Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:43 PM
Perm Stress's Avatar
Perm Stress Perm Stress is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 323 Posts: 523
Location: Lithuania
Nothing will beat moderate roach main with proper slab reefing system with luff sliders and full length battens + good lazy jacks for easy of use, reliability, and control if something goes wrong.
From my experience, in-boom sail is somewhere in between of in-mast and conventional in terms of efficiency; for so long as everything is OK, I did not find much problems of handling either of them even on 50-footers. When something DOES go wrong, My order of preference would be conventional with sliders, conventional with luff tape, in-boom, in-mast.
As previously noted, uncontrolled in-boom sail on deck is BIG problem; hovewer, uncontrolled sail aloft is certainly BIGGER. And if something goes wrong with in-mast partly rolled... the only way to get rid of it will be someone with good knife on the halyard; and new sail afterward.
As to "overrated" roach on cruising boat: negative roach of in-mast vs positive roach of in-boom or normal easily could be ~15...20% of sail area on same length spars.
I not even talk about efficiency from the beam reach up -the closer to wind you go, the more dramatic is the difference in pointing, ease of helming and consistent speed.
Unless in-mast has rather long vertical battens, the profile shape is nothing to speak about.
Very important and often not mentioned point is the mainsail chord to mast diameter ratio. As a rule of thumb, a strip along the mast ~1-2 mast diameters wide could be considered as "lost" for forward drive. With negative roach, this strip make dramatically bigger proportion of mainsail area.
Just my 3 cents.
__________________
All the stresses in my designs are 95% of permissible.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-01-2011, 02:04 PM
mark775
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't think he heard you Lubber. You tried.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-03-2011, 03:30 PM
BATAAN's Avatar
BATAAN BATAAN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rep: 1090 Posts: 1,502
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by michael pierzga View Post
In boom furling is a pain in the ass. Ive sailed a few hundred thousand miles with the stuff and wouldn't touch it for my own boat. Torn luff tapes and blown out battens cost big money to repair and will constantly plague you. . When the sail is rolled you cant perform simple maitence like new tell tales or batten tension, the sail gets wet on the mandrel and molds or corrodes the mandrel, leech lines are difficult to arrange and use...........................

In mast is more reliable and easier to use.

Both rely on buttons and electro gizmos to work.

Nothing wrong with a well thought out conventional slab reefing system on a small boat.

If I had money to waste on electro gizmos it would be a pair of electric winch's. They are very versatile..lifting a man aloft...hauling kedge anchors, lifting tenders, sheeting sails, rolling the genoa, hoisting sails..........


Oh and Id say that swan 36 is stuck in Antigua...subtract 15 grand right away. Also look for yacht stuck in Hawaii.


Luff tape damage at radar height
Also yacht stuck in any far downwind port. Both sides of Panama and Australia/New Zealand come to mind. People get far away from home, realize it's upwind to go back, and leave the boat. Eventually it gets sold cheap.
These are often fully-equipped, half-way through their dream cruise vessels of all types, ultra-modern expensive or tarred antique, but seaworthy enough to get this far.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-09-2011, 02:59 PM
Crag Cay Crag Cay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 572 Posts: 635
Location: UK
The original question was from someone considering a 32 or 33 foot boat. All the models he said were being considered were lightweight, everyday boats. One of the 'givens' was that they wanted to have some form of mainsail furling and were enquiring as to the merits of either in-mast or in-boom. My comments were addressed to purely this issue. However I will reply to some of the other points.


Full battened full roach leach mainsails are nice but overrated on a cruising boat.
We're not talking about 'fat head' sails here or anything fancy. Just a well cut, roached cruising main as opposed to the hollow, negative roach found on many in-mast furling systems. It's a simple advantage found with in-boom systems.

