| ||||
|
#91
| ||||
| ||||
| The larger engine has much larger area of the cylinder wall, head and piston crown. Much greater heat loss on a heat engine = less efficiency. I like your post FAST FRED Easy Rider |
|
#92
| |||
| |||
| That's a factor, but other factors are more significant. Check a bsfc map. |
|
#93
| ||||
| ||||
| back home....... Well to compare apples to apples....everyone wants to compare a new outboard (aluminum,DOHC,multivalve,new injection etc) to old school heavy diesels. I only used a VW once as it,other than maybe Steyr, is the highest tech (turbo,direct injection,aluminum etc) small diesel engine out there. U may notice I used Yan and outboards from the same year. I have shown weights,I have shown fuel charts and diesel kicks a$$ on the outboard. Now it's gone to underloading....no one has yet to explain why my 350 hp (peak) and I think around 220 continuous/700tq Cummins can loaf down the freeway for hundreds of thousands of km using 9-10 litres an hour. So maybe 40(?) hp to run down the freeway which means it's running at ~20% load. Which,according to popular ideals,means it should be glazing and blowing blue and be a wreck after a very short time. But after 425,000 km all that has been needed is regular maintenance and it still burns very little oil (shows 3 mm on the stick) between changes. Now on Detroits and loading....thats another story. |
|
#94
| ||||
| ||||
| West Van, Where'd you find trucking land w/o hills, grades, stop lights on hills ect. I drove an 18 wheel flat bed w a 335 Cummins and only a 10 speed gear and I recall loading it regularly more that my boat engine and I run the boat engine harder than most. I don't know if under loading's worth talking about as everyone's doing it and no one seems ready to stop. Easy |
|
#95
| ||||
| ||||
| Been East of the Rockies? In case not: it's pretty much flat. One business I have is specialized manufacture of light yet bulky items for the oil industry. My driver makes the deliveries,drives around Alberta....and it's flat. |
|
#96
| |||
| |||
| "Much better to install the 20-30 hp engine in the first place." No question , and most sailboat folks DO install a far better choice in choosing engines. The hassle is the power cruisers , biggest oxymoron is "fast trawlers", where the boat has 400hp and cruises at 7K on 30hp. "My driver makes the deliveries,drives around Alberta....and it's flat." Sure but every stoplight , every bit of traffic will have the vehicle accelerate , usually with mucho throttle. The changing loads , changes in RPM and esp the blasts of throttle on acceleration help clean the carbon out and the engine functioning. "down the freeway for hundreds of thousands of km using 9-10 litres an hour. So maybe 40(?) hp to run down the freeway which means it's running at ~20% load." 10L per hour would to me be 2 1/2 gph . AT a cruise of 60mph that would be about 23 miles per gallon , this is a far cry from the 5 to 7 mpg most class 8 trucks get here. What is your secret for 300% to 400% better fuel mileage? FF |
|
#97
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
"With mucho throttle" WTF? Well you've never driven one. Plz don't try to tell me how my truck runs or it's mileage,I don't tell you how to run your Detroits. I never said it was a semi truck- why do you assume so? """Fuel capacity: 34 gals. """"Observed fuel economy: 17 city / 21 highway http://www.gulfcoastnews.com/autoweb...eRamDiesel.htm |
|
#98
| |||
| |||
| I never said it was a semi truck- why do you assume so? my 350 hp (peak) This is not what is common in a delivery van, a 350 hp engine is usually far to expensive for this service , more common would be a throw away like a CAT 3208 , maybe 200 hp on a really GREAT day. FF |
|
#99
| |||
| |||
| Fred: You need to check out the diesels that are being offered in the 3500 and 4500 class of pickup trucks by Ford/GM/Dodge. 350 hp puts the engine at the bottom of the class - 2011 GM's are rated at 397hp, and 765 lb-ft of torque. My '07 Ram only has 325 hp, and it normally exceeds 20 mpg (US), in the mountains. And btw, using full throttle when empty is not a good idea. Tires and speeding tickets get expensive very quickly. Truly remarkable performance for a 7000lb vehicle. Jim |
|
#100
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
|
#101
| |||
| |||
| Automotive (or tiny truck) engines are nor rated the same way as industrial diesels or engines usually selected as boat motors. A look at any site of boat motors will usually show 4 or 5 HP graphs. One is for 15 -30 seconds , getting a hulk up on plane. The other graphs will show lower and lower power till you get to the 24/7 workboat rating. IT is the work boat rating that should be used to assure engine longevity. Not only for the load for days on end , but using at least 60 % of the 24/7 loading for cruising will usually stop the slobber hassles. Sometimes a 24/7 rated engine at cruise will be only a tiny percentage of the advertised Flash rating, so it fools folks into thinking their 475hp is doing fine at 60 hp. When actually its a 100Hp engine (24/7) and 60 hp cruising is fine. FF |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Outboard power curves / fuel consumption | Willallison | Outboards | 1 | 12-27-2009 09:05 PM |
| Fuel Consumption | Rod Kelly | Boat Design | 26 | 07-10-2009 03:10 PM |
| outboard fuel consumption | tranmkp | Outboards | 2 | 08-12-2008 02:11 PM |
| Fuel Consumption | rossmon1 | Propulsion | 6 | 06-26-2006 01:18 PM |
| Diesel Fuel consumption | gcampbell | Diesel Engines | 5 | 11-28-2005 06:41 AM |