| ||||
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
- the aspect ratio of your mainsail planform is reduced a bit, which will only be detrimental to performance when you sail upwind. - mass is reduced up aloft and some is added to the boom. Also, the shrouds will be a bit shorter. This means that the CG of your rig will be a bit lower; the CG of the hoisted mainsail will also be a bit lower, both of which enhance stability somewhat. - since your mainsail's centre of pressure will also be somewhat lower, the heeling moment at certain wind speeds will be a bit lower too. This might produce a slightly smaller heeling angle, hence less hull resistance. For some wind angles, this might even result in a slight speed increase... Summary: the somewhat lower CG of your rig and the somewhat lower centre of pressure on the mainsail stiffens your boat up a bit. You loose some performance when sailing upwind. This much from theory. Whether these changes are significant for a rather heavy displacement cruiser like the one you're building can only be found out by a full VPP analysis. take care, Hans |
|
#17
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
As Bob says, the angle makes little difference.
__________________ Proud supporter of The Far Kurnell Cat Racing Team I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. - Thomas A. Edison |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| One other concern that I have seen with shortening a rig is that the majority of the sail area is closer to the water and thus you lose wind speed due to the boundary layer effect. This would primarily concern light wind performance, as the stiffer boat would probably make up for the difference in heavy winds. |