Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Powerboats
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Most Recent Posts Gallery Images Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #46  
Old 04-12-2007, 06:27 AM
Pericles's Avatar
Pericles Pericles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 1251 Posts: 1,686
Location: The heights of High Wycombe, not too far from River Thames
fcfc,

Thanks for the link to Chesapeake. I return the favour with another box keel boat, from S Oz.
http://www.duckflatwoodenboats.com/m...hed%20Articles

The solar powered Mundoo III is another in the line of lightweight cruisers that would do well on the River Thames. It's got me thinking!

Regards,

Pericles
Reply With Quote


  #47  
Old 04-12-2007, 10:25 AM
SAQuestor SAQuestor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rep: 91 Posts: 163
Location: San Antonio
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAST FRED View Post
{snippage}
Probably , but the shown fit and finish will take years and loads more cash to get.

If like me , a workboat style , clean and painted , with wood trim will do , it should be simple enough.
Quality paint is my best friend. Varnished wood is used for accent trim only. Obviously cheaper and IMO much more appropriate for a "homemade" boat in today's "environmentally concerned" collective consciousness. As always, YMMV.

Best,

Leo
__________________
You're not old until regrets replace dreams.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-12-2007, 10:43 PM
Wayne Grabow Wayne Grabow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Rep: 297 Posts: 195
Location: Colorado
"My takeaways from these pages are:
Fine entry. Flat buttock lines. Light weight.
What other important ideas/features did your eyes pick out?
Best, Leo"

I used to live near the Antique Boat Museum in Clayton, NY. Old powerboats, some speed record holders of the day, are featured in their exhibits. The early engines (prior to surplus aircraft engines from WWI becoming available) simply did not have the power-to-weight ratio to make planing a possibility. Semi-planing was the best they could do. So I went there and sat or laid on the floor, studying the hull shapes, trying to determine what features helped them maximize their speed. I agree with your list.

I am guessing that a small B/L ratio is also assumed to be true. The fine entry pushes water aside gently. (Relative) Light weight minimized the displaced mass. Flat buttocks minimized stern squat. The small B/L ratio allowed adequate displacement with minimal frontal area. Additionally a long, slender hull allowed a gentle transition from water being pushed aside by the bow to water flowing under the low-deadrise stern.

I seemed to also notice one other feature- a gentle but noticeable rocker confined approximately to the middle third of the hull with a straight keel forward and a straight run aft. I can't be sure because these were old boats which might simply be sagging with age. But such a rocker would make sense. Without rocker that stern would likely be dragging in the water; not good at lower speeds. Also, at increased speed, power is applied low under the stern and increased drag would tend to concentrate at the bow wave. Under these conditions, would not the boat tend to squat slightly, rotating about that central rocker, presenting a more cutaway bow profile and a more flat planing surface aft? Perhaps this profile helped the hull to slightly exceed the confines of displacement hull theory and enter the indistinct semi-planing realm. This is only my guess; I'll leave it to the more experienced to decide if it may be valid.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:11 AM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 399 Posts: 744
Location: france,europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAQuestor View Post
OK. Nice boat. Using my own labor over a 3 to 4 year build period, can I build one essentially equivalent in size and power for under $60K?

Leo
I think probably. But do not expect the same finish, style and performance as the andreyale.

The other question is what else can you do with that budget and time ?
How does it compare to a homebuilt ?

http://www.yachtworld.com/core/listi...&toPrice=45000

You have $15K left for maintenance. The speed will be lower. The fuel burn a bit higher. But there will be no comparison possible for resale value in future time.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-13-2007, 06:56 AM
SAQuestor SAQuestor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rep: 91 Posts: 163
Location: San Antonio
Quote:
Originally Posted by fcfc View Post
{snippage}
You have $15K left for maintenance. The speed will be lower. The fuel burn a bit higher. But there will be no comparison possible for resale value in future time.
Geez... How I hate it when someone rubs my face in reality.
__________________
You're not old until regrets replace dreams.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 04-13-2007, 05:59 PM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 399 Posts: 744
Location: france,europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAQuestor View Post
OK. Nice boat. Using my own labor over a 3 to 4 year build period, can I build one essentially equivalent in size and power for under $60K?

