Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-16-2008, 07:49 PM
Guest625101138 Guest625101138 is offline
Previous Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 0 Posts: 0
Quote:
........
I dont know what Michlet is........
Michlet uses Michell's thin ship theory for determining wave drag, has a choice of ITTC1957 or Grigson for viscous drag and also has a component for calculating transom drag.

I have found it gives reliable results for efficient hulls. The drag on such hulls tends to be dominated by viscous drag anyhow. Modern sailing craft are using more slender hulls such as trimarans, catamarans and canting keel yachts. These boats are designed to stay upright as well so heel is not a key concern.

If the hull is designed to plane then Savitsky gives reasonable accuracy. I was a little surprised that Michlet and Savitsky are not too different at the bottom end of the planing range.

There is a post here that compares Michlet with CFD and actual data:
http://boatdesign.net/forums/showthread.php?t=20497
Curves attached.
Attached Thumbnails
Dry tank testing. Can there be such a material?-picture-12.png  
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-17-2008, 06:31 AM
nico nico is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rep: 52 Posts: 186
Location: Valencia
A nice article by Jason Ker. http://valenciasailing.blogspot.com/...-designer.html
__________________
____________
Nico
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-17-2008, 07:08 AM
fastwave fastwave is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep: 36 Posts: 73
Location: europe
Nico,
to make it 150 point you need a lot more computing power than 16 processors for the runs I am talking about. Although the comptures might be cheap the licenses are no that cheap. so 80euro a point is very very difficult to get.

on 16 processors you will be lucky to get a point/24hours. You will only achive this if you have a very good and developed sustem in place.


With regards to people still saying that full appended runs are not possible, I only have to say the following:

1. It is done.
2. Quoting Ian Campell and Andy Claughton, is not representative. Both work, worked for the wolfson unit which is a big time fan of tank testing and not a great supporter of CFD.

people seem to know a lot about AC teams on this forum, but I wonder how many actually have a good insight of what is going on.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Const Fn for tank testing? GuestR01312011 Sailboats 9 11-18-2007 05:34 PM
Digital Tank Testing Of 1924 Hull RSLOOP Sailboats 8 02-25-2007 07:14 PM
DIY tank testing. Frosty Boat Design 6 11-30-2006 06:58 AM
Student needs help with TANK TESTING jamesflett Boat Design 12 07-20-2006 08:54 PM
Tank Testing TimClark Boat Design 8 01-11-2006 09:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net