Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-07-2008, 03:45 AM
BOATMIK's Avatar
BOATMIK BOATMIK is offline
Deeply flawed human being
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 190 Posts: 273
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
If you don't know about Mighetto ... consider not responding to his post ... he is waiting to take this thread to only he knows where.
__________________
my boat pages
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-07-2008, 05:23 AM
Pericles's Avatar
Pericles Pericles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 1117 Posts: 1,648
Location: The heights of High Wycombe, not too far from River Thames
Having read parts of his contributions, that's good advice. Water world, where's that? If he lives there then, how come these Q & As haven't occurred to him?

http://books.google.com/books?id=Y_3...0z0Q#PPA269,M1

Pericles
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-02-2008, 06:17 PM
Phil Dory Phil Dory is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rep: 10 Posts: 1
Location: Oregon
Wouldn't a heavy centerboard rip out its case in the case of a knockdown, when it would swing back in?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-02-2008, 07:09 PM
BOATMIK's Avatar
BOATMIK BOATMIK is offline
Deeply flawed human being
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rep: 190 Posts: 273
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Howdy Mr Dory,

With small boats it usually is not a problem.

With bigger ones it certainly can be - though normally if the case is properly designed the hull attachments are so much stronger than the top of the case that the damage is done higher up - either to the board itself or the case where they make contact.

it actually is quite amazing the forces that a properly designed and built centrecase can absorb with surprisingly little structure.

If the case is glued to both the floor and a bulkhead (either in the middle or the back of the case - plus some sort of web or structural floor at the front they seem to be quite failsafe up to quite big sizes.

But for bigger boats a lockdown mechanism - a pin or screw device or purchase or foam chock - all designed to break in a non serious mode if there is a serious collision can prevent it all falling back in the case.

This should be considered at any rate if there is much weight in the board as it will provide the stability that can help the boat recover from the knockdown.

Best wishes
Michael Storer
__________________
my boat pages
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-02-2008, 10:59 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Yacht Designer & Builder
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 3125 Posts: 9,403
Location: Eustis, FL
The case I've described above has metal floors, fore and aft. The forward end of the case also falls on a bulkhead. Being that the case, internal armature of the keel and centerboard are steel, plus the bulkhead and metal floor locations, I have little worry of the board causing damage in the event of a rough strike or grounding. The worst I'd expect is leading edge damage (which I also have a solution for) and pivot pin damage. Both of these aren't that uncommon in larger centerboard boats. The pin I've spec'd is twice the size necessary for the worst task I'd expect it to tolerate, which hopefully will thwart any bent pin issues.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-03-2008, 01:15 AM
Pericles's Avatar
Pericles Pericles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 1117 Posts: 1,648
Location: The heights of High Wycombe, not too far from River Thames
When I read of these concerns about the ballasted centre board sliding back into its case, I am reminded of the origins of the beetle and Porsche. The decision to put the engine in the rear led to years of work to make the vehicles handle safely. Development over design is how I have seen it described. Engine in front Herr Porsche!

Thus the discussions about the centre board suggest to me that the sensible step would be to double the hulls for stability and comfort and drop the ballast. On another thread there is JCD voicing his concerns about righting a catamaran. Based upon the fate of Groupama lll, which floated so well upside down that she preserved the lives of all her crew and was recovered, I'd say that multihulls rule! Although, if she'd been a catamaran she would not have capsized in the first place, All that grandstanding, flying two hulls, bloody boy racers in their flash new tri. Mutter, mutter, mutter. In my day, we didn't do things like that! Drive around like lunatics. No respect for other road users. Grumble, grumble, grumble. Grouch, grouch, grouch.

Pericles
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-03-2008, 06:29 PM
PAR's Avatar
PAR PAR is offline
Yacht Designer & Builder
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep: 3125 Posts: 9,403
Location: Eustis, FL
Pericle's, multihulls have their place, but most have understandable issues with them. I like mutlihulls and monos, having delivered and sailed many over the years, I have my preferences, but I've never seen a mono with a trap door in it's bottom (just in case). When a design has to look seriously at this particular contrivance, it leaves one to wonder (understandable). How would you feel if the next time you boarded an airliner, they made you put on a parachute (just in case)? Better yet, if Boeing made all of its future airliners with automatic parachute deployment devices. Not that it happens all the time mind you (say the wings have a nasty habit of falling off), but enough to force the designers to take serious consideration in it's regard?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-03-2008, 06:49 PM
Pericles's Avatar
Pericles Pericles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 1117 Posts: 1,648
Location: The heights of High Wycombe, not too far from River Thames
PAR.

I'm not worried!

I'm a wing walker in my spare time. The times I have put my foot through the doped fabric of the top wing are too numerous to mention. I never wear a parachute and I fallen off eight times already this year.

