| ||||
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Variable pitch props. Worth it on small boat? I remember reading a thread by Richard where he listed the positives of a variable pitch prop and how they are not expensive when you are starting from scratch since you don't need a gearbox etc. Also I cant see, to find the thread anymore. Anyone got a link? ![]() Somehow I think this article was meant more for larger boats/ships. Are variable pitch props still economical for smaller sailing boats? With smaller boats and higher engine speeds you would still need gear reduction wouldn't you? How small can you get these things and how much do they cost? Is it worth it on a 30-40 foot sailing boat? I just found this and have been reading... http://www.kastenmarine.com/CPprops.htm |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| When you build new the cost of the CPP... controlable pitch props.. setup is competitive with conventional transmission shafting arrangements. When you refit...it becomes expensive. New shaft log, new P bracket, new engine coupling , new engine alignment, and a new control system. On small sailing yachts the size of the CPP prop hub is to your disadvantage due to drag. Most sailing applications use a MAX prop . Low drag...very efficient reverse thrust and able to be fine tuned . also expensive. Good article on general CPP for small craft. Interesting that I never see any liturature on a CPP lifecycle. How many forward reverse featherings are needed to produce a service interval ? The max prop will need service every year due to grease blow . Blade STOP wear is also an issue on MAX props. http://www.kastenmarine.com/CPprops.htm |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Thanks for the link Michael ![]() I will take a look at the other thread again too. Thanks Brian. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| There is a trend to run motors at their optimal rpm - usually where max torque is made, and where fuel is the most economic. The motor iow sits on one rpm and stays there. In this case the CPP would be a good option since you can adjust speed best for the load of the vessel while remaining at best economy.
__________________ Regards Fanie Water ! Just gimme water ! |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| VPP are so good that everyone should have one...only money keeps it this way |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Yes, wouldn't mind having a few myself. Have plans for them ![]()
__________________ Regards Fanie Water ! Just gimme water ! |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Another approach is using 2 props on the same shaft, rather than a variable pitch. I have used a small prop in front followed by a large prop in rear. With a 2 speed gearbox or one speed electric drive you can select the two for maximum efficiency. Both are run at low rpm, high torque together and the rear prop is removed by quick release if needed for shallow running at high speed. That is one thing a variable pitch prop can't do, which is increase or decrease length for better efficiency. Has worked for me on very small boats anyway.. Hope this helps, Porta Quote:
|
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
That is interesting. Any pics for us ? Special on how you release the one or the other prop. Bert |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Donīt mix up that Max prop stuff with a CPP folks! It is a completely different animal and although it can be "adjusted" it is nothing but a folding prop. And please forget the term "variable pitch prop" we do not have them on boats. Those are rarely installed, and only on commercial craft to finetune the pitch when the ship is hauled out! Sabb is still providing a smaller unit for sailboats. The service life is much longer than that of a gearbox. I had a CPP on a 21 meter police boat which had never seen a hand touching it in 40 years of hard service. (and the service records were seamless) Another reason for the northern European fishermen to install CPPīs exclusively. No service. (except for greasing the hub every few years on haulout) Porta, I too would be very interested to learn how you do that!!! And more so, how you compare the efficiency of such setup with a CPP! (remember it is not a VPP, as you always like to name it) Regards Richard |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I can offer some real numbers on a small boat conversion. In my case I removed a 47 hp Perkins 4-107 from a boat displacing about 8,500 lb. The 4-107 was propped to top out at about 2,400 rpm where the engine was producing around 28 hp. I operated the boat at around 1,600 rpm and the fuel burn was about 0.8 gph at 5.8 knots. I replaced this setup with a Sabb 2H (18hp at 2,250 rpm) and 490 mm two blade controllable pitch propeller. Fuel burn at 5.8 knots dropped to 0.62 gph. This is an S/L of 1.25 and a savings in fuel burn of about 22% With that tremendous savings I could buy dinner out for four at the end of a season. ![]() |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| Not sure but last year (in a phone call) they stated that their gear don't turn the blades to feathering posion, only from ahead to astern. So it seems for sailboats it gotto be West Mekan http://www.westmekan.com/index.php?o...d=12&Itemid=14 . There's also one another company possibly, but haven't asked them yet.. |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I have been looking around also a secondhand setup locally to see if there's a way to modify.. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| I cannot easily throw a picture up here of the manual. Its in the boat and the boat is shrink wrapped. If my memory serves me right the only difference between the two props was the drive block in the prop. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FRANCE HELICES variable pitch surface drive | PetterM | Surface Drives | 5 | 01-01-2012 06:52 PM |
| Variable Pitch Surface Drive? | PetterM | Surface Drives | 6 | 01-01-2012 06:47 PM |
| Variable Pitch Props | Woodnaut | Outboards | 13 | 07-15-2006 03:31 PM |
| variable pitch | captword | Boat Design | 11 | 03-31-2005 12:34 AM |
| Design of variable pitch propellers? anybody got a clue? | Freddy Lemieux | Boat Design | 13 | 08-02-2004 05:01 AM |