stevel stevel is offline
Lost at sea
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 15 Posts: 118
Location: Ventura, CA
Not just any McBoat, that's Frank

That picture is posted and discussed in this thread a few months ago. It is Frank getting in the way of a race, or as he likes to say, "being hunted".
Reply With Quote
  #1642  
Old 02-13-2006, 07:49 PM
sorenfdk sorenfdk is offline
Yacht Designer
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 394 Posts: 510
Location: Denmark
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
Good lord, man, I have rocked the Status Quo
Do You really think so?


Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
You may also be aware of the now famous rule 69 report I prepared for PHRF Northwest
No - should I be? Maybe someone in the Northwest cares (although I doubt it!), but why should the rest of the world?


Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
Certainly you know of the unhackable www.eskimo.com/~mighetto/murrelet.htm
Yes I do, and I think it's a good thing if it really is unhackable (although I doubt that too!), because it's so entertaining.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
You may not be aware of my role in extending rule 69 and proposed laws on Internet Bullying.
No, I'm not, and I can't see what proposed laws on internet bullying has got to do with sailing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
BTW the Tripp 47 has burdened the Toliva Shoal race already. The S2 7.9 will not be racing owing to Sudie Parker's selection of a captain. One way to win is to take talent that would otherwize be competing against you.
Did she put a gun to his head or did he go voluntarily?


Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
...a movable and retractable foil vessel...
If only You knew what You were talking about...


Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
As Secretary of South Sound Sailing Society, I got the job done.
If You were so fantastic, why aren't You secretary any more?


And, finally:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
ask for evidence and so it will be given
You still owe us evidence concerning the bankruptcy of Farr International.
__________________
Best regards,

Søren Flening

NOTE: This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and are in no way to be considered flaws or defects.
Reply With Quote
  #1643  
Old 02-14-2006, 09:06 AM
mighetto's Avatar
mighetto mighetto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: -6 Posts: 676
Location: water world
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeevonk
After my previous somewhat careless post i did some research on the (name shall not be mentioned) subject.

The best foundings of my conclusion (which i shall not mention) were found here:

http://www.sailinganarchy.com/forums...topic=8070&hl=

Some quotes:

"See! As you delete posts you actually start to become smarter..."
"I have purged myself. It truly is a great feeling."
"Hilarious hitting the refresh and watching the posts go down."



This thread is mostly about deleting and the problems involved.
Deleting this piece of internet history would be a shame. I propose to found a site where all posts are collected, and new post redirected to. The non sailing internet community deserves a chance to be part of this.
Hey, our faith precludes the making of such images.

The Mac26x comes with a Coleman ice chest and the idea is that you cart that back and forth from boat to home. Heck that's work. If its on the boat it stays there. I am not carting it back - no way. I don't want it to go bad so hence the thermal. If you remove the liner for the ice chest storage compartment, the fit is near perfect on the Mac26x. Many Mac26x owners remove the ice chest from its designed place under the aft dinette seat and use this for storage. The ice chest storage compartment is the only finished compartment on the vessel and the ice chest itself can be possitioned as they are on the Mac26m or better yet under the table. Mac26x pocket cruisers originally were fitted out with Coleman ice chests by the factory. Many boaters do not know that Coleman (the outdoor equipment firm) purchased Hobie Cat Company (at the time a public company) in the 1970s with Hobie Alter becoming a consultant to Coleman. Since the only finished storage compartment on an X houses the ice chest, Coleman was honored by - if not connected to - MacGregor Yachts, prior to the introduction of the M (which is not fitted out with a chest by the factory). Perhaps today's camping image for Coleman is not in keeping with the M's big boat interior which often includes a TV/DVD system. In anycase the Mac26x is tied to the Hobie Cat beach boats through its ice chest and also through Hobie Cat athletes. Remember that MacGregor produced cruising cats for many years. Many owners (not me) beach Mac26x cruisers like a catamaran. I have listened to many versions of a story involving Hobie Cat athletes sailing a Mac26x at 17 MPH in Mexican or San Franciscan waters and one of these days I will bump into a first hand witness, assuming the story is true. The story usually involves a fleet of Hobie Cats with a Mac26x serving as mother ship. The Cats take off and those left on the mother ship take chase and achieve 17MPH under sail. Most assume the athletes on the mother ship hiked out and sailed unballasted. However, having achieved 12 and 13 MPH on several occasions now fully ballasted - with crew sitting inside the life lines - I doubt the X was unballasted or rigged so that hiking out could be supported. One captain has reported to Sailnet of reaching 17 MPH by starting off fully ballasted and dropping the ballast after stabilizing the boat on a downwind point of sail. Even if the Hobie-cat athelete-crewed Mac26x story is fable, pocket rocket is a valid descriptor for the vessel. Bottom line - on an X there should be some kind of Coleman equipment aboard just for tradition.

Is the image commercially available. I would like copies.

Frank L. Mighetto
glad to see things lighten up.
SSSS meeting tonight
All welcome

Voyages to Windward
West Side of Vancouver Island
Reply With Quote
  #1644  
Old 02-14-2006, 12:56 PM
frankofile frankofile is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 91
Location: So Cal
Quote:
Originally Posted by mighetto
glad to see things lighten up.
Why? So you don't have to provide "evidence" for any of the questions you were asked yesterday? What a horse's ass you are.
Reply With Quote
  #1645  
Old 02-14-2006, 01:03 PM
stevel stevel is offline
Lost at sea
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 15 Posts: 118
Location: Ventura, CA
Hey! Keep It Civil. Don't Start Insulting Horses Here.
Reply With Quote
  #1646  
Old 02-14-2006, 03:18 PM
frankofile frankofile is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 91
Location: So Cal
Got a little carried away. My apologies to horses and horse lovers.
Reply With Quote
  #1647  
Old 02-14-2006, 04:44 PM
Skippy Skippy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 12 Posts: 568
Location: cornfields
stevel: Hey! Keep It Civil. Don't Start Insulting Horses Here.
He's only insulting the ass.
__________________
Sailing is not a motor sport.
Reply With Quote
  #1648  
Old 02-15-2006, 12:08 AM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 566 Posts: 602
Location: australia
Ok I’ve read and read but nobody has ask or posed the thought for discussion
1 Are movable/removable ballasted boats inherently unseaworthy?
2 The shifting of blame from operator error to design error /flaw by (for what ever purpose) third parties. This should be up for serious discussion. As this has an effect on all designers and builders
Reply With Quote
  #1649  
Old 02-15-2006, 10:55 AM
Shife Shife is offline
Anarchist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 9 Posts: 148
Location: Michigan
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhnautika
Ok I’ve read and read but nobody has ask or posed the thought for discussion
1 Are movable/removable ballasted boats inherently unseaworthy?
2 The shifting of blame from operator error to design error /flaw by (for what ever purpose) third parties. This should be up for serious discussion. As this has an effect on all designers and builders
You're not going to find any serious discussion in this thread. Just fantasy and make-believe, countered with logic and fact, that goes completely ignored.
Reply With Quote
  #1650  
Old 02-15-2006, 04:15 PM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 566 Posts: 602
Location: australia
Yeah but if you keeping driving into the mud your going to get bogged. May be its time to get out and push in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incredible "Secrets of Yacht Design" website located... pkoken Sailboats 579 10-09-2005 08:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2013 Boat Design Net