Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2009, 11:45 PM
Tony-Pion 30 Tony-Pion 30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 8
Location: Australia
Increasing boom length and mainsail area

I am currently undertaking a complete refit of my Van de Stadt Pion 30 and am considering installing a longer boom and larger main sail so that I can install a new 'maxi' type (Lewmar terminology) traveller system aft of the cockpit. This will allow me to run the mainsheet to winches mounted on the cockpit coamings adjacent the helm for short handed sailling.

I am interested in comments about the effect of increasing the area of the mainsail from 20sqm to 25sqm and increasing the foot of the mainsail from 3.10m to 4.0m. I am particularly interested in the impact this will have on the ballance of the boat under sail with the movement of the centre of effort from the rig further aft.

The current rig is a reasonably high aspect ratio of P=10.5m and E=3.10m.

The keel is a swept back fin and is currently off the boat. I am prepared to modify the keel if necessary to account for any shift in centre of effort from the rig.

The boat is currently very well mannered on all points of sail.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2009, 12:03 AM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Much depends on the hull and the rig type, but no matter what, the boat will exhibit a stronger weather helm to a greaster or lesser degree.
I'm curious why you'd make such a drastic change in order to relocate the mainsheet further aft. That's a lot of money and in the end you may have more weather helm than you bargained for.
I'd rethink the whole idea and look at some alternatives.
Do you have some pictures of the boat, especially the cockpit?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-03-2009, 04:05 AM
Ramona's Avatar
Ramona Ramona is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep: 13 Posts: 99
Location: Australia
Tony,
I have just done something similar to My quarter tonner, Miller and Whitworth 26 designed by Ben Lexcen. Its a typical early 70's IOR boat with small main and large genoas. I used a Hobie 16 mast cut down as the boom and I have cut down a sail from a 30 footer to suit. I have just got to finish off hand sewing sail slugs to the full length batten pockets and its all set to go.

The reason I altered the sail plan is lee helm. I had lee helm in light breezes and it becomes neutral with about 18 to 20 knots. I sail single handed nearly all the time and having lee helm coming out of a tack is a real pain. I tried raking the mast back but still no weather helm. My new boom is 3.3 metres versus 2.8 and the new sail is Flatter with 3 full length battens. This will hopefully give me weather helm which will help sailing up wind and coming out of tacks, also safer.
If you have weather helm now in manageable amounts then adding more main may be a problem when you bear away off wind. The extra boom could also touch the water reaching and downwind. Your keel is cast iron too, how do you plan to alter that?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-03-2009, 08:26 AM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Why not just add more length to the boom and be done with it?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-03-2009, 01:10 PM
Paul B Paul B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Rep: 6 Posts: 1,696
Location: California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony-Pion 30 View Post
I am interested in comments about the effect of increasing the area of the mainsail from 20sqm to 25sqm and increasing the foot of the mainsail from 3.10m to 4.0m. I am particularly interested in the impact this will have on the ballance of the boat under sail with the movement of the centre of effort from the rig further aft.

The current rig is a reasonably high aspect ratio of P=10.5m and E=3.10m.
Back in the 1980s and early 1990s it was very common to increase the E of old IOR boats without any other modifications. We would go up to +20% in some cases with good results.

The boats sailed better on all points of sail. The amount the total Center of Lift moves is insignificant, so no need to move or modify the keel in most instances.

Your boat seems to be of the early IOR type sailplan, so it should be OK for you to try. Your idea to add 30% might be a bit much, although the resulting aspect ratio of 2.6 would still be pretty good.

My own non-IOR type boat has had the boom extended from 11.5 feet in increments to the current 13.5 feet with no issues.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:32 PM
Tony-Pion 30 Tony-Pion 30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 8
Location: Australia
Alan,

The picture looks a little more like this. The Pion 30's were built to Lloyds A100 and mine has no history of osmosis. The boat is currently in my back yard drying out and undergoing a total refit to the point that it has been completely gutted inside and the keel has been removed. I will be installing new wheel steering and have already taken delivery of 13 new Lewmar portlights and hatches.

This refit gives me the opportunity to recinfigure the standing and running rigging to suit my intended application of short handed day sailing, cruising with crew with the occasional 'around the cans' and Hamiton Island Race Week.