I am also economical with the truth.

Best wishes,

Perry
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-05-2008, 02:32 PM
Tad's Avatar
Tad Tad is offline
Yacht Designer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rep: 2037 Posts: 1,719
Location: Gabriola Island, B.C. Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAR View Post
I've never seen a mono with a trap door in it's bottom (just in case).
Have a look at the various open class monohull race boats, 60's, 40's, mini's, etc. They all have escape hatches in the transom, which is perfectly reasonable. The Volvo 70 rule requires one hatch that is useable and above water when the boat is inverted.

With the growing predilection for modern monohull sailing yachts to lose their ballast keels, I would suggest that escape hatches would be a very good idea. Unfortunately folks might think twice about buying them if they knew what the stability characteristics are when inverted and partially flooded.

We have now seen 100's of production multihulls delivered on their own bottoms from South Africa to the Caribbean, with very few (if any) inversions. I would submit that the escape hatches in their bridge decks (not bottoms) are perhaps leftovers from a previous age? Once again a design feature dictated by market pressure rather than necessity. These new multihulls are purchased by neophytes, not experienced people. The experienced monohullers (like you Par) are telling them they must have an escape hatch......maybe
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-10-2008, 08:32 PM
mcm mcm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 26 Posts: 65
Location: Port Townsend, Wa., USA
Consider a centerboard in the shape of a quarter arch.

Like a quarter of a round faced clock, where the 4.5 feet of leading edge is like one hand pointing at 7, and the other hand pointing at 10 being the 4.5 foot trailing edge.

Now consider the centerboard to be 1200 lbs. of steel, and the case also welded steel.

How should such a centerboard and case be built?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:40 PM
Seafarer24 Seafarer24 is offline
Sunset Chaser
 
Join Date: May 2005
Rep: 22 Posts: 205
Location: Tampa Bay
I've been looking for a nice cat-ketch to go cruising on, and this is one of the boats I've come across:


Click the picture for details.

1985 Herreshoff 31 Cat Ketch. Fiberglass hull built in Miami with optional 3' shoal draft! Honestly, I'd prefer the 4' draft version but the price is right on this boat. There is an Offshore 33 that I'm also considering which has a slightly deeper draft.

The Freedom 28 and 33 would also fit your description, as they have ~3' draft with their centerboards up. (IIRC)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-11-2008, 03:19 PM
mcm mcm is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 26 Posts: 65
Location: Port Townsend, Wa., USA
Seafarer24, that Herreshoff is a beauty.

The below the waterline photo showed some sweet underwater lines.

But they didn't describe the centerboard, and i can only assume that, like the hull, it is fiberglass and probable a blade shape rather than steel semi-circle shape.

Am i wrong in thinking that a swinging semi-circle arc shape makes a stronger and more stable board than a swinging blade shape?

How do you feel about that cat-ketch rig in a north-atlantic blow?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:26 AM
Paulo.AS's Avatar
Paulo.AS Paulo.AS is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 10 Posts: 30
Location: Brazil
MCM,

I believe your choice of steel is due to many reasons but durability must certainly be one of them. However boats built in steel need to have programmed into their design an allowance for loss in plate thickness due to rust (which will occur no matter how well kept the boat is), which is dictated by scantlings under "add x % mm per decade of boat life" or something like that. And this is why usually steel boats are built in the 50'+ range...
Also the eletrical systems bonding, and zincs number and positioning will have to be carefully thought of.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-03-2008, 04:17 AM
Gary Baigent Gary Baigent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Rep: 457 Posts: 1,404
Location: auckland nz
ballasted centreboarders

If you are really serious about centreboaders, light displacement is the way to go. Here are three New Zealand champions from the late 1970's. Note their relatively small rigs and yet these boats were incredibly fast. Ballast was mostly in lead bricks internally with some lead in the board tips; they were daggerboarders actually and not centreboarders.
Farr's One Tonner Jenny H and Whiting's similar sized (approximately 37 foot) Smackwater Jack off Cape Colville - the other being launched (note the easy going low trailer) is Whiting's Half Ton champion Newspaper Taxi, a 30 footer. Now they were real sailing boats and some enlightened person should build them again.
Attached Thumbnails
Ballasted Centerboard?-jennysmackwater.jpg  Ballasted Centerboard?-taxii.jpg  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water-ballasted multihulls xarax Boat Design 34 09-10-2008 03:24 PM
Ballasted Rudder SuperPiper Sailboats 11 11-27-2006 09:46 PM
Centerboard Wood trial1 Materials 9 07-17-2006 11:15 PM
Centerboard area Carlito's Sailboats 6 12-30-2005 04:13 PM
Designing a ballasted daggerboard quilbilly Boat Design 1 10-05-2004 11:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net