Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2005, 11:56 AM
nemo nemo is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rep: 137 Posts: 132
Location: GENOA, ITALY
Carbon Boom Design

Hi,
I have to design a carbon boom in place of an existing alluminum boom of a 24metres sloop.
First of all, the sources of loads are:
-clew outhaul,
-Mainsail,
-Sheet,
-Vang.
The tough thing, as usual when talking about masts and sails, is to determine their values!
I am thinking about using a Register's rule to calculate the force on the sails, such as Germanischer Lloyd. For the clew outhaul, the force could be obtained from the maximum working load of the existing outhaul's block. The same for the main sheet, and the max load of the hydraulic piston of the vang.
After having obtained these values, I could arrange a finite element model to figure out a laminate schedule.
Do you think it could work?
__________________
"water always knows better"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-25-2005, 12:27 PM
the_sphincter the_sphincter is offline
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 8 Posts: 63
Location: behind the grundle
More things to consider:
reefing
hydraulic vangs have been known to bend Al booms while pushing upward (usually don't think of vangs acting upwards, so just a heads up) and sheeting in the main all the way.
If you go with max working load on the blocks (go with breaking load actually), beef it up alot. I'd get pissed if my boom went out when my block did.
You'll also have to make sure (especially at gooseneck) that it can handle the axial and torsional force and transfer that properly to the gooseneck fitting.
I wish you luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2005, 02:18 PM
D'ARTOIS D'ARTOIS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 311 Posts: 1,069
Location: The Netherlands
Nemo, what will be the clew like - carbon on alu doesn't look like a good idea, but - of course - you know that. So of wat metrial is the mast made off?
Of course you may use a titanium clew - what are your options?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2005, 05:00 PM
Stephen Ditmore's Avatar
Stephen Ditmore Stephen Ditmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rep: 563 Posts: 1,025
Location: New York
Don't most serious sailmakers have a pretty good handle on this stuff? Seems to me if you know the loads on the sailcloth you should be able to calculate the rest...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2005, 06:24 AM
nemo nemo is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rep: 137 Posts: 132
Location: GENOA, ITALY
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_sphincter
More things to consider:
reefing
If you go with max working load on the blocks (go with breaking load actually), beef it up alot. I'd get pissed if my boom went out when my block did.
I wish you luck.
Thanks.. sphincter, you are right, proper factors of safety have to be applied.

D'Artois, I am not sure about mast and hardware material. All I know so far is that the owner wants a new "Park Avenue" boom, and a designer asked me to make structural calculations, but I still haven't seen the existing boom and its drawings.

Stephen, since the boat already has a working boom, I think my approach is easier.. otherwise I should call the sailmaker and ask about loads on the sailcloth, and anyway I am not sure that's a thing any sailmaker is able to calculate..

Talkin about materials, I am thinking about using High strenght carbon, unidirectional and +/- 45° (for the torsional load) for all the boom lenght, plus some 90° reinforcement in correspondence of vang, clew and sheet.
__________________
"water always knows better"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2005, 11:17 AM
D'ARTOIS D'ARTOIS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 311 Posts: 1,069
Location: The Netherlands
I am doing some teste with the connection of Teflon impregnated AlMg 4,5 and 6
in combination with carbon.
I run an acceleration test in light acid seawater as a medium and run an electric current through the Alu piece that is encapsulated in carbon. So far no optical damage, but it needs to run a few days longer before I may see ome damage - or not.

It is done to find out if Teflon impregnated Aluminium in combination wit carbon wil not react to each other, staying inert.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2005, 02:52 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 1918 Posts: 4,113
Location: Ontario
I just want to say good luck finding carbon. Prepregs in particular seem to be in short supply right now, I'm having a hell of a difficult time finding a few rolls of what should be common weights.
__________________
- Matt Marsh - Marsh Design (small craft blog and designs)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2005, 03:00 PM
the_sphincter the_sphincter is offline
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep: 8 Posts: 63
Location: behind the grundle
really? any idea why? I know boeing is making the new 787 out of carbon, and the new airbus has quite a bit in it. Any other reasons?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2005, 08:29 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
Boeing and Airbus are part of the reason. The US military is another reason, with the F/A-22 fighter, Predator Drone, helmets, body armour and other objects being made out of it. The Pentagon usually gets what it wants.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-26-2005, 08:44 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 1918 Posts: 4,113
Location: Ontario
The story I've been getting is that several years ago, a number of composite makers figured they had too much manufacturing capacity for the markets they had, and so several plants were mothballed.... then, with the surge of interest in carbon from aviation giants, boatbuilders and also carmakers, they found themselves at capacity again. Apparently the Boeing and Airbus plans to use carbon fibre in the new jets pushed the suppliers right to the edge and now there's waiting lists to get material.
__________________
- Matt Marsh - Marsh Design (small craft blog and designs)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-27-2005, 08:22 AM
D'ARTOIS D'ARTOIS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 311 Posts: 1,069
Location: The Netherlands
Not overhere.......
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-27-2005, 10:08 AM
nemo nemo is offline
Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Rep: 137 Posts: 132
Location: GENOA, ITALY
I think it's not so difficult to get enough carbon for a boom here...
Please can we go back to the original thread, otherwise we can start another thread about carbon fibre supply..
__________________
"water always knows better"
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-28-2005, 05:22 AM
Raggi_Thor's Avatar
Raggi_Thor Raggi_Thor is offline
Nav.arch/Designer/Builder
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rep: 696 Posts: 2,457
Location: Trondheim, NORWAY
Could you make the new boom as strong or dtronger than the old one?
Wouldn't that be easiest?
Woul'd that be too heavy?
__________________
Regards, Kvedja, mvh,
Ragnar Thor Mikkelsen
www.MBOATS.no
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-29-2005, 02:48 AM
Karsten Karsten is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 22 Posts: 146
Location: Sydney
I would be extremely carefull just to use the break strength of the hardware. You multiply one safety factor by the other and end up with hughe design loads. You have the actual (unknown) sail force the fitting supplier applies his safety factor to dimension the fitting and then you use the break strength of the fitting and multiply that by another safety factor to determine the required stength of the boom. I would check the loads and make sure they look sensible.
Using FE in composite design is a bit of a minefield if you don't have the proper software, experience and material allowables. You will be able to determine the yield in the boom and produce nice colourfull pictures but that's about all you can do with standard software. If you add 90 degree fibres it usually becomes critical in transverse microcracking of the resin. You would have to know all the allowable yields in all different directions for the different materials you use. The allowables also depend on the manufacturing method. Are you going to use hand lay-up or prepreg? I would keep my hands off this sort of job if you haven't got the proper tools and data.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-01-2005, 10:15 AM
JLP JLP is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 5
Location: france
composite park avenue booms are a pain in the ass to design.
my advice would be: concentrate the 0° fibres in the corners, that's where the bending stress will be.
then you have flat panels between these corners, these work mainly in shear so mainly 45° fibres, but since they are probably large and without curvature, you will have local buckling issues, so you probably will have to go for sandwich in the side and top panels.
finally, you need 90° fibres all along the boom to prevent the section from "ovalising" and probably some transverse bulkheads at vang and mainsheet position, and a longitudinal one under the clew track.

if you need some help on this, mail me at jeremy.palmer "at" wanadoo.fr
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
College for Naval Architecture Archive Education 15 04-07-2008 01:42 PM
Master in yacht design ambas Education 26 05-11-2006 02:47 AM
Looking for the right path to design and build ben_morel Education 44 11-24-2005 04:51 PM
Westlawn Shool of Yacht Design michal Education 9 03-07-2004 09:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net