Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #151  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:05 PM
Nels Tomlinson Nels Tomlinson is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 10 Posts: 30
Location: Juneau, Alaska
Quote:
Originally Posted by Windvang View Post
The attached example is a 40' Kvase I reengineered from steel into foam composite. The hull was build in kevlar in order to get the same strength as the steel. Originally 15 ton, now 13 ton ...
So Windvang, I'm curious. You were able to shave off two tons at the same strength by going from steel to kevlar. What did that do to the cost of the hull? Kevlar/foam composite is much lighter per unit strength than steel, but it also costs way, Way, WAY more per pound than steel, so unless you saved a lot on labor, I'd expect the cost went up?

Obviously, there is no intrinsic value to a heavy hull; if your hull is strong enough but too light, you can always stuff in some more gear and supplies. Obviously, the lighter hull is going to be objectively better, but I'm wondering about the cost benefit ratio.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 12-21-2006, 11:05 AM
Dyflin Dyflin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rep: 16 Posts: 1
Location: Ireland
A fascinating thread, thank you for all the input.

I wonder if I could suggest some more boats for discussion.

Elizabethan 30

and here

Also the Vertue 2

Two more "modern" designs from well known manufacturers include worth considering are

Westerly Merlin

Moody 28


Thanks again and keep up the great work

Last edited by Dyflin : 12-22-2006 at 02:46 AM. Reason: Updating links
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 12-21-2006, 11:25 AM
yipster's Avatar
yipster yipster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 1083 Posts: 3,337
Location: netherlands
hi Dyflin, ok nice boats and welcome aboard but use the upload (below text) option becouse we cant look into your HD
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 12-28-2006, 11:55 PM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2069 Posts: 3,574
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyflin View Post
A fascinating thread, thank you for all the input.

I wonder if I could suggest some more boats for discussion.

Elizabethan 30

and here

Also the Vertue 2

Two more "modern" designs from well known manufacturers include worth considering are

Westerly Merlin

Moody 28


Thanks again and keep up the great work
Nice post Dyflin, thanks for the input on those very nice boats. Somewhat lazy these days, and also experiencing a home computer problem, I'll work on her numbers as soon as possible.
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:06 PM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2069 Posts: 3,574
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
Also here: Any new design lately, deserving to be brought here?

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 12-14-2007, 01:46 PM
mcm mcm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 26 Posts: 65
Location: Port Townsend, Wa., USA
Has anyone on this thread seen any building plans for a 26'-28', STEEL, blue-water, ocean-cruising, shoal-draft, centerboard, possessing full 180 degrees self-righting?
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 12-15-2007, 01:18 AM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2069 Posts: 3,574
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
It's better late than never. Here some numbers for the Elizabethan 39, Vertue 28, Westerly Merlin and Moody 32. Inputs as per Dyflin posted pages)
(asuming Bwl as 0.9*Bmax)

VERTUE II
Length/Beam Ratio L/B = 2,92 (2*LWL + LH) / (3*Bmax)
Lwl/Bwl Ratio Lwl/Bwl = 3,05
Length/Draught Ratio Lh/T = 5,7
Beam/Draught Ratio Bmax/T = 1,74
Ballast/Disp Ratio W/Disp = 0,48
Displacement/Length Ratio D/L = 418,71
Sail Area/Disp. Ratio SA/D = 13,43
Hull speed HSPD = 6,20 Kn
Velocity Ratio VR = 1,03
Capsize Safety Factor CSF = 1,49
Motion Comfort Ratio MCR = 40,38
Heft Ratio HF = 1,84
Roll Period T = 4,44 Sec
Roll Acceleration Acc = 0,03 G's
Stability Index SI = 1,86
Angle of Vanishing Stability AVS = 148 º


ELIZABETHAN 30
Length/Beam Ratio L/B = 2,79
Lwl/Bwl Ratio Lwl/Bwl = 2,88
Length/Draught Ratio Lh/T = 5,91
Beam/Draught Ratio Bmax/T = 1,86
Ballast/Disp Ratio W/Disp = 0,5
Displacement/Length Ratio D/L = 231,12
Sail Area/Disp. Ratio SA/D = 17,14
Hull speed HSPD = 6,57 Kn
Velocity Ratio VR = 1,12
Capsize Safety Factor CSF = 1,92
Motion Comfort Ratio MCR = 22,14
Heft Ratio HF = 0,89
Roll Period T = 2,61 Sec
Roll Acceleration Acc = 0,1 G's
Stability Index SI = 0,93
Angle of Vanishing Stability AVS = 129 º

