| ||||
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Prop Efficiency Formulas Please Help I am trying to find if there is more than one formula for finding the efficiency of a prop, NOT the efficiency of that prop from the manufacturer as designed, but the efficiency of the prop on one particular planing boat with one particular motor. Maybe a better way to state this question is, the propeller efficiency for any particular installation, without having to go through a super detailed analysis of fluid dynamics. Let's say these are the parameters for this installation: Motor RPM: 5,750 Gear Ratio: 2:33 to 1 Propeller RPM: 2,468 for both props HP at prop at WOT: 74 Prop: SS 3 Blade 36.9 MPH 13" Diameter 17" Pitch AND a Prop: SS 4 Blade 35.1 MPH 12 3/4" Diameter 16" Pitch Boat Weight: 2,000 pounds Boat Length: 18' With a Speed Length Ratio of 7.8 The 3 blade has a crouch number of: 192 The 4 blade has a crouch number of: 182 H Last edited by hwsiii : 03-02-2010 at 09:47 AM. Reason: Added Data |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| get the wageninger B-series propeller charts.. this will help you...
__________________ Cheers Aswin "Aim of any argument or discussion must not be victory, but progress." |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| FWIW, there are some methods, but they are not very percise. 17" pitch x 2468 rpm = Advance of 58.3 ft/sec 16" pitch x 2468 rpm = Advance of 54.8 ft sec 58.3 ft/sec - 36.9 mph = Slip of 4.2 ft/sec 54.8 ft/sec - 35.1 mph = Slip of 3.3 ft/sec Thrust EHP= .5*1.990*((13/12)^2/4)*pi*4.2*54.12^2 = 20.5 hp Thrust EHP= .5*1.990*((12.75/12)^2/4)*pi*3.3*51.48^2 = 14.2 hp 20.5 hp / 74 hp = 28% 14.2 hp / 74 hp = 19% Both wheels are over bladed and under pitched for top speed with the 13" wheel doing better, nearer to typical for small speed boats. But how do you feel about each's hole shot "power"?
__________________ A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
In that case EHP should be 41 and 28.4 with efficiencies of 56% and 38% respectively. This means that the 13" wheel is not doing too bad, about what I'd expect for a good small boat match, but the 12.75" wheel is still over bladed and under pitched.
__________________ A vessel is nothing but a bunch of opinions and compromises held together by the faith of the builders and engineers that they did it correctly. Therefor the only thing a Naval Architect has to sell is his opinion. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Prop Efficiency For the 3 blade case with speed of 36.9 mph or 32.1 knots, prop RPM 2468, diameter 13", the best prop pitch ratio is 1.5, thus pitch 19" and open water efficiency in the range of 73.5%. The slip is ablut 19% This according to a couple of sources. The efficiency has the potential of increasing to 76% with a 13.6" prop with pitch of 19". The slip is about 16%. You have to deduct the losses of all of the components between the prop and the engine shaft to determine the shp available at the prop. The above numbers were based upon the 74 hp being available at the prop. Hope this gives you some numbers to ponder. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jet vs. Prop Efficiency | Michael1 | Jet Drives | 29 | 11-19-2011 07:29 AM |
| Propco Prop Efficiency Gains | jhutches | Props | 1 | 08-11-2009 12:30 PM |
| Prop efficiency curves | LostInBoston | Props | 4 | 03-15-2009 01:25 AM |
| Prop efficiency? | MagicMike | Outboards | 7 | 10-02-2006 07:49 AM |
| Prop Efficiency in Reverse | phillip | Props | 3 | 05-01-2005 10:36 AM |