Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Wiki (beta)  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors  |  Sitemap

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-27-2005, 04:04 PM
Doug Lord
 
Posts: n/a
update

Broken battens in the main-still making good speed and will still win(I hope) and in record time!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-27-2005, 04:17 PM
Doug Lord
 
Posts: n/a
Wild Oats(CBTF) WINS!!!!-Record time!

Fantastic! Bob Oately who was the first owner to use CBTF on a Grand Prix yacht and predicted CBTF would revolutionize sailing just made his prediction of 5 or so years ago come true.
Congratulations to Mark Richards and crew for a great milestone! CBTF Rules!
----------------
edit: This means that CBTF has now broken the record in the Transpac,SH and the Bermuda race!

Last edited by Doug Lord : 12-27-2005 at 07:18 PM. Reason: to add info
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-27-2005, 09:30 PM
nevd nevd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 10 Posts: 99
Location: Australia
Wild Oats 11 has broken race record

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorsail
Should be there tomorrow morning I think-fast pace but probably just under a record ..
Congratulations to all those people and organisations who insist on living on the "cutting edge" of technology.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-27-2005, 09:33 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
will this record have an asterisk next to it, just like Nokia's did? (waterballast)
I dont have any problems with the motor running to power the keel, but the powered winches is a bit excessive. Congrats to Wild Oats for a superbly sailed race(minus the mainsail incident).
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-28-2005, 11:13 AM
D'ARTOIS D'ARTOIS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 83 Posts: 1,068
Location: The Netherlands
Maybe I am a bit of a purist........

I don't blame the sailors - they did an exellent job;

I don't blame the designers - engineers - they did what was expected from them;

The introduction of "Line Honours" is disqualifying the or any race - the biggest boats will (almost) always win; therefore: who is the overall winner of the S-H?

To me, the Sydney - Hobart was always the purest of the purest. Like the Grand National in Steeple Chasing, or Pardubice.

Now a bunch of motorised sailing yachts has taken over the leading edge due to the heavy sponsoring.

Sports sponsoring = sports spoiling!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-28-2005, 03:33 PM
Skippy Skippy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 12 Posts: 568
Location: cornfields
I'm with D'Artois. This may belong on another thread, but if you really want to race canters, there should be a separate "power-assisted" category. You don't have to be a purist, just acknowledge that there IS an engine on your boat, it IS running, and your boat would NOT function without it. To say that your powered-keel, powered-winch, multimillion-dollar boat set a new "sailing" record doesn't do justice to the guys who went out there in the past with much less equipment. The purists could have a class that bans more conventional equipment, but you can still have in-between classes that allow, for example, electronic navigation and/or an auxiliary. That way, the big cats can fight their financial/technological arms race, and the little mice can do some real sailing!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-28-2005, 04:48 PM
D'ARTOIS D'ARTOIS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 83 Posts: 1,068
Location: The Netherlands
Applaudite, applaudite......I am not such a purist that I ban navionics and the like - but the remaining of your statement fully represents my feelings Skippy; even in SA a large number of members is against the canting keel business.
Saw that Wild Oats is all over winner too, and rumour is going that in the last minute Wild Oates broke the keel too and that they just barely won the S-H.
If Alfa Romeo had followed Wild Oates instead of taking another course, who knows who may have won?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-28-2005, 05:00 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
Skandia had her problems also. apparently they filled the engine with water and had to disassemble it. Good thing they were not near the coast.
I am not against the engine for running the keel, as in a few years they will not need the engine running full time to cant the thing. I do believe powered winches should be banned, because the crew will not be as fatigued as other crews, and have a physical advantage plus a faster boat. The J-Class boats were sailed with coffee grinders, why should these boats be different?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-28-2005, 05:23 PM
tamkvaitis tamkvaitis is offline
sailor/amateur designer
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 124
Location: lithuania
where can I found information about sidney-hobart race?
__________________
Lithuania
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-28-2005, 05:26 PM
Doug Lord
 
Posts: n/a
CBTF wins!

