| ||||
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Relative gas consumption from 2 vs 1 engine How would the total gas consumption compare between 1 big engine vs 2 smaller, as in 1- 20 hp vs 2-10 hp or 1-100 hp vs 2-50 hp? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| To general a question. What you need to do is find the BSFC (Brake Specific Fuel Consumption) for each engine. It measures pounds of fuel per hour per horsepower. A good number is around 0.50, plus or minus.
__________________ Stonebreaker Ph.D in Redneck Engineering - Piling it higher and Deeper. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| The question is simple enough, but the answer isn't because there are too many factors. Specific fuel consumption is a secret that most manufacturers do not want to share with you, except the diesel guys like Cummins. A modern diesel uses approx. 205 grams per hour for each HP, that's 30-50% better than any gasoline engine. The figure is always given for the rpm with max. torque. Two engines have a bit more friction than one, but smaller engines with carbs control their mixture better at part throttle. Injection engines do not have that problem. Two props can be more efficient that one, and they steer better, but the main reason to use two engines always was and is the reliability. I helped a guy yesterday who had a belt guide roller broken on his 320 HP Merc. No belt tension, so no cooling, no power steering, no alternator. Two smaller engines would have been better. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| relative power from 2 versus 1 outboard engine | jedkins | Outboards | 9 | 08-18-2007 05:16 AM |
| Fuel Consumption | ashbana | Boat Design | 0 | 06-21-2007 04:52 AM |
| Fuel Consumption | rossmon1 | Propulsion | 6 | 06-26-2006 12:18 PM |
| Carbon/Glass relative strengths | Tingle | Materials | 12 | 12-23-2005 11:21 AM |
| FOR SALE: MerCruiser 260hp gas inboard engine | lockhughes | Marketplace | 3 | 04-14-2005 10:08 PM |