Shafts thru the transom?

Discussion in 'Powerboats' started by Buck, Sep 17, 2003.

  1. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,802
    Likes: 1,721, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    If the rudder gets enough water, there is no way the propeller runs ventilated. I asked about some data before, because cavitating propellers become efficient at over 40 Knots. If your boat is running 30 Knots, it is slower than one with an outdrive. I still don't really understand the advantages you claim. Can you post a photo of the stern of the boat planing? Seeing is believing:)
     
  2. tom kane
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 1,768
    Likes: 49, Points: 58, Legacy Rep: 389
    Location: Hamilton.New Zealand.

    tom kane Senior Member

    I have been watching Simplicity-Marine for some time..just had
    another look.Seem to have some knowlegable contacts.Mostly
    conventional and now widly used components.Still have a long way to go.I do not know how shallow draught is achieved when a craft draws so much water.Where does surface propulsion
    start and finish?. tom kane
     
  3. Palmer
    Joined: Nov 2002
    Posts: 53
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Tacoma, Wa

    Palmer Junior Member

    It looks like the bottom third or so of the rudder would be immersed at speed. It would only be all the way out of the water when the wheel is too. It doesn't look like a bad setup, my only question would be regarding the efficiency of that type of wheel when it's ventilating
     
  4. 8knots
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 266
    Likes: 12, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 352
    Location: Wasilla Alaska

    8knots A little on the slow side

    How about water jets such as berkly's? few moving parts and fairly easy install and the ultimate in shallow draft. Just an idea;)
    8Knots
     
  5. tom kane
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 1,768
    Likes: 49, Points: 58, Legacy Rep: 389
    Location: Hamilton.New Zealand.

    tom kane Senior Member

    Observant Palmer..Jet propulsion just like other systems are
    badly misunderstood in their capabilities,especially shallow
    water operation.Some do produce an enlightening Operation
    manual.tom kane.
     
  6. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,802
    Likes: 1,721, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    If jet drives were "badly misunderstood", and I wished they were, we wouldn't have an invasion of PWC's.
     
  7. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    nor would 90 % of commercial fast ferries and mega-yachts be using them.....
     
  8. tom kane
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 1,768
    Likes: 49, Points: 58, Legacy Rep: 389
    Location: Hamilton.New Zealand.

    tom kane Senior Member

    Thanks will..for proving a point..mega-yachts and fast commercial
    ferries..always operate in shallow water.I wonder what happened to our surface drive forum..againstum.Tom Kane.
     
  9. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Sorry Tom - don't quite understand your point. I was agreeing with Gonzo - jets are a well established, veru reliable and afficient drive system.
    As with all systems though, they appropriate and inappriate applications.
     
  10. BrettM
    Joined: Apr 2002
    Posts: 204
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 16
    Location: Australia

    BrettM Senior Member

    I didn't realise that the large cats used to crosss Bass straight and the english channel at high speed used jets because the water is shallow... :)
     
  11. tom kane
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 1,768
    Likes: 49, Points: 58, Legacy Rep: 389
    Location: Hamilton.New Zealand.

    tom kane Senior Member

    You are right will about in appropriate usage.manafacturers
    usually supply sensible saftey and operation information.
    Knowing the un-biased history and the people who developed
    and made the important break-throughs,and the financing,the litigation and the patent claims of several leading jet systems
    is interesting.Has some one said jet systems are not what you
    say they are?What has happened to surface drive forum.tom kane
     
  12. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member


    :D :D

    Tom - sorry we didn't mean to steer the subject away from surface drives, but for the sppeds mentioned by CaptnPPan for his boat (30 odd knots) then they would be an efficient propulsion choice.
     
  13. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,802
    Likes: 1,721, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    Speed is at the core of this discussion. At less than 40 knots, surface drives make no sense.
     
  14. dougfrolich
    Joined: Nov 2002
    Posts: 661
    Likes: 21, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 225
    Location: San Francisco

    dougfrolich Senior Member

    Whoop there it is!

    I have a boat in my gallery with a similar drive to the capt. Just makes good sense for 40+
     

    Attached Files:


  15. dougfrolich
    Joined: Nov 2002
    Posts: 661
    Likes: 21, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 225
    Location: San Francisco

    dougfrolich Senior Member

    The real deal
     

    Attached Files:

    1 person likes this.
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.