How does your mainsail handle batten compression load at the luff tape batten pocket interface ? Something new ? When you jibe the mainsail huge load is transmitted from batten to pocket at the luff as it snaps from port to stb jibe.
The battens on my system do load the luf tape, but they have worked well for twenty years. The Schaefer system does have a system to transfer the loads directly from the battens to the mast. But we are only considering a 32 foot boat here, which is smaller and lighter than mine on which a basic system works just fine.

Motoring with a full main in a seaway will destroy the luff pockets as the main slats back and forth and the compression cannot be transferred into a batten car luff track .
Then don't do it.

Do you have leach line run down the luff..
Leach line running down the luff ???

How do you control mold formation from a wet horizontally furled main in the boom ? My sail looks old after a year.
Perhaps you have a problem in the Med, but in northern climes mould is no more of a problem than with a furled genoa.

How do you control chafe on the reefed main leach and luff as it saws on the side of the boom when you work, reefed, to windward in a seaway ?
The 'slot' at the top of the bom is very wide (boom is almost open topped) and the mainsail doesn't touch the boom.

How do you reef and " Boom Up" to keep the boom end from dragging thru the back of waves ? Ive never met a system that allows you to alter the geometry of boom height to suite sea conditions.

And I can assure you that when something goes wrong with the boom furler and you must drop, at sea, the uncontrolled luff mainsail with full battens on deck, that you have a science project on you hands. The last time I had to cut the carbon battens in half with an angle grinder and remove in two pieces to control the loose main on deck. Expensive day and the next 2 thousand miles without a mainsail.

We're considering a system for a small 32ft boat for family sailing. If you don't want one for ocean sailing, then that's fine. But this is not the situation on which the original poster was seeking information. The same with comments about tri-sails; but for your information you can put in three, very good deep reefs in with far less hassle than the third reef ever goes in on slab reefing, so the chance of needing a storm tri-sail on a lightweight 32footer, in this situation, is slim. But a separate track is the solution, as it is the best solutions with all rigs.

You wont sell me one. The whole system is an expensive lightweight steamroller marketed to folks who dont know how to correctly pull in a slab reef.
The real advantages of in-boom furling isn't really the reefing but the stowing of the sail. It's away with it's cover on long before those with a conventional main have managed to find the sail ties.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-09-2011, 06:18 PM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Thanks Crag.,
great comments. I'll store this info in the back of my mind with all the other info swirling around there.... I'm still in two minds about selling my launch and getting back into sailing.... If she sells soon, it'll help me make a decision. However, we had another great 2 days away this last weekend, and will keep doing so 'til she sells. (Or not!).
Keep cruising...
Pierre
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-10-2011, 03:08 PM
cwyckham cwyckham is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rep: 35 Posts: 4
Location: Victoria, Canada
It would help to understand what you want to use the boat for. Many people have given advice on what would be best for an ocean crossing blue water cruiser. However, that's not much help if you want to sail around the Hauraki Gulf on day sails with the occasional overnight thrown in.

You also want to consider the other parties involved. For example, your sailing partner may find interior space and comfort to be critical, while you favour sailing performance. It's obviously important that everybody feels comfortable aboard, or you won't be going out nearly as much as you would like!

Finally, I wouldn't necessarily put furling main on my list of must haves for any boat. In fact, I'd rather stay away. It's more expensive, more complicated, and in the case of in-mast will lead to some goofy sail shapes. All this would be worth it for a short-handed family cruising boat if it weren't for the fact that slab reefing is just so darned effective, simple, and cheap. The trick is to lead all lines back to the cockpit (which should be done on all the boats you're looking at anyways). With single line or double line reefing led back, you can easily reef single-handed. I can reef my Niagara 35 with double line reefing in well under a minute on my own.

Good Luck! You live in a fantastic sailing area.

