Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Sailboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-10-2005, 08:44 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
100' Supermaxi

ok, i was bored so i decided to pose this little challenge. Say that we people on this forum were going to collaborate on a supermaxi. what would you guys add to it. For the sake of not starting an argument, we will say it has a canting keel with the forward foil type to be determined by this years Sydney to Hobart Race.
Anyone have any ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-2005, 05:31 PM
Doug Lord
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sydney -Hobart

OK, I'll bite: was this race your way of introducing the 10° static heel test as a qualifying factor?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-2005, 05:43 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
no. They have eliminated that rule in the S-H, and i thought it was stupid anyway and would not have payed attention to it. The reason i referred to the Sydney to hobart is because there will be TMF 100' and 90' going against 100' CBTF. Whichever performs better will be the choice of this imaginary design.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-2005, 05:46 PM
Doug Lord
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
10°

Thats very interesting. I hadn't heard that the 10° rule had been trashed-are you sure?
If that's the case what a showdown it will be!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-2005, 06:56 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
I heard something about it because Skandia/wildthing Yachting claims that their 30m monster is allowed to cant her keel to its fullest extent, so the rig is much larger now, and she has essentially been turboed. Nicorette wont have any success in that race though. The boats to watch will be the 98+ footers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:14 PM
mackid068 mackid068 is offline
Semi-Newbie Posts Often
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 857
Location: CT, USA
I just would worry about any boat with a canting keel. Sydney-Hobart canting keel disasters are many.
__________________
Signed-
mackid068
_________
Sailing (n.) The art
of getting wet and going nowhere slowly
at great expense (it's fun though)
=/\= A sailing Trekkie!=/\=
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:16 PM
mackid068 mackid068 is offline
Semi-Newbie Posts Often
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 857
Location: CT, USA
How about an extremely quiet inboard engine? Sounds good. But seriously, how about making all rig components of kevlar/carbon-fiber composite
__________________
Signed-
mackid068
_________
Sailing (n.) The art
of getting wet and going nowhere slowly
at great expense (it's fun though)
=/\= A sailing Trekkie!=/\=
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2005, 04:36 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
that would be a good idea. Do you know whether the carbon fibre rigging componenets now being made are good at withstanding shock loads? Carbon fibre in general hs a nasty habit of exploding under stress...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-12-2005, 05:43 PM
tspeer tspeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 1313 Posts: 1,523
Location: Des Moines, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by usa2
...Say that we people on this forum were going to collaborate on a supermaxi. what would you guys add to it. ...
A second hull.
__________________
Tom Speer
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-12-2005, 07:59 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
"A second hull."

than that would be a maxi cat, not a supermaxi.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:04 PM
tspeer tspeer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Rep: 1313 Posts: 1,523
Location: Des Moines, Washington, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by usa2
"A second hull."

than that would be a maxi cat, not a supermaxi.
Exactly.

What is the point of compromising the structural and watertight integrity of the hull by putting on a canting keel? It's complex to operate, and has vulnerable machinery that is safety critical. It renders the boat unsuitable for any use other than Grand Prix racing, unlike earlier generations of race boats where the investment in the boat yielded a second life as a cruiser. And for all that, you still have a slow boat.

If you want to design a fast race boat, why not design a fast race boat?
__________________
Tom Speer
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:16 PM
mackid068 mackid068 is offline
Semi-Newbie Posts Often
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 857
Location: CT, USA
Well, you COULD design a mini for just sailing around. A second hull that is actually a second hull, maybe not for racing, but how about making the primary hull out of the standard material and having an interior hull (much like the pressure hull of a submarine, though not for pressure) as a safeguard? Make it out of a buoyant material with a strong outer shell just before an airspace.

something like this:

Regular hull ----> Air space ----> Shell for secondary hull made of aramid ----> buoyant material ----> another layer just to divide buoyant material from interior ----> interior.
__________________
Signed-
mackid068
_________
Sailing (n.) The art
of getting wet and going nowhere slowly
at great expense (it's fun though)
=/\= A sailing Trekkie!=/\=
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:22 PM
usa2's Avatar
usa2 usa2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep: 11 Posts: 538
Location: Maine
because as of now most major events are monohulls, and i am slightly biased towards monohulls. If i was trying to set all-out speed records, then i would go multi-hull. But im not, so why not stay with the monohull. Also, if one of these things was designed properly, it would be very seaworthy.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:30 PM
mackid068 mackid068 is offline
Semi-Newbie Posts Often
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 10 Posts: 857
Location: CT, USA
Monohulls have only slight advantages. Multihulls are nice and fast. I'll stick with this definition (which, if you replace certain aspects, works with all multi-hulls): Catamaran-A boat with two hulls, thereby two times more likely to hit a submerged object but will take two times longer to sink after hitting said object.
__________________
Signed-
mackid068
_________
Sailing (n.) The art
of getting wet and going nowhere slowly
at great expense (it's fun though)
=/\= A sailing Trekkie!=/\=
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:47 PM
astevo astevo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rep: 10 Posts: 69
Location: Sydney
Quote:
Originally Posted by tspeer
A second hull.
good call that one, the whole talk of how high performance a maxi moni is really irrelevant when you consider how much faster a raft is. the fact is monos are good for close quarters racing but as a linehonors chaser the only thing keeping them relevant is mono-only races.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Royal Crown Yachts 100' surface-effect ferry Jeff Powerboats 7 04-26-2010 11:14 AM
Transom thickness for outboard motor 100 to 250 hp hseneque Boatbuilding 2 08-19-2005 12:39 PM
CBTF(Canting Ballast Twin Foil) Doug Lord Sailboats 300 07-25-2005 09:35 PM
Leaking Mould for 100' Hull Infusion VIKING Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 13 01-06-2005 08:31 AM
100 years of boat designs from PM Magazine covers Duane Mc Boat Design 8 09-02-2004 08:43 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net