WESTERLY MERLIN 28 (Twin)
Length/Beam Ratio L/B = 2,55
Lwl/Bwl Ratio Lwl/Bwl = 2,65
Length/Draught Ratio Lh/T = 8,57
Beam/Draught Ratio Bmax/T = 2,96
Ballast/Disp Ratio W/Disp = 0,43
Displacement/Length Ratio D/L = 261,89
Sail Area/Disp. Ratio SA/D = 13,69
Hull speed HSPD = 6,51 Kn
Velocity Ratio VR = 1,04
Capsize Safety Factor CSF = 2,01
Motion Comfort Ratio MCR = 22,17
Heft Ratio HF = 0,85
Roll Period T = 2,53 Sec
Roll Acceleration Acc = 0,12 G's
Stability Index SI = 0,84
Angle of Vanishing Stability AVS = 121 º


MOODY 28 (Fin)
Length/Beam Ratio L/B = 2,47
Lwl/Bwl Ratio Lwl/Bwl = 2,59
Length/Draught Ratio Lh/T = 5,51
Beam/Draught Ratio Bmax/T = 2,01
Ballast/Disp Ratio W/Disp = 0,38
Displacement/Length Ratio D/L = 230,48
Sail Area/Disp. Ratio SA/D = 15,25
Hull speed HSPD = 6,47 Kn
Velocity Ratio VR = 1,1
Capsize Safety Factor CSF = 2,14
Motion Comfort Ratio MCR = 19,02
Heft Ratio HF = 0,74
Roll Period T = 2,18 Sec
Roll Acceleration Acc = 0,16 G's
Stability Index SI = 0,71
Angle of Vanishing Stability AVS = 124 º
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 12-15-2007, 02:31 AM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
Hmm, I would guess that a long roll period like 4,44 seconds is good for comfort? Can you repeat what else goes into the comfort ratio?
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 12-16-2007, 04:49 PM
Guillermo's Avatar
Guillermo Guillermo is offline
Ingeniero Naval
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep: 2069 Posts: 3,574
Location: Pontevedra, Spain
From Ted Brewer (http://www.tedbrewer.com/yachtdesign.html)

"COMFORT RATIO (CR): This is a ratio that I dreamed up, tongue-in-cheek, as a measure of motion comfort but it has been widely accepted and, indeed, does provide a reasonable comparison between yachts of similar type. It is based on the fact that the faster the motion the more upsetting it is to the average person. Given a wave of X height, the speed of the upward motion depends on the displacement of the yacht and the amount of waterline area that is acted upon. Greater displacement, or lesser WL area, gives a slower motion and more comfort for any given sea state.

Beam does enter into it as as wider beam increases stability, increases WL area, and generates a faster reaction. The formula takes into account the displacement, the WL area, and adds a beam factor. The intention is to provide a means to compare the motion comfort of vessels of similar type and size, not to compare that of a Lightning class sloop with that of a husky 50 foot ketch.

The CR is : Displacement in pounds/ (.65 x (.7 LWL + .3 LOA) x B^1.333). Ratios will vary from 5.0 for a light daysailer to the high 60s for a super heavy vessel, such as a Colin Archer ketch. Moderate and successful ocean cruisers, such as the Valiant 40 and Whitby 42, will fall into the low-middle 30s range.

Do consider, though, that a sailing yacht heeled by a good breeze will have a much steadier motion than one bobbing up and down in light airs on left over swells from yesterday's blow; also that the typical summertime coastal cruiser will rarely encounter the wind and seas that an ocean going yacht will meet. Nor will one human stomach keep down what another stomach will handle with relish, or with mustard and pickles for that matter! It is all relative."

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 12-16-2007, 06:02 PM
yipster's Avatar
yipster yipster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 1083 Posts: 3,337
Location: netherlands
a us naval report mentioned a boat motion of 10 deg can set mariners capacitys back by 50%
interestingly a 5% motion gave 110% capability ( was used in a multihull argument )
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
molding replacement pocket liners Dark57 Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 4 02-22-2006 12:20 PM
The plywood pocket rocket tlopes Boatbuilding 1 09-01-2004 05:17 AM
cruising boats made of carbon fibre and epoxy resin, +? Marie Boat Design 11 04-11-2004 09:58 PM
Pets on board cruising boats tdamico Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 5 10-20-2003 10:43 PM
Pocket Cruiser qadeer Boatbuilding 1 07-08-2002 04:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net