Chris

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tantalus View Post
We've decided to sell our launch and get back into sailing. I need help deciding on what to get. Am looking at a new Bavaria 32; Jeanneau 33i; Beneteau 32; Hanse 32 & the HUnter 33.
Important criteria for us:
furling main & jib, auto helm, electric anchoring, head room, reasonable size bed, hot water, spray dodger, bimini, price. Along with the essential sailing abilities - obviously.
Any thoughts/ suggestions please?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-12-2011, 06:59 PM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Thanks for the advice, Chris. First of all, let me add a few more points: we won't be doing any major blue water trips, but will cruise for more than a single night at a time. We usually do 8 to 10 day trips in our current boat, Tantalus. The areas we cruise will be coastal / island hoping as far north as The Bay of Islands, east to Great Barrier Island, south around the Corramandel to the Mercury Islands and Whitianga, Whangamata and Tauranga. Although the range of boats I'm looking at are " small lightweight" boats, I'm confident they will suffice. I also agree that slab reefing is the way to go. Just my wife and I, so 32ft is adequate. Comfort - headroom and bed size etc are important. Another reason I'm looking at these particular models is their price and availability here as new boats delivered in Auckland... Exchange rate make them quite attractive. Plus the added joy of a brand new boat....
So far, I'm zeroing in on the Jeanneau Sun Oddesy 33i.comments please?
Pierre
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-12-2011, 07:28 PM
cwyckham cwyckham is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rep: 35 Posts: 4
Location: Victoria, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tantalus View Post
Thanks for the advice, Chris. First of all, let me add a few more points: we won't be doing any major blue water trips, but will cruise for more than a single night at a time. We usually do 8 to 10 day trips in our current boat, Tantalus. The areas we cruise will be coastal / island hoping as far north as The Bay of Islands, east to Great Barrier Island, south around the Corramandel to the Mercury Islands and Whitianga, Whangamata and Tauranga. Although the range of boats I'm looking at are " small lightweight" boats, I'm confident they will suffice. I also agree that slab reefing is the way to go. Just my wife and I, so 32ft is adequate. Comfort - headroom and bed size etc are important. Another reason I'm looking at these particular models is their price and availability here as new boats delivered in Auckland... Exchange rate make them quite attractive. Plus the added joy of a brand new boat....
So far, I'm zeroing in on the Jeanneau Sun Oddesy 33i.comments please?
Pierre
Well, I think you're looking at the right kind of boats, then. I know the area a little bit (lived in Auckland for a year and spent a week sailing around the Hauraki Gulf), and I think it's actually very similar to the area I live in here in Canada. The perfect boat is a lightweight, production coastal cruiser. If you end up with an ex race boat it may be too spartan for what you want, and a bluewater boat will be too expensive.

Around here, there is a very good market in used boats, and I wouldn't dream of spending the extra dollars for a new boat. However, markets are very different in different parts of the world, and I'm sure you're aware of what's for sale at your local yacht broker or on trademe. If you want to go new, more power to you. You won't have to spend all your days cursing the ***** who owned the boat before you and all the goofy things he did to your poor boat.

For the type of sailing you're doing, I wouldn't worry too much about which boat is stronger or faster, necessarily. I'd definitely do some research into resale value and quality of build, of course. After that, what's most important is just what feels right. I'd just go and sail each one (with your wife, of course), and you'll just know. Internet research is for narrowing down a short list and getting rid of any that are known to be poorly constructed. After that, it's more like dating. You just have to let your heart tell you which one's the boat for you.

I've never been on a Jeanneau Sun Odyssey 33i, but the SunFast 35 I was on for a few days last year was a really nice boat.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-14-2011, 11:32 AM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Hmmm, I've admired the Northshore Fisher motor sailers for many, many years, and now a 34 ketch has come on the market.......
Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-15-2011, 12:07 AM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Actually a Fisher 30, not the 34
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-15-2011, 03:27 PM
michael pierzga michael pierzga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 670 Posts: 2,457
Location: spain
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crag Cay View Post
The original question was from someone considering a 32 or 33 foot boat. All the models he said were being considered were lightweight, everyday boats. One of the 'givens' was that they wanted to have some form of mainsail furling and were enquiring as to the merits of either in-mast or in-boom. My comments were addressed to purely this issue. However I will reply to some of the other points.


