Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Design > Propulsion > Outboards
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-24-2009, 06:48 AM
Adis Adis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rep: 27 Posts: 19
Location: Everywhere
Twin/Triple Outboard configuration

Sorry if this have been discussed somewhere in an older post

Can anyone tell me roughly how much (as a percentage value maybe) we are losing by adopting a twin or triple configuration outboard to a planning boat?

As an example, let's assume the Mercury 300HP Verado.

In single configuration, the net power is 300HP

In twin configuration, the power is roughly what? I would think that it will not be like having a single engine 600HP output, since there is interaction between the two submerged drives and props. According to some people, there will be a "power loss" which is "estimated" to be about 30% of the total power, i.e. in our example, about 180HP "loss", thus a net power of about 420HP.

Similarly there supposed to be a power "loss" from a triple configuration, i.e. not really a total of 900HP.

Does anyone can clarify this, and provide me with a rule of thumb in order to have a rough estimate?

I appreciate any help on the above. Thanks in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2009, 09:54 AM
Adis Adis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rep: 27 Posts: 19
Location: Everywhere
So, there is no one who can provide me with a hint?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2009, 10:13 AM
NEWENGLAND
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Parallel Ponies

HpT={Hp1+Hp2+Hp3}/3


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2009, 05:36 AM
Adis Adis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rep: 27 Posts: 19
Location: Everywhere
So, you mean that there is actually no power loss in the outcome?

I.e. if I install two outboards of 100HP each, I will have EXACTLY the same power output and therefore results (same top speed) as if I install one of 200HP??? Is this correct?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2009, 07:53 AM
NEWENGLAND
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Of course you dont lose any power

Of course you dont lose any power. I has to go somewhere. Maybe just Knot where you want it to go.


Speed on the otherhand is not a direct dependant upon power. you need to factor in water and wind resistance on your variable planning surface if your planning or on your variable submerged hull surface with its variable wave resonances at diffent frequencies. then yourve got boundry layers and reflections and all kinds of other stuff.

Remember those 600p pound Mules can only run just so fast no matter how many you have.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2009, 12:04 PM
alan white's Avatar
alan white alan white is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep: 1168 Posts: 3,270
Location: maine
Why not attempt to answer the question? Power could very well be lost in interaction between two props.
The question isn't relative to anything but a single outboard. Not sea state, water viscosity, thermal efficiency etc.
I personally don't know the answer, but someone here will.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-07-2009, 07:32 AM
kenJ kenJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Rep: 56 Posts: 323
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Engines don't lose power, 300 hp is still 300hp no matter how many engines are side by side. I think what he is asking is will he loose maximum thrust when he uses multiple engines. I was looking at a center cockpit ocean fisher in the 60' range the other day on a trailer. The center engine was the only one that had the cavitation plate in the correct place. The two outer engines had the props much further below the hull. There has got to be some loss of efficiency, but I don't know how to calculate it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-11-2009, 02:24 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 432 Posts: 1,358
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
You will always go faster with one big engine as you only have one gearbox in the water.
Assuming a production conventional boat, the outboard has been designed to do a specific job so gear ratio and prop diameters are all but fixed.
BUT if you have some workboat installation where you need all the prop you can get..that is a different story.

A few examples re fast boats, back in my day 28 foot v bottoms were raced with 2 v6 outboards and did about 70mph with a 3rd engine they went 5 mph faster if you were lucky. ( just an example of HP and drag)
There is no interaction between props once you are on the plane.
Racing sterndrives have the blade tips between 1 to 2inches apart.
So do you want to;
go fast
go reliable
go fuel efficant ( that will depend on many factors and at whay speed)
easy to handle
better weight distibution
remove torque, both hull and steering( using counter rotation gearboxes )
My experience, 2 is good and 3 is a pain in the ar*e
twins versus a V8 yammi? The Yami is designed to push a heavy boat not a fast one faster just like the old V8 OMC's.
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twin engine in offset configuration GoSlow Boat Design 2 01-02-2008 08:15 AM
twin outboard spacing 34 x 12.5ft Silverton naturewaterboy Powerboats 1 07-16-2007 08:27 PM
Twin outboard separation Archive Powerboats 4 12-03-2005 03:38 AM
34' + x 10.5' - Design Questions (Twin, Triple or Quad) rdeputy Boat Design 5 10-29-2005 10:43 AM
Twin engine, twin rudder and doors on a sailing yacht Arvy Boat Design 9 10-23-2005 11:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net