Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Wiki (beta)  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors  |  Sitemap

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-18-2009, 05:56 PM
longfellow longfellow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Rep: 17 Posts: 28
Location: upstate NY
Opinions on alternate wood for daysailer keel

Eighteen foot open daysailer, centerboard, bent oak frames (.75in x .75in), carvel planked (.625 in thick) hull, knockabout rig of approx 200 square feet. Diaplacement will be close to 1,200 lbs. (A very close copy of an alden O-Boat but of a different architect's design). I would like to use longleaf pine in place of the white oak keel. The plank's finished cross-section is 1.625 in by 5.50 inches. It has a fair amount of camber and needs to be sixteen feet long. It widens naturally to accept the slot for the centerboard and tapers to about two inches at both ends.
I am proposing the swap in YP but intend to duplicate the strength in pine by bumping up the moment of inertia of the existing cross section so that bending stress, once calculated, ends up being about equal to that with oak. I am assuming that using bending stresses to find the new cross section in yellow pine, is better than using either sheer or torsional.
Comments are very much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-20-2009, 12:38 AM
Petros Petros is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 137 Posts: 321
Location: Arlington, WA-USA
That is a reasonable approach, probably more than most would do. Also watch the cross gain compression strength at places like the mast step, you might want to spread the load out to prevent crushing the grain in high compression areas.

What are the strength properties of the pine vs. oak (do you have them handy?).

Also consider that white oak has much higher density than pine, so your empty weight might be less, which might affect stablity unless you compensate with ballast.

I make substitutions of materials all the time on the smaller boats I build, and if it worries me I do what you are proposing, match size to the critical strength using the new material specs. As an engineer I think most stock plans overkill the strength (making them heavy), that is they are very conservative to accommodate a lot of abuse and poor workmanship. I suspect you will be fine, I personally would not hesitate to do just what you are doing.

Have a good time building it and do not fret over your materials substitutions.

good luck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2009, 07:25 AM
longfellow longfellow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Rep: 17 Posts: 28
Location: upstate NY
Thanks very much Petros.
I was surprised to find that longleaf actually has greater bending strength than white oak. Its modulus (E) is also greater. It does however have less compressive strength normal to the grain so your suggestion to beef up the mast step and distribute the load more, is dead on. I can take care of that. I was nearly ready to break down the entire lofting and molds which are all complete and ready for the keel, stem, transom and then ribbanding but your input has lifted quite a burden and renewed my enthusiasm for continuing.
Thanks again,
Ed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-23-2009, 01:40 PM
Petros Petros is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Rep: 137 Posts: 321
Location: Arlington, WA-USA
Another consideration occurred to me, you should also check fastener holding strength (usually listed as dowel bearing strength). For most fastener locations there should not be an issue because there are not loaded to their capacity. Bbut in critically loaded areas you might want to add a few more fasteners, or go up in sized, if there is much difference in the dowel bearing strength.

If the difference is less than 10-15% you are probably fine, but if over that better up the number of fasteners to compensate. Critical locations would be chain plates, fore stay, rudder mounts, keel attachment, rowlocks (if so equipped). and any and all fasteners in the prow area and keel.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-23-2009, 02:41 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 1133 Posts: 4,714
Location: Riccelli Restorations - Eustis, FL
Most of the highly loaded fasteners will likely be through bolted and a non-issue.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-24-2009, 05:21 AM
gonzo's Avatar
gonzo gonzo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Rep: 494 Posts: 3,842
Location: Temporarily in London
If it is true YP then it should be OK. They sell a lot of pines as YP that are not the same quality
__________________
Gonzo
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lead vs. Wood Keel fascia Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 1 01-02-2009 03:16 AM
Wood to use replacing keel stringer painter Materials 11 07-09-2007 08:05 PM
Opinions on this newbie amateur daysailer Murdock Boat Design 39 12-04-2006 12:12 PM
canting keel opinions nemo Boat Design 22 09-02-2005 09:33 AM
HELP ! Canting keel for 28ft performance daysailer Guest Jan Boat Design 10 12-03-2003 12:07 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin 3 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2009 Boat Design Net