Full battened full roach leach mainsails are nice but overrated on a cruising boat.
We're not talking about 'fat head' sails here or anything fancy. Just a well cut, roached cruising main as opposed to the hollow, negative roach found on many in-mast furling systems. It's a simple advantage found with in-boom systems.

How does your mainsail handle batten compression load at the luff tape batten pocket interface ? Something new ? When you jibe the mainsail huge load is transmitted from batten to pocket at the luff as it snaps from port to stb jibe.
The battens on my system do load the luf tape, but they have worked well for twenty years. The Schaefer system does have a system to transfer the loads directly from the battens to the mast. But we are only considering a 32 foot boat here, which is smaller and lighter than mine on which a basic system works just fine.

Motoring with a full main in a seaway will destroy the luff pockets as the main slats back and forth and the compression cannot be transferred into a batten car luff track .
Then don't do it.

Do you have leach line run down the luff..
Leach line running down the luff ???

How do you control mold formation from a wet horizontally furled main in the boom ? My sail looks old after a year.
Perhaps you have a problem in the Med, but in northern climes mould is no more of a problem than with a furled genoa.

How do you control chafe on the reefed main leach and luff as it saws on the side of the boom when you work, reefed, to windward in a seaway ?
The 'slot' at the top of the bom is very wide (boom is almost open topped) and the mainsail doesn't touch the boom.

How do you reef and " Boom Up" to keep the boom end from dragging thru the back of waves ? Ive never met a system that allows you to alter the geometry of boom height to suite sea conditions.

And I can assure you that when something goes wrong with the boom furler and you must drop, at sea, the uncontrolled luff mainsail with full battens on deck, that you have a science project on you hands. The last time I had to cut the carbon battens in half with an angle grinder and remove in two pieces to control the loose main on deck. Expensive day and the next 2 thousand miles without a mainsail.

We're considering a system for a small 32ft boat for family sailing. If you don't want one for ocean sailing, then that's fine. But this is not the situation on which the original poster was seeking information. The same with comments about tri-sails; but for your information you can put in three, very good deep reefs in with far less hassle than the third reef ever goes in on slab reefing, so the chance of needing a storm tri-sail on a lightweight 32footer, in this situation, is slim. But a separate track is the solution, as it is the best solutions with all rigs.

You wont sell me one. The whole system is an expensive lightweight steamroller marketed to folks who dont know how to correctly pull in a slab reef.
The real advantages of in-boom furling isn't really the reefing but the stowing of the sail. It's away with it's cover on long before those with a conventional main have managed to find the sail ties.
Well Crag...you seem to be happy with your roller. I use it seven days a week. How many miles have you done ? My observations come from 250,000 miles with a roller boom..
I can reef or flake, stow, cover a main with one hundred times less effort than stripping the beast off the boom, pushing it thru customs , then shipping it air freight to the nearest sailmaker with facilities for sewing on a new 30 meter luff tape.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-27-2011, 04:29 AM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
What about the Varianta 44? Any comments / thoughts / opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-28-2011, 06:45 PM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
€84k for a new 44' yacht? Hmmm, I like
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-05-2011, 11:35 PM
Tantalus Tantalus is offline
1963 kauri cruiser
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rep: 32 Posts: 66
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Done a heap of browsing on the web and YouTube etc. And cannot find any reason to not consider one of thes! I like the double aft cabin version and will sacrifice the mid- ship berths for an island berth instead of the v berth up forward. Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
to buy or not to buy a slip Boston Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating 38 08-23-2010 12:45 AM
Should I buy this MisterSteve124 Multihulls 23 07-24-2007 06:02 PM
I want to buy yacht design Kendzang Boat Design 0 11-22-2006 01:50 AM
help on info about a 16' sea cat; to buy or not to buy? bc22 Sailboats 0 08-05-2004 11:29 PM
What to buy becky Powerboats 2 03-17-2004 10:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net