Time and labour are in plentiful supply and the purchase price gives a reasonable leway for expendature. I am thououghly enjoying the refit journey and hope that when it is finished it will be perfect.

I would like to relocate the traveller aft of the cockpit to relocate the stresses and allow to open up the keyhole companionway by installing a companionway hatch. This also allows for a better short handed setup. It will also give me the opportuniy to run all lines aft to the cockpit.

I have attached Pion 30 drawings from the Pion 30 web site and a photo of mine. you will notice that the Australian built Pions have a different coachhouse.
Attached Thumbnails
Increasing boom length and mainsail area-pion_30_drawing.jpg  Increasing boom length and mainsail area-dscn2417.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:35 PM
Tony-Pion 30 Tony-Pion 30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 8
Location: Australia
Ramona,

Love to hear how it performs when you get it finished.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:46 PM
Tony-Pion 30 Tony-Pion 30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 8
Location: Australia
Paul,

Thanks for your comments. I will take you suggestion on board to limit the extension of the foot which is in keeping with what Alan has suggested about extending the boom only. If I needed to modify the keel I would infill to void above the aft rake with steel plate and fair it. The keel prpofile is similar to a bulb so the upper section is only approximately 75mm thick so moving the thicker part of the keel aft with this should not bo too much of a concern. It will also locate the greatest lift from the keel higher up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:50 PM
Tony-Pion 30 Tony-Pion 30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 8
Location: Australia
Alan,

The only objection I have to extending the boom without extending the foot of the sail with it is a consmetic one. However there is always room for compromise. Perhaps I could paint the end of the boom black to try to conceal it??
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:52 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Sounds like fun alright. I don't know enough about the boat to comment intelligently, but good luck with the changes. Keep trying here and you'll eventually get someone to talk to who has the same boat. I owned a Carter 33 but unfortunately sold it before getting a chance to recommision.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-03-2009, 10:40 PM
Tony-Pion 30 Tony-Pion 30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 10 Posts: 8
Location: Australia
Alan,

Thanks for your input. You will see my requests for information from time to time along with my contributions where I feel I have enough knowlege to contribute. It gives me a buzz being able to discuss issues that I am passionate about with someone on the other side of the world. Gotta love the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:32 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony-Pion 30 View Post
Alan,

The only objection I have to extending the boom without extending the foot of the sail with it is a consmetic one. However there is always room for compromise. Perhaps I could paint the end of the boom black to try to conceal it??
I figured it was an aesthetic thing. I don't think there's anything you can do to hide it. Let form follow function.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:32 PM
Gilbert Gilbert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rep: 28 Posts: 511
Location: Cathlamet, WA
Unless you can keep the boom from lifting, depending on its length it could get hung up on the backstay.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-2009, 05:04 AM
Munter Munter is offline
Amateur
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Rep: 100 Posts: 222
Location: Australia
We extended the boom on our old Cole 43 because the original sailplan design was optimised for a certain rule type (RORC?) and the boat appeared under-canvassed compared to more modern designs. Like your application a longer boom gave better sheeting angles given the original location of the traveller. We didn't notice much change in the helm though this was on a mast-head rigged boat so our changes would represent a smaller change in the scheme of things compared to the changes you are proposing to your fractional rig.
__________________
Cole 43 Rumrunner II - An Australian classic

My home efficiency/renovation blog
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-04-2009, 09:43 AM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Though the foretriangle area appearss at least equal to his main's area. There are a few options if the helm does get a mite hard-mouthed. One is to rake the mast forward. Another is to add a bit of area to the keel's trailing edge. Finally, a short bowsprit (maybe 12"-18") is a very useful cruising feature. It won't need a bobstay if the underside is gusseted solidly to the stem, it gets the anchore roller out further, and shouldn't affect the existing headsails too much in terms of sheeting angles. I'd actually like the look if the gusset was straight and not clipper-shaped.
This all potentially increases the working sailplan modestly.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
converting mainsail Todor Sailboats 6 09-15-2009 06:33 PM
broken boom- mid-boom sheeting problem? somedaypam Boat Design 14 10-25-2007 10:14 AM
Wishbone Boom Versus Conventional Boom Doug Halsey Sailboats 31 06-04-2007 05:05 PM
Increasing Sail Area dm567 Sailboats 6 01-10-2007 08:36 PM
sail area to lateral area ratios Ian Boat Design 5 04-07-2004 06:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net