"Just barely won the SH" ! what a load of hogwash! The boat cleaned the clocks of the whole fleet for line honors and overall in record time. Alfa also broke the record(I think). CBTF broke the record!!
I would never suggest you couldn't race your leadbelly and you shouldn't have the incredible presumption to say that these magnificent SAILBOATS shouldn't be allowed to race.
If Wild Oats DIDN"T have some trouble I would be surprised! It was her FIRST major ocean race for gods sake! Canting keels and particularly CBTF have a long and mostly safe record-in fact no CBTF boat has ever had a design problen with the keel to my knowledge. There were huge ,serious problems with fin keels when they were first introduced but the designers learned as they will with canting keels.
You talk in absurd doubletalk when you say "power assisted" or motor sailers" as if the engine was providing motive power which it most
certainly isn't. It's pitiful that in your dislike for the new technology you have to use such silly tags for some of the most magnificent sailing machines ever to touch water. It's pitiful that you feel the need to denigrate the accomplishment of a huge team of dedicated people from Bill Burns,Alberto Calderon, Charles Robinson,Matt Brown and the other guys at CBTFco, to Jim Pugh and John Reichel at Reichel-Pugh, the builders at McConnaghy's and the crew on the boat.Some of these people have worked for over 25 years to achieve this goal and to try to put down the accomplishments of such a team using those ridiculous tags is disgracefull!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-28-2005, 05:29 PM
Chris Ostlind Chris Ostlind is offline
Mike Nelson Protege
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rep: 413 Posts: 1,531
Location: Two Harbors, Catalina
Link to S/H results

Here: http://rolexsydneyhobart.com//default.asp?key=521
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-28-2005, 05:40 PM
Chris Ostlind Chris Ostlind is offline
Mike Nelson Protege
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rep: 413 Posts: 1,531
Location: Two Harbors, Catalina
Hi Doug,

Would you be pissed if the next S/H were won by boats with turbine assist for all the functional elements of the boat's operation as well as light wind "traction enhancements" ? (to be determined by some fluctuating comittee of obtuse overseers)

This same sort of discussion took place in the Indy 500 some thousands of years ago when the Andy Granatelli turbine powered car LAPPED the field nearly twice before expiring due to a $6 ball bearing placement... with the finish in sight. The subsequent discussions banned turbine cars from the field forever.

Why not full-tilt ORMA 60 multihulls that woud lay waste to anything the mono's could ever do credibly? (and that includes all foil equipped mono's due to the submerged crap in the water) If they have really big balls there won't be any hassle for multihullers to enter this race. The organizers just have to sack-up and let it roll as it may.

This record should be asterisked as appropriate to the style of boat as entered.

End Rant... Out

Chris Ostlind
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-28-2005, 06:10 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
Where are people coming up with this stuff about Wild Oat's keel having problems? It was at full cant in the photos of her at the finish. It sure doesnt look like she was having keel problems, as she was doing 14 knots under a 110%(ish) jib.

Would people object to the keel being canted off batteries? It certainly is possible. You would only need to run the engine to recharge the batteries, which they do on nearly all the boats in the race to provide for the electronics.


They should also change the ratings on the canting keel boats, because they tend to be rated unfairly in regards to the smaller boats. They should rate them as a bigger boat, because they are capable of speeds that a bigger boat would do. So if you have a 98' supermaxi, it would rate as a 120 footer. Or something like that. Just like Wild Oats 66' should be rated as a 90(ish) footer, because thats how fast she is.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-28-2005, 06:14 PM
Chris Ostlind Chris Ostlind is offline
Mike Nelson Protege
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rep: 413 Posts: 1,531
Location: Two Harbors, Catalina
"Would people object to the keel being canted off batteries? It certainly is possible. You would only need to run the engine to recharge the batteries, which they do on nearly all the boats in the race to provide for the electronics."

No, no objection to the full-on battery exception, but the design would then have to allow for the distribution of battery ballast.

"They should also change the ratings on the canting keel boats, because they tend to be rated unfairly in regards to the smaller boats. They should rate them as a bigger boat, because they are capable of speeds that a bigger boat would do. So if you have a 98' supermaxi, it would rate as a 120 footer. Or something like that. Just like Wild Oats 66' should be rated as a 90(ish) footer, because thats how fast she is."

And now you've hit the nail on the head.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-28-2005, 06:21 PM
Doug Lord
 
Posts: n/a
Multihulls yes!

Chris, I think multies should be allowed and it's a black mark against the SH that they aren't. And I don't care how they generate onboard power just so long as multihulls, canting keels and hydrofoils are allowed....
2, the ED on SA started the keel rumor this morning by mentioning that he thought Adrianne Callahan had mentioned something about it after getting off the boat. But I haven't seen any more to back that up and I seriously doubt it.
The rating systems all take canting keels into account; the Schock 40 rating is particularly onerous from what I hear..
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CBTF technical papers Flo Sailboats 3 11-04-2005 04:58 PM
CBTF smashes Transpac record/ Waterballast dead? Doug Lord Sailboats 5 07-26-2005 07:14 AM
CBTF(Canting Ballast Twin Foil) Doug Lord Sailboats 300 07-25-2005 09:35 PM
-CBTF and VARA- Doug Lord Sailboats 25 06-15-2005 09:54 AM
Sydney Hobart Karsten Sailboats 75 02-16-2005 03:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin 3 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2009 Boat Design Net