Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-21-2006, 02:50 PM
TimClark TimClark is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 31 Posts: 110
Location: Fairfield County, CT
As others have stated, the bow looks a little fat. Also, I think that a wheel would be the way to go for a couple reasons. 1. Less space is being taken up
2. Boarding the boat from the rear would be easier because of the lack of clutter in the stern 3. Many cruisers prefer a wheel because of it's ability to easily hook up and autopilot to it

P.S.-What design program did you use for the boat?

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-21-2006, 04:17 PM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 499 Posts: 489
Location: australia
If you convert from tiller to wheel on this boat you will have to take the step/foot well out of the cockpit sole as the boom would be to close to the head of the helmsman’s standing at the wheel as it is. This would also enable a longer bench seat, which you could also lay out on.
The companionway hatch is a little small for a cruising boat. There is only 1.24 metres (4ft) between the edge of the first step and the inside edge of the open hatch.
For the rig have you considered swept spreaders (no back stay) and self-tacking jib? Makes for easy sailing.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-21-2006, 04:26 PM
solrac solrac is offline
100% sudaca
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 42 Posts: 138
Location: 34'54"35"47S - 56'07"48"98W
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimClark
As others have stated, the bow looks a little fat. Also, I think that a wheel would be the way to go for a couple reasons. 1. Less space is being taken up
2. Boarding the boat from the rear would be easier because of the lack of clutter in the stern 3. Many cruisers prefer a wheel because of it's ability to easily hook up and autopilot to it

P.S.-What design program did you use for the boat?

Tim
As I stated on first posts, I'm just a naval aficionado, as an architect, I normally use Autocad, so it was preformed on it. The "fat lady" aspect was intentional, thinking that between comfort & speed, my option was comfort.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhnautika
If you convert from tiller to wheel on this boat you will have to take the step/foot well out of the cockpit sole as the boom would be to close to the head of the helmsman’s standing at the wheel as it is. This would also enable a longer bench seat, which you could also lay out on.
The companionway hatch is a little small for a cruising boat. There is only 1.24 metres (4ft) between the edge of the first step and the inside edge of the open hatch. For the rig have you considered swept spreaders (no back stay) and self-tacking jib? Makes for easy sailng.
thanks for the advice, I've considered the spreaders option, but it depends on the availability & kind of mast at the moment of acquiring it. (don't forget such a mast system is as unavailable here in Uruguay as a green monkey with 2 tails) The only option is to import it it from USA or Europe or "adapt" an used model from another sailboat bringing it from Argentina or Brazil
Same concern about the tiler against wheel, tiler can be a wooden piece & some hardware, wheel must be imported or "invented"

As an example, there is only one operative CNC mill in the country, you must ask for it with 3 months pre advice.
another, there are just 2 naval suppliers in the country, mostly specialized in Optimist/Laser & some J24 spare parts, don't ask any weird part cause they'll laugh at your face...
Making a boat here feels alike Robinson Crusoe in his lonely island....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-21-2006, 06:03 PM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 499 Posts: 489
Location: australia
Solrac your road to building this boat will in deed be hard which bring me to the question of what material you plan to build with as the displacement looks like about 3000 kg.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-22-2006, 04:21 PM
solrac solrac is offline
100% sudaca
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 42 Posts: 138
Location: 34'54"35"47S - 56'07"48"98W
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhnautika
Solrac your road to building this boat will in deed be hard which bring me to the question of what material you plan to build with as the displacement looks like about 3000 kg.
As calculated, the displacement is a bit higher, about 3500/3700kg.
I was thinking on a plywood structure (CNC cutted) reinforced with fiberglass (a kind of a sandwich) & a similar laminated multilayered hull (plywood/fiberglass) I think I can achieve enough strenght & low weight.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-22-2006, 04:51 PM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
Will you contact a designer or nav arch for help on the final hull shape and then do the interior yourself?
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-22-2006, 05:08 PM
solrac solrac is offline
100% sudaca
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 42 Posts: 138
Location: 34'54"35"47S - 56'07"48"98W
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raggi_Thor
Will you contact a designer or nav arch for help on the final hull shape and then do the interior yourself?
I already did. it's mandatory here registering any sailboat with a Nav.Arch signature..
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-22-2006, 05:54 PM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 499 Posts: 489
Location: australia
Solrac at that displacement it seems ok. I would go a little higher (nobody complains if the boat comes out lighter).
As for supplies, sometimes it pays not to think boat!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-23-2006, 03:41 PM
solrac solrac is offline
100% sudaca
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 42 Posts: 138
Location: 34'54"35"47S - 56'07"48"98W
as stated, by calculations done (I'm not a specialist in this matter, but..)
Displacement about 3.5m3
LOA 10.00m LWL 8.50 BEAM 3.30
keel about 1300kg (depending on final weight of hull) but draft no more than 1.70m (no more water at port here), even thinking about a semi mobile keel, discarded it because it's a nightmare sailing with it in open waters
Mast (estimated by now, depending on availability at the moment) 14.00/15.00m
Think of an internal power about 30/40hp
by the way, seen on another post about tandem keels (Tandem? Keel on Bavaria) would it make any sense or it's only marketing technique?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-23-2006, 04:23 PM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 499 Posts: 489
Location: australia
I would keep it simple, the time and money to design and fabricate that type of keel can be better spent.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-24-2006, 06:37 AM
solrac solrac is offline
100% sudaca
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 42 Posts: 138
Location: 34'54"35"47S - 56'07"48"98W
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhnautika
I would keep it simple, the time and money to design and fabricate that type of keel can be better spent.
ok, thanks for the advice, let's be traditional....
I suspicted from the beginning, that type of keel can't equal stab force than a traditional, as the mass distribution implies less distance must have a lot bigger weight... although, the only pro I've seen: less draft
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-24-2006, 05:07 PM
bhnautika bhnautika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 499 Posts: 489
Location: australia
Solrac since you have autocad it maybe worth your while to 3d model the interior as it would give you a feeling for the space and speed up the construction side a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-26-2006, 02:13 PM
terhohalme's Avatar
terhohalme terhohalme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Rep: 478 Posts: 484
Location: Kotka, Finland
Sorry, been on holyday trip last week.

I meant that the mesh surface is "bumpy", not the design. LWL/BWL about from 3 to 3.5 and half angle of waterline < 20 degrees is quite reasonable for a cruiser.

Terho
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-26-2006, 04:46 PM
jedclampit jedclampit is offline
Junior Asparagus
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 12 Posts: 69
Location: Hollywood, Florida
In the same boat...

Slorac,

I'm in the same boat...an engineer looking to build a custom sailboat with the same characteristics. If you like fat with a big fridge, look at the Bruce Robert Designs…You won’t win any races, but you won’t spill your beer either.

http://www.bruceroberts.com/public/HTML/plans1.htm
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-26-2006, 08:42 PM
solrac solrac is offline
100% sudaca
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Rep: 42 Posts: 138
Location: 34'54"35"47S - 56'07"48"98W
Guys, finished the interior design, attaching the drafts.
greetings.
Attached Files
File Type: dwg ims33.dwg (299.9 KB, 165 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminun Sailboat Design SamAlec Metal Boat Building 1 08-04-2004 10:15 AM
New sailboat design rjm Sailboats 3 10-10-2003 11:39 PM
sailboat design books? Guest Boat Design 9 08-25-2003 10:57 PM
Pilothouse Sailboat Design Guest Boat Design 0 06-13-2003 11:03 PM
Basics of Sailboat design flyingdutchmen Boat Design 2 10-22-2002 08:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net