Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Most Recent Posts Gallery Images Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2011, 10:43 PM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Rice nozzle confusion

working out increased efficiency on a prop, and wondering why the losses at higher speed vs lower speed in rice nozzles? Looking at jet engines on aircraft, are they losing the same because of drag?

Last edited by Frog4 : 10-11-2011 at 10:46 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 10-12-2011, 02:19 AM
waikikin's Avatar
waikikin waikikin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep: 813 Posts: 1,557
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog4 View Post
working out increased efficiency on a prop, and wondering why the losses at higher speed vs lower speed in rice nozzles? Looking at jet engines on aircraft, are they losing the same because of drag?
I'd say the extra drag at speed, the nozzles seem to be preferred for slow & heavy vessels such as tugs & trawlers. I think "Rice" is a "brand" of nozzle profile, the marketing seems to infer that the nozzle is a percentage part of the propulsion, dunno if thats true, some one who really knows the propulsion game will. Here is a pair of Rice profile nozzles I fitted up to a self propelled barge........................ http://www.boatdesign.net/gallery/sh...2/ppuser/12438 ............. http://www.boatdesign.net/gallery/sh...5/ppuser/12438 ............. http://www.boatdesign.net/gallery/sh...6/ppuser/12438

All the best from Jeff.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-12-2011, 02:26 AM
baeckmo baeckmo is online now
Hydrodynamics
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Rep: 1097 Posts: 780
Location: Sweden
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog4 View Post
Looking at jet engines on aircraft, are they losing the same because of drag?
To make it short: Yes (you never see a nozzle on a fighter jet)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-12-2011, 02:46 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 692 Posts: 2,363
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
woudnt that be yes because the big fan is inside a housing?
as for the propulsor ( jet engine) it wouldnt work if it wasnt in a housing
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2011, 02:47 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 692 Posts: 2,363
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
be careful when using the term efficient when talking props
efficient at what?
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:35 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
there is a difference in a RICE SPEED NOZZLE and KORT NOZZLE

Rice speed nozzles have almost the same cross section as a jet engine housing, identical aero-dynamics ...

does the jet engine suffer the same drag problems at high speed as the rice speed nozzle?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2011, 08:41 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
be careful when using the term efficient when talking props
efficient at what?
http://www.propellerpages.com/?c=noz...w_Nozzles_Work

http://www.propellerpages.com/?c=noz...d_Nozzle_Tests
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-17-2011, 08:44 PM
Yellowjacket Yellowjacket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rep: 447 Posts: 446
Location: Landlocked...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog4 View Post
working out increased efficiency on a prop, and wondering why the losses at higher speed vs lower speed in rice nozzles? Looking at jet engines on aircraft, are they losing the same because of drag?
It isn't quite the same.

In a turbofan engine the fan diameter is substantially reduced (compared to a similar power open propeller or propfan) and the blade count is increased. If the blades didn't have a shroud the tip losses would kill the efficiency. The inlet of the fan is designed to match the airflow at high speed and is smaller than the fan tip. This allows the air to slow down as it enter the fan when you are at cruise. As the aircraft goes to high speed, the required fan airflow comes into line with the airflow passed by the inlet. At low speed the fan efficiency is better than a turbojet, but it isn't as good as a prop.

Propulsive efficiency is based on the differece between the speed of the vehicle and the speed of the acclerating flow that is creating the thrust. Moving more air at a lower velocity difference gives you high efficiency. At high speed (and altitude) the fan becomes efficient. This happens at higher velocities where the compressibility effects of air come into play (the fan blade tips are in the transonic range and flow velocity out the back end of a turbofan nearly sonic).

These "nozzles" reduce tip losses and provide more thrust at low speed than if the nozzle wasn't there. But the tip shroud ring results in a large drag increment at high speeds that is unacceptable.

You could do the same thing as these nozzles by putting a ring around a typical small airplane propeller and the results would be much the same, it would provide more low speed thrust and have higher drag at higher speed. There was an airplane that used a shrouded prop, it was called the Fantrainer, and it had a much smaller higher speed fan in a shrouded ring in the aft fuselage. It worked fine, but wasn't as efficient as an open prop.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:01 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
It isn't quite the same.

---

You could do the same thing as these nozzles by putting a ring around a typical small airplane propeller and the results would be much the same, it would provide more low speed thrust and have higher drag at higher speed. There was an airplane that used a shrouded prop, it was called the Fantrainer, and it had a much smaller higher speed fan in a shrouded ring in the aft fuselage. It worked fine, but wasn't as efficient as an open prop.
thanks Yellowjacket ...

I was looking at just rings or prop guards ... studying the rice speed nozzle patent, he gave some numbers for prop clearance and nozzle depth in proportion to prop diameter ... they seem very tight ... .040" prop clearance for my application ...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2011, 09:44 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 692 Posts: 2,363
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
anything you put in the water will kill speed so forget it
There was an experiment with a modern hi bypass jet with an unshrouded high speed prop that was better then a conventional shrouded bypass fan as they all are now, and it was way more efficient but they decided the consumer would not like it
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-18-2011, 10:14 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
anything you put in the water will kill speed so forget it.
It is for an electric TUGBOAT build, "speed" is not what we are looking for ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
There was an experiment with a modern hi bypass jet with an unshrouded high speed prop that was better then a conventional shrouded bypass fan as they all are now, and it was way more efficient but they decided the consumer would not like it
You would happen to have any links to that "experiment" would you???
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-18-2011, 10:23 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 692 Posts: 2,363
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propfan
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-18-2011, 10:44 AM
Frog4's Avatar
Frog4 Frog4 is offline
Proletariat
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rep: 12 Posts: 150
Location: Arizona desert
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
thanks powerabout ...

what I find perplexing is that ALL of those were shelved because of "lower fuel prices" yet all the PoC's proved out a 30% reduction in fuel consumption.

WHY O WHY WOULD THEY SHELVE THEM???? That is 30% more MONEY in their pocket ... retarded backward @#$ thinking ...
Reply With Quote


  #14  
Old 10-18-2011, 10:58 AM
Yellowjacket Yellowjacket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Rep: 447 Posts: 446
Location: Landlocked...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frog4 View Post
thanks powerabout ...

what I find perplexing is that ALL of those were shelved because of "lower fuel prices" yet all the PoC's proved out a 30% reduction in fuel consumption.

WHY O WHY WOULD THEY SHELVE THEM???? That is 30% more MONEY in their pocket ... retarded backward @#$ thinking ...
The propfan worked, but it made more noise. The airlines pass on fuel cost to the customer. So long as all the airlines have the same equipment they would be competitive. The customers would rather have a more comfortable trip than save $15 on each leg of a trip. The airlines were more concerned that the customers wouldn't accept the higer noise for a small reduction in air fares.

Note that Pratt & Whitney is developing a larger "geared" fan that runs at lower speeds and provides better propulsive efficiency and is more quiet than regular fans and a lot more quiet than propfans.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kort nozzle Brian.Lin Propulsion 5 03-17-2010 09:19 AM
Confusion on topcoat paint coverage RAMC Materials 0 10-26-2008 02:27 PM
Prop choice confusion curtis73 Sterndrives 13 04-20-2007 01:42 PM
I need a jet nozzle dmoss69 Jet Drives 5 02-11-2007 01:28 PM
Confusion Below the Waterline Texas Boater Wooden Boat Building and Restoration 2 05-20-2006 04:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2014 Boat Design Net