Leo
Do this kind of light semi displacement boat exist for homebuilding ? I have found none. You can find plans for 65 ft sailboats, worth hundreds k$, but a moderate 30-33 ft powerboat : No.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-13-2007, 09:36 PM
RonW RonW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 29 Posts: 24
Location: Ohio
Sadly but unfortunately, this thread has done very little to define what is a semi- hull, and what advantages or dissadvantages they have over a planning hull.
Wayne mentions the back 1/3 of the bottom of the hull as to rising, rather then the straight run aft of the planning hull, and the deeper forefootof the semi- hull.
But that seems to be about it as to hull shape. Leo posted pages with lobster boats that are semi hulls.Wonderfully performing boats.
And yes there are plans for semi hulls in all sizes reasonable available, if you know what you are looking for. One designer has been metioned in this thread with semi- hulls in the 30 to 33 ft. range.
Then again for a 33 fter plans, a wonderfull boat is the potluck by glen-l, a 33 ft. semi- hull. Lobster Boat. Excellent choice.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-14-2007, 03:51 AM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 399 Posts: 744
Location: france,europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonW View Post
Then again for a 33 fter plans, a wonderfull boat is the potluck by glen-l, a 33 ft. semi- hull. Lobster Boat. Excellent choice.
May be, but at 9250 lbs displacement and 100-120 hp, the potluck 33 will nearly cost twice to build and operate than a 5500 lbs 60 hp andreyale 33 clone.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-14-2007, 04:00 AM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 399 Posts: 744
Location: france,europe
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonW View Post
And yes there are plans for semi hulls in all sizes reasonable available, if you know what you are looking for. One designer has been metioned in this thread with semi- hulls in the 30 to 33 ft. range.
I am looking at len 31-33 ft, displacement < 5500 lbs,preferably < 5000 lbs beam < 8'4" , power < 60 hp, inboard diesel. Top Speed > 14 kts.
If you know any design that match (homebuilt or production), please give indications.

And if you think there are unreasonable dimensions above, can you tell which one and why?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-14-2007, 04:51 AM
Pericles's Avatar
Pericles Pericles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep: 1251 Posts: 1,686
Location: The heights of High Wycombe, not too far from River Thames
fcfc,

There are two Sam Devlin vessels that should suit your description, for which plans are available.

http://www.devlinboat.com/dctopknot.htm

http://www.devlinboat.com/dcbc29.htm

There are photographs at bottom of each page.

Pericles
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-14-2007, 06:01 AM
FAST FRED FAST FRED is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rep: 921 Posts: 3,937
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big dock & room for O'nite stop .
The advantage of the semi plaining is that the hull forward stays in contact with the water.This is not great for high speed but fine for 14K.

By selecting a proper entry the vessel will be far kinder in rough going than the full plaining boats to the occupants.

Take a look at Atkins River Belle , and contemplate JUST the hull, place whatever deck and house on it as you require.

Building in Airex foam core is a very simple way to allow a complex hull shape to be built fast , strong and light.But unfortunatly not cheaply.

FF
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-14-2007, 06:39 AM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 399 Posts: 744
Location: france,europe
Quote:
I am looking at len 31-33 ft, displacement < 5500 lbs,preferably < 5000 lbs beam < 8'4" , power < 60 hp, inboard diesel. Top Speed > 14 kts.
If you know any design that match (homebuilt or production), please give indications.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pericles View Post
fcfc,

There are two Sam Devlin vessels that should suit your description, for which plans are available.

http://www.devlinboat.com/dctopknot.htm
Displacement 10800lbs >> 5500 lbs.
Beam 10'2" >> 8'4"
Power 250 hp >> 60 hp.

Do not fit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pericles View Post
http://www.devlinboat.com/dcbc29.htm

There are photographs at bottom of each page.

Pericles
Len 29'2" < 31"
Beam 10' > 8'4"
Power 130-200hp >> 60 hp.
Displacement 8400 lbs > 5500 lbs.

Do not fit.

I have looked for nearly 1 year. And I have found nothing even close.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:16 AM
RonW RonW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 29 Posts: 24
Location: Ohio
FcFc- Neat, I see where you are coming from, the old time launch. I looked at the andreyale, nice looking and proportioned boat.
I take it you are wanting to push the boat to towing length, when you add in the length of the trailer tongue, and you are right at the width without a permit. Weight issue for a heavy truck or such.
There are a few boats that come to mind, one that looks almost the same is ruel parker 36 ft. commuter, but it is 3 ft. longer. Same weight and it uses a 90 horse outboard.
http://www.parker-marine.com/commuterpage.htm
The architect mmd, can be found on the wooden boat board, drew plans for the same boat but in aluminum, You could get him to draw a set in wood, at a reduced length of 33 ft. There are very good reports on the performance of the boat as well as stability and smooth ride.
Another design that comes to mind is the whio- it was featured on wooden boat a while back. It is 30 ft. long and only 7 & 1/2 ft/. wide, 3,000 lbs, and used a 60 horse inboard. This is a nice boat too.
And of course there are a couple boats by bolger, the idaho and tennessee I believe, They fit your weight, power and length roughly, and one is a lot longer as I remember. But they are flat bottomed plywood boats, that look kinda boxy and in my opinion are no where near or even close to being in the class of the andreyale, parker's commuter or the whio.
There are a couple of old time atkin designs in the high 20 ft. range that can easily be stretched 3 or 4 ft. by simple respacing frames. Atkin had a habit of using 12 frames on anything between 15 ft and 40 ft. by just increasing the spacing and size of framing and planking thickness.
Your 60 horse and 14 knots or 16 m.p.h. is pushing the engine to max, and the speed will be iffy, and not a cruising speed, you may want more like a 90 horse, so as to not push the power to the max. just what the parker commuter uses.
If you are serious, I would say to look at mmd's version and see about having a set of plans drawn to your specs, they will be well worth the price for the boat you want.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:44 AM
RonW RonW is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 29 Posts: 24
Location: Ohio
Here is the link to the mmd version of the commuter.
http://www.abco.ca/marine-abco36-pleasure.html
It is a little longer, lighter, and higher speeds.


Here is also a suggestion on a atkin boat, that could easily be stretched 3 ft. and could be converted to a outboard, particularly by using a bracket or manual jackplate and keeping the transom whole and solid.
I think it would make a wonderfull boat, and a little shorter for easier launching.
http://www.boat-links.com/Atkinco/Cruisers/Hope.html

--In reviewing the previous pages, I see where the 44 ftr commuter was listed and one of the bolger designs. too many pages to keep track of everything.
Reply With Quote


  #60  
Old 04-14-2007, 04:36 PM
fcfc fcfc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rep: 399 Posts: 744
Location: france,europe
There have already been lengthy threads about the GRAAL.
Long - Skinny Power Boats
Pocket cruisers

I am not particulary found of outboards. And when you put a inboard in commuter 36, the layout become awkward.

The second issue is I doubt seriously about resale/real value of a custom designed custom built boat. Especially when the primary reason for custom design/building is that no other similar boat do exist. That simply means there is NO market.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
looking for economical powercat benny333 Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building 9 12-27-2006 04:13 PM
Looking to design and build a flats boat (semi/planing hull) willfishforbeer Boat Design 2 06-14-2006 09:51 AM
lifting rails for an old semi-planing hull? mikfin Boat Design 14 03-29-2005 06:13 PM
Anybody who is looking for design service at economical rate SB MARINE Services & Employment 0 10-26-2004 03:02 AM
Semi-planing vs semi-displacement WayGray Boat Design 5 05-28-2003 11:21 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2014 